DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

Des Plaines DUI attorney Illinois corporate lawyer Joliet general practice lawyers breach of contract digital evidence condo association Deer Park traffic lawyer Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association DNR liens paid sick leave life insurance policy Retaliatory Discharge insurance agents Schaumburg insurance lawyers drugs employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys Barrington medical malpractice lawyers suspended license Illinois insurance claim attorney consent to a search sole proprietorship distracted driving accident victims privacy laws icy parking lots back injuries Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Chicago lawyer pizza emoji insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Illinois pet lawyer operating agreements health insurance dispute traumatic brain injury Arlington Heights employment attorney drug crime institutional trustee Illinois will lawyer criminal commercial leases Illinois employment lawyer Jay Andrew BAIID real estate Schaumburg traffic lawyer Palatine Attorney personal injury claim preventing accidents marijuana crimes attorney Schaumburg personal injury attorney insurance dispute estate tax ObamaCare traffic violations defense Long Grove estate planning attorneys life insurance claims Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys traffic laws real estate closing Illinois tax attorney estate planning for college students Palatine employment attorney car crash injuries Schaumburg estate attorney elder abuse Illinois traffic accident lawyer manufacturing Employment Discrimination Law speeding Palatine estate planning lawyer Palatine traffic accidents Des Plaines collections attorney insurance claim dispute Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Chicago insurance claim attorneys landlord Illinois traffic attorney defective products lawyer Palatine injury attorney Arlington Heights injury attorney traffic accidents Arlington Heights car crash attorneys taxes Illinois construction accident attorney Palatine trusts lawyer workplace sexual harassment Schaumburg real estate lawyer revenge porn Deer Park employment law attorney license Palatine personal injury lawyer Palatine corporate law attorneys medical malpractice personal injury claims deadly crashes internet home inspection lawyer job lawyers civil rights violation Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Arlington Heights Attorney investment property Chicago estate planning lawyer Illinois employment law firm Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Chicago estate planning insurance denial appeals overtime violations car crashes Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys forming a corporation in Illinois Illinois wills and trusts attorneys real estate contract living trust Des Plaines insurance attorney Illinois personal injury lawyers Illinois employment law attorneys Illinois estate planning Colin H. Gilbert Deer Park workers compensation lawyer cell phone involuntary manslaughter trauma after an accident Illinois workers compensation lawyer digital assets Illinois workplace lawyer Barrington civil litigation attorney advance healthcare directive drug crimes lawyer Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Rolling Meadows Attorney nursing home negligence underfunded trust fault based insurance Schaumburg civil litigation attorney probate process Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Palatine civil attorney Illinois insurance claims lawyers foreclosure Illinois real estate Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers personal injury attorney ACA power of attorney for healthcare Illinois workers compensation attorney Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Illinois employment law IRS Rolling Meadows traffic attorney workers compensation benefits blended families murder defense Illinois speeding lawyer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney South Barrington real estate lawyer real estate attorney tax attorney defective products real estate attorneys Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer federal regulations for LLCs condo insurance agent negligence Chicago employment lawyer Chicago will attorney Illinois trusts attorney Crystal Lake will lawyer license suspension dealing with problem employees Long Grove real estate lawyer digital information Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers personal injury rollover accidents murder charges DUI penalities Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer boating under the influence wage theft Illinois business law atorneys golf accidents Des Plaines accident attorney controlled substance Do Not Resuscitate medication errors pay when paid contract CAM Rolling Meadows probate lawyer Deer Park traffic accident attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer car accidents Deer Park DUI lawyer auto accidents Crystal Lake personal injury attorney insurance claim delay Arlington Heights employment law attorneys insurance claim denial Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Crystal Lake employment lawyer criminal defense probate traffic violations Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Illinois bicycle safety living trust vs will Illinois red light cameras Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney reckless homicide rumble strips natural gas spinal cord injuries employee discrimination workers comp Schaumburg senior citizens Des Plaines drug lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney social media after death income distribution deducation new real estate form work unions living wills Barrington drug crime attorney School Visitation Rights Act Legal Info Des Plaines injury law firm estate planning attorney problem employees compensatory time Barrington injury attorney Palatine elder law attorney Mount Prospect elder law attorney liability claims car accident lawyers Des Plaines real estate lawyer Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Fair Labor Standards Act breathalyzer test brain injury medical marijuana filing a medical malpractice claim Inverness corporate attorney healthcare claims holiday statistics boating DUI right to work Illinois criminal defense attorney Arlington Heights insurance attorney Barrington workers compensation attorney wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Rolling Meadows BUI Buffalo Grove traffic attorney trucking accident lawyers Barrington personal injury lawyer Illinois pedestrian accident attorney low-ball insurance settlement insurance claim trusts Barrington criminal defense lawyer Arlington Heights lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers severance agreements Crystal Lake tax lawyer Crystal Lake pet attorney probate lawyer Illinois Trust Code Policy Cancellation traffic deaths Crystal Lake car accident attorney car crash Palatine traffic lawyer special needs trust Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer pregnant women Arlington Heights car accident lawyer product liability Landlord Tenant Ordinance vacation home unfunded trust fiduciary rule delay Chicago corporate attorney Schaumburg criminal attorney spinal cord injury Inverness real estate lawyer Illinois living will Schaumburg elder law lawyer DGAA Barrington boating accident attorney Illinois defective products attorney Palatine workers compensation lawyer Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Illinois personal injury lawyer construction contracts Illinois workplace discrimination attorney LLCs Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Barrington attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Mount Prospect real estate lawyer swimming pools commercial leasing Illinois attorney Barrington estate planning attorney Arlington Heights tax lawyer jet ski Illinois LLC creation sexual harassment Barrington Traffic Lawyer Illinois trucking safety Rolling Meadows tax attorney traffic offenses Illinois boating accident lawyer employee rights Barrington personal injury attorney Transfer on Death Instrument real estate zoning driving Illinois employment law attorney digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers medical malpractice claims estate planning trusts car collision Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Arlington Heights accident attorney Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument unauthorized overtime automated cars Inverness DUI lawyer digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, wills and trusts insurance dispute attorney Deer Park medical malpractice attorney trench injuries Barrington employment law firm premises liability trustee Buffalo Grove law firm Illinois personal injury attorney Barrington estate planning lawyer Illinois personal injury vacation home fines Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney subcontractor Palatine punch death Deer Park criminal attorney boating accidents Palatine criminal defense lawyer independent contractor Barrington criminal lawyer pet law startup company child safety jet ski accidents Illinois elder law attorney license reinstatement motorcycle accident lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney PTSD Long Grove estate planning attorney Crystal Lake employment attorney pedestrian accident BAC traffic tickets financial advisors denied insurance claims commercial real estate Illinois estate planning attorney Crystal Lake accident attorney Whistleblower Claims Barrington litigation attorney Inverness elder law lawyer Schaumburg estate planning attorney Illinois employee rights attorney. POA TBI creditors Illinois business lawyer drug possession blood alcohol content Schaumburg probate attorney Inverness probate lawyer Illinois employment attorneys personal injury accidents gift taxes dog bites Des Plaines claims law firm Kenilworth estate planning lawyer insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Inverness accident lawyer Chicago car accident lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer mass shooting Illinois small business elder law life insurance South Barrington real estate attorney hands free device truck collisions Schaumburg employment attorney Illinois collections attorney uninsured motorist Illinois lawyer drug crimes Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Palatine construction attorney Illinois medical malpractice claim Illinois wills and trusts ken apicella in terrorem provision personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys no contest clauses Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Illinois jet ski accident lawyer homestead rights owner responsibility medical malpractice compensation Palatine corporate attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney IRA benefits minimum wage FSLA Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Illinois car accident attorney Illinois traffic attorneys Illinois mortgages Rolling Meadows business lawyer Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Fourth of July employment lawyer FMLA insurance disputes estate plan Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers business litigation Illinois medical malpractice lawyers pain and suffering GM ignition switches Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Schaumburg criminal law attorney clemency murder rollover car crashes agent Illinois Human Rights Act workers compensation Illinois civil litigation lawyer Palatine insurance lawyer gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Des Plaines real estate attorney Illinois DUI attorney Liquor Control Act fatal car accidents rent to own real estate contracts living trust benefits insurance claims Illinois medical malpractice case Des Plaines Deer Park personal injury lawyer Inverness insurance attorney Thanksgiving Des Plaines criminal attorney loopholes Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Illinois probate lawyer car accident lawyer Inverness real estate attorney estate planning Barrington employment law attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer cell phone tower data modern family estate planning drunk driving statistics IRELA Arlington Heights traffic attorney Illinois Smoke Detector Act life insurance lawyer irrevocable trust real estate leasing Chicago traffic lawyer Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Illinois injury lawyer DUI defense Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Palatine drug lawyer Schaumburg employment law attorneys Illinois registered agent Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers dynasty trusts DUI attorney surgical mistakes Des Plaines civil attorney Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Self-Directed IRA Accounts Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers appealing an insurance claim Des Plaines tax law firm Palatine law firm attorney fees texting and driving caretaker rights Illinois estate planning law firm Arlington Heights TBI attorney hiring employees real estate lawyer Crystal Lake law firm marijuana Forcible Entry Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Palatine employment law lawyer capital gains tax probate fees privacy Illinois insurance lawyer personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer unpaid overtime Barrington employment attorney residential real estate Long Grove real estate attorney employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Palatine real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers corporate law wills Affordable Care Act employment law Illinois law sexual images Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer liability employment attorney Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Chicago attorney Crystal Lake traffic attorney Palatine probate lawyer installment contracts Illinois real estate lawyer preventable medical errors pedestrian-automobile accident denial of life insurance Crystal Lake injury attorney expungement Illinois insurance disputes dram shop law license revocation Home Remodeling Repair Act Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer employees slip and fall accidents probate claims federal crimes estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, drunk driving Illinois traffic laws comp time deed transfer trust payments criminal law healthcare Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Illinois job attorney bad faith insurance claims estate planning lawyer Illinois wrongful termination lawyer whistleblower protections Illinois Sales Representative Act probate claims process trucking accidents employee misclassification fiduciary rule insurance negligence insurance claim dispute attorney loss of consortium Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer small business Schaumburg wrongful death attorney Deer Park accident attorney medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Deer Park real estate law firm overtime pay natural gas explosion DUI employment contract slip and fall contracts Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Schaumburg car accident attorney Illinois driving without license insurance attorney Barrington business law firm power of attorney Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Palatine employment lawyer Illinois Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer car accident field sobriety test Riverwoods estate planning lawyer bicycle dooring accidents Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Detainer Actions Illinois insurance attorney Chicago biking tips landlord tenant law Crystal Lake business law attorneys construction accidents bike accident wrongful death Barrington real estate lawyer Illinois insurance dispute lawyers pedestrian accidents Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer civil litigation attorney employment law, Illinois employment laws Illinois medical malpractice attorney Inverness personal injury attorney Arlington Heights real estate lawyer traffic crimes guardianship attorney motorcycle accident Family Medical Leave Act personal injury law firm Mt Prospect Attorney Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers college kids accidental death benefits changes to mortgage law foreclosed rental property Chicago insurance law firm crossover accidents Palatine civil litigation lawyer Illinois rollover accident lawyers Exclusions Rolling Meadows traffic law firm IRA trust transfer Inverness traffic law firm wrongful termination Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer civil litigation Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Inverness civil lawyer pet bites cell phone accidents first degree murder Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Illinois employment laws Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Crystal Lake employment law attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer texting while driving Home Sale Contingencies Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer unpaid assessment insurance claim denials Long Grove estate planning medical research Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm food poisoning Colin Gilbert Chicago trucking accident attorney head on collisions Super Mario Des Plaines pet law attorney Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Rolling Meadows employment attorney eluding a police officer hit and run accident DMV comparative negligence Chicago employment attorney Schaumburg Attorney meal breaks underage DUI Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Kenilworth estate planning attorney traumatic brain injuries disability benefits estate attorney criminal record bicycle accidents anesthesia errors Palatine business attorney Class A misdemeanor Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents insurance denials rest breaks insurance adjusters distracted driving accidents Attorney Ken Apicella caregiver Illinois home inspection denied insurance claim Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney mortgage Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney underinsured motorist products liability Inverness injury lawyer

Archive