DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

Deer Park traffic lawyer construction contracts Inverness real estate lawyer IRS uninsured motorist gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Long Grove estate planning Barrington employment attorney ken apicella Buffalo Grove corporate attorney estate plan Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act real estate leasing Inverness insurance attorney Rolling Meadows Attorney bicycle accidents Inverness traffic law firm healthcare claims murder defense digital information life insurance claims Retaliatory Discharge Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney insurance negligence insurance agent negligence Illinois probate lawyer car accident lawyers Arlington Heights accident attorney loss of consortium Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer personal injury law firm corporate law Palatine personal injury lawyer insurance claim denials BAIID Illinois trusts attorney criminal record Schaumburg criminal attorney boating under the influence Illinois employment law Palatine injury attorney Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Inverness injury lawyer subcontractor Chicago lawyer Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers Chicago trucking accident attorney Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney breach of contract in terrorem provision Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers blood alcohol content insurance claim delay traffic offenses car accident lawyer Inverness civil lawyer fatal car accidents Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Barrington business law firm Rolling Meadows traffic law firm coronavirus Arlington Heights employment attorney Barrington injury attorney Schaumburg medication errors Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers digital assets Long Grove real estate lawyer Barrington workers compensation attorney Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument insurance claims probate claims Illinois DUI attorney motorcycle accident Schaumburg estate planning attorney Chicago life insurance attorney Des Plaines accident attorney crossover accidents estate planning attorney license digital evidence holiday statistics Rolling Meadows tax attorney Palatine life insurance lawyer Barrington drug crime attorney comp time Arlington Heights tax lawyer Barrington estate planning attorney overtime pay Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys owner responsibility Crystal Lake pet attorney Illinois corporate lawyer spinal cord injury employment law, Illinois employment laws landlord pedestrian accident Chicago insurance law firm Palatine insurance lawyer Landlord Tenant Ordinance Schaumburg personal injury attorney medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers life insurance policy Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney car accidents Illinois collections attorney criminal defense Crystal Lake law firm first degree murder investment property Crystal Lake business law attorneys Illinois Human Rights Act Palatine traffic lawyer probate lawyer Deer Park workers compensation lawyer murder Illinois business law atorneys reckless homicide pet bites medical malpractice Illinois Smoke Detector Act license suspension wrongful termination Des Plaines tax law firm dealing with problem employees comparative negligence golf accidents Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney wrongful death Illinois Trust Code Chicago will attorney Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Barrington employment law attorney LLCs employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Schaumburg probate attorney IRELA material misrepresentation forming a corporation in Illinois Arlington Heights insurance attorney Arlington Heights lawyer Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer marijuana Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Barrington personal injury lawyer Illinois defective products attorney Policy Cancellation commercial real estate power of attorney for healthcare drug crime sole proprietorship estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Des Plaines civil attorney trucking accident lawyers Kenilworth estate planning lawyer advance healthcare directive Rolling Meadows Chicago biking tips Chicago estate planning lawyer Illinois car accident attorney Forcible Entry institutional trustee Barrington real estate lawyer jet ski accidents trauma after an accident marijuana crimes attorney internet Inverness estate planning lawyer Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney DUI Illinois traffic attorney employee rights Palatine criminal defense lawyer Attorney Ken Apicella Illinois traffic laws Rolling Meadows traffic attorney trusts real estate attorneys Palatine employment lawyer income distribution deducation Des Plaines insurance attorney Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer car crashes Illinois bicycle safety Illinois insurance lawyer Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer residential real estate Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Family Medical Leave Act installment contracts rollover accidents Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer drug possession college kids products liability Thanksgiving employee misclassification Palatine corporate law attorneys DNR Barrington criminal defense lawyer Inverness real estate attorney home inspection lawyer Palatine corporate attorney Arlington Heights criminal lawyer deadly crashes South Barrington real estate lawyer auto accidents insufficient documentation elder law Illinois injury lawyer Mount Prospect elder law attorney Illinois construction accident attorney Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Long Grove estate planning attorneys surgical mistakes natural gas living trust benefits Barrington employment law firm privacy Illinois insurance claims lawyers bad faith insurance claims Palatine civil litigation lawyer Illinois estate planning law firm life insurance Crystal Lake traffic lawyer problem employees PTSD Chicago attorney Palatine traffic accidents Home Remodeling Repair Act construction accidents Chicago corporate attorney Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Illinois insurance claim attorney back injuries pet law Deer Park DUI lawyer trench injuries traumatic brain injury hit and run accident estate tax Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney CAM Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Crystal Lake traffic attorney Chicago employment lawyer Colin H. Gilbert Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers no contest clauses Kenilworth estate planning attorney denied insurance claims Rolling Meadows probate lawyer Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney nursing home negligence Des Plaines injury law firm Illinois home inspection Palatine Attorney Des Plaines collections attorney Palatine employment attorney School Visitation Rights Act power of attorney how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims Illinois Probate Act of 1975 underfunded trust capital gains tax Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents vacation home fines texting while driving slip and fall accidents insurance disputes Illinois rollover accident lawyers Palatine drug lawyer personal injury claim Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer civil litigation attorney Illinois small business living trust civil litigation involuntary manslaughter personal injury attorney beneficiary complications insurance denial appeals Illinois workers compensation lawyer pay when paid contract lapse in policy Whistleblower Claims Jay Andrew Crystal Lake car accident lawyer rest breaks Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Illinois attorney criminal Schaumburg estate attorney meal breaks foreclosed rental property Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer trustee Illinois personal injury attorney Schaumburg wrongful death attorney tax attorney llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Barrington boating accident attorney Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Illinois Sales Representative Act distracted driving accidents estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer criminal law probate process Schaumburg criminal law attorney Palatine law firm fiduciary rule delay Illinois mortgages cell phone accidents Schaumburg employment law attorneys deed transfer insurance claim dispute attorney Illinois employment law firm automated cars trucking accidents Palatine trusts lawyer Illinois employment laws guardianship attorney commercial leasing Schaumburg corporate attorney Legal Info Riverwoods estate planning lawyer real estate attorney blended families preventable medical errors Chicago traffic lawyer personal injury claims real estate closing wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Class A misdemeanor Illinois real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer independent contractor POA Illinois Illinois insurance attorney BUI Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Deer Park real estate law firm insurance claim denial Arlington Heights TBI attorney Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys insurance claim Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer employee discrimination employment lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute boating DUI estate attorney drug crimes lawyer Illinois driving without license Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Liquor Control Act filing a medical malpractice claim Barrington Traffic Lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney whistleblower protections hands free device product liability pizza emoji Arlington Heights injury attorney personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality car collision special needs trust personal injury lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyer Chicago car accident lawyer workers compensation insurance dispute condo association probate claims process Crystal Lake will lawyer wills and trusts Illinois real estate traffic violations defense DUI attorney drunk driving statistics DUI defense Barrington personal injury attorney taxes attorney fees startup company truck collisions loopholes Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer manufacturing rumble strips Illinois traffic attorneys fault based insurance Illinois trucking safety bicycle dooring accidents TBI medical malpractice claims Des Plaines real estate lawyer Illinois boating accident lawyer unpaid assessment Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Colin Gilbert Inverness corporate attorney cell phone tower data ObamaCare distracted driving accident victims Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Mt Prospect Attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer Illinois job attorney traffic tickets Illinois wrongful termination lawyer traumatic brain injuries DUI penalities Chicago estate planning brain injury insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Inverness elder law lawyer Illinois traffic accident lawyer real estate Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Des Plaines DUI attorney commercial leases construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Kenilworth estate planning attorneys digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers real estate lawyer license revocation Deer Park criminal attorney denial of insurance claim liens cause-of-death exclusions Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Deer Park traffic accident attorney overtime violations Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Palatine employment law lawyer Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers unpaid overtime living trust vs will Illinois registered agent breathalyzer test insurance attorney hiring employees FSLA Palatine business attorney most common reasons for life insurance claim denials Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, probate personal injury accidents Illinois red light cameras Schaumburg car accident attorney mortgage GM ignition switches Illinois employment attorneys social media after death Illinois workplace lawyer pedestrian accidents Chicago employment attorney business litigation Arlington Heights Attorney Buffalo Grove employment lawyer changes to mortgage law defective products clemency health insurance dispute pregnant women boating accidents Illinois law Illinois lawyer Barrington attorney medical research speeding rollover car crashes Illinois will lawyer Crystal Lake injury attorney financial advisors Buffalo Grove injury lawyer insurance adjusters Illinois wills and trusts attorneys workers compensation benefits employment attorney traffic crimes Schaumburg Attorney Fourth of July anesthesia errors motorcycle accident lawyer head on collisions Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer life insurance lawyer car crash injuries Illinois criminal defense attorney Illinois personal injury murder charges estate planning preventing accidents Schaumburg life insurance attorney Illinois personal injury lawyers Deer Park employment law attorney rent to own real estate contracts Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Barrington life insurance lawyer Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney traffic accidents Rolling Meadows business lawyer accidental death benefits employment law Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Illinois pet lawyer work unions Exclusions Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Palatine elder law attorney Palatine punch death insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys healthcare suspended license liability claims traffic deaths spinal cord injuries driving Schaumburg insurance lawyers traffic violations Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake employment lawyer Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney workers comp Illinois LLC creation fiduciary rule Illinois wills and trusts field sobriety test paid sick leave Illinois estate planning trust payments cell phone Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Deer Park medical malpractice attorney dram shop law insurance dispute attorney Palatine estate planning lawyer Palatine construction attorney real estate zoning Fair Labor Standards Act compensatory time Illinois medical malpractice claim Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Inverness accident lawyer Illinois employment lawyer Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Schaumburg traffic lawyer estate planning for college students Home Sale Contingencies Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Illinois business lawyer job lawyers wage theft unauthorized overtime small business car crash Employment Discrimination Law Des Plaines claims law firm Buffalo Grove law firm denied insurance claim medical marijuana pedestrian-automobile accident Crystal Lake accident attorney Barrington litigation attorney Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Barrington estate planning lawyer Illinois medical malpractice attorney Crystal Lake employment attorney severance agreements Illinois employee rights attorney. Illinois medical malpractice case Crystal Lake tax lawyer premises liability Des Plaines drug lawyer dynasty trusts South Barrington real estate attorney Barrington criminal lawyer right to work expungement landlord tenant law new real estate form caretaker rights Illinois workers compensation attorney workplace sexual harassment condo federal regulations for LLCs slip and fall Illinois employment law attorney swimming pools Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Des Plaines criminal attorney denial of life insurance Crystal Lake car accident attorney life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim Inverness DUI lawyer Palatine real estate lawyer Des Plaines pet law attorney irrevocable trust Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney BAC estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers appealing an insurance claim vacation home privacy laws controlled substance employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys homestead rights disability benefits license reinstatement mass shooting Illinois employment law attorneys Joliet general practice lawyers sexual images senior citizens revenge porn agent foreclosure Illinois tax attorney Rolling Meadows real estate attorney drug crimes defective products lawyer IRA trust transfer bike accident consent to a search medical malpractice compensation Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Arlington Heights car crash attorneys child safety Illinois elder law attorney top life insurance claim denials Schaumburg employment attorney Palatine probate lawyer Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Do Not Resuscitate underage DUI Barrington civil litigation attorney unfunded trust probate fees Des Plaines sexual harassment real estate contract underinsured motorist Deer Park accident attorney Schaumburg elder law lawyer elder abuse Buffalo Grove real estate attorney estate planning trusts Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Illinois insurance disputes Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyers liability Arlington Heights traffic attorney insurance agents Detainer Actions Self-Directed IRA Accounts texting and driving Arlington Heights car accident lawyer drunk driving wills Deer Park personal injury lawyer food poisoning living wills traffic laws low-ball insurance settlement contracts Long Grove estate planning attorney icy parking lots Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Schaumburg real estate lawyer modern family estate planning employees Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Chicago insurance claim attorneys natural gas explosion caregiver pain and suffering Transfer on Death Instrument Illinois speeding lawyer minimum wage employment contract FMLA ACA Illinois civil litigation lawyer Palatine workers compensation lawyer digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, insurance claim dispute drugs eluding a police officer insurance denials creditors Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers civil rights violation DMV Illinois living will federal crimes Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Long Grove real estate attorney gift taxes car accident Inverness probate lawyer Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Super Mario Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Palatine civil attorney personal injury Illinois estate planning attorney IRA benefits Affordable Care Act Des Plaines real estate attorney DGAA operating agreements jet ski Arlington Heights estate planning attorney dog bites Rolling Meadows employment attorney

Archive