DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

Palatine business attorney federal regulations for LLCs Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney caretaker rights traffic tickets bicycle dooring accidents insurance negligence sexual images real estate attorney Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer rollover car crashes Illinois rollover accident lawyers Arlington Heights injury attorney Arlington Heights car crash attorneys insurance attorney breach of contract vacation home fines elder abuse Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Illinois real estate lawyer Schaumburg criminal attorney blended families Transfer on Death Instrument Des Plaines insurance attorney creditors Des Plaines drug lawyer Illinois criminal defense attorney cause-of-death exclusions wage theft Affordable Care Act traffic violations Crystal Lake will lawyer sole proprietorship Arlington Heights TBI attorney Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Illinois insurance dispute lawyers South Barrington real estate attorney small business Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers social media after death Illinois injury lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm estate planning estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers real estate lawyer employee misclassification Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Inverness injury lawyer insufficient documentation pet law Illinois real estate underfunded trust attorney fees defective products Illinois Probate Act of 1975 in terrorem provision Illinois employment laws Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Illinois speeding lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Barrington estate planning attorney cell phone tower data Inverness real estate lawyer real estate attorneys Barrington employment law attorney personal injury law firm Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer medical marijuana real estate leasing Illinois driving without license Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Illinois workplace lawyer Illinois traffic attorney appealing an insurance claim insurance claim denial denial of insurance claim Illinois DUI attorney Palatine traffic lawyer subcontractor Illinois personal injury lawyer trucking accidents trucking accident lawyers elder law real estate zoning Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Illinois insurance attorney Long Grove estate planning attorneys BUI rest breaks Illinois insurance claim attorney IRELA trench injuries license revocation back injuries pedestrian-automobile accident Barrington life insurance lawyer Illinois estate planning Barrington medical malpractice lawyers real estate closing Barrington boating accident attorney Crystal Lake pet attorney Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer preventing accidents driving loss of consortium license Barrington Traffic Lawyer Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Chicago life insurance attorney senior citizens Schaumburg corporate attorney Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Deer Park medical malpractice attorney blood alcohol content pet bites TBI Crystal Lake business law attorneys Illinois living will trustee hands free device denied insurance claim holiday statistics Des Plaines tax law firm food poisoning Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, new real estate form Palatine employment law lawyer insurance claim denials DUI Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers IRS rollover accidents ken apicella surgical mistakes Illinois boating accident lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Chicago employment attorney brain injury breathalyzer test hit and run accident car crash injuries Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney medical malpractice compensation trusts commercial leasing criminal law Inverness corporate attorney Retaliatory Discharge comp time Mount Prospect real estate lawyer bike accident Buffalo Grove real estate attorney car accidents mortgage traumatic brain injuries deadly crashes Family Medical Leave Act Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers probate claims Illinois LLC creation Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Arlington Heights Attorney Schaumburg employees probate lawyer distracted driving accident victims Illinois Smoke Detector Act Schaumburg traffic lawyer Barrington drug crime attorney DUI defense pay when paid contract Palatine employment lawyer DNR Arlington Heights employment attorney natural gas civil litigation attorney consent to a search Illinois mortgages Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Arlington Heights traffic attorney CAM traffic laws vacation home pregnant women Deer Park criminal attorney real estate contract South Barrington real estate lawyer living trust benefits Palatine insurance lawyer medication errors license suspension employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer traumatic brain injury Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Chicago insurance law firm insurance claims gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys modern family estate planning Illinois employment law attorney Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer liens Palatine injury attorney life insurance policy installment contracts expungement condo association IRA benefits Inverness probate lawyer Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Illinois employment attorneys Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Crystal Lake injury attorney Illinois workers compensation lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Des Plaines real estate lawyer medical malpractice claims boating accidents Palatine probate lawyer Des Plaines injury law firm Illinois insurance disputes liability claims Chicago car accident lawyer Illinois attorney Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Arlington Heights lawyer pedestrian accidents Palatine drug lawyer Schaumburg injury lawyer Arlington Heights insurance attorney Barrington real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney advance healthcare directive Barrington litigation attorney Inverness DUI lawyer Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act insurance disputes income distribution deducation Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Chicago lawyer Deer Park personal injury lawyer privacy laws Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney BAIID financial advisors construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation employee discrimination Chicago trucking accident attorney sexual harassment Rolling Meadows accident lawyer cell phone Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer filing a medical malpractice claim Illinois medical malpractice case criminal defense car accident Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Illinois defective products attorney field sobriety test Des Plaines personal injury attorney Illinois trucking safety Deer Park real estate law firm Illinois business law atorneys digital information Des Plaines personal injury lawyers most common reasons for life insurance claim denials traffic accidents residential real estate employment attorney workers compensation benefits Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Schaumburg employment attorney insurance denials Chicago will attorney Crystal Lake traffic attorney LLCs Crystal Lake car accident attorney uninsured motorist Schaumburg estate attorney preventable medical errors Deer Park DUI lawyer foreclosed rental property wills Rolling Meadows employment attorney Schaumburg elder law lawyer employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Inverness elder law lawyer Fourth of July Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Crystal Lake tax lawyer Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Illinois Trust Code Inverness civil lawyer coronavirus Palatine civil attorney probate process Palatine criminal defense lawyer trust payments internet Palatine punch death estate attorney Arlington Heights employment law attorneys traffic deaths severance agreements Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Schaumburg wrongful death attorney Long Grove real estate attorney Illinois elder law attorney Palatine corporate law attorneys GM ignition switches Forcible Entry changes to mortgage law anesthesia errors commercial leases Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Illinois corporate lawyer Barrington personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer trauma after an accident Rolling Meadows Attorney living trust Illinois personal injury lawyers Exclusions slip and fall accidents Illinois car accident attorney auto accidents reckless homicide life insurance claims traffic violations defense Illinois civil litigation lawyer operating agreements Illinois tax attorney Schaumburg life insurance attorney Illinois trusts attorney Deer Park traffic lawyer defective products lawyer Palatine life insurance lawyer landlord top life insurance claim denials capital gains tax Deer Park traffic accident attorney insurance dispute college kids traffic crimes murder charges Des Plaines claims law firm life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim civil litigation Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Illinois business lawyer cell phone accidents clemency Illinois employment law attorneys DUI attorney Illinois insurance lawyer Schaumburg estate planning attorney dynasty trusts truck collisions whistleblower protections automated cars Chicago employment lawyer Fair Labor Standards Act Des Plaines personal injury lawyer digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers unfunded trust boating DUI Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Des Plaines real estate attorney car crash real estate suspended license home inspection lawyer Palatine law firm Illinois pet lawyer drug possession Illinois construction accident attorney forming a corporation in Illinois condo Crystal Lake insurance lawyer murder defense Liquor Control Act Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney insurance denial appeals Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Illinois insurance claims lawyers drunk driving Whistleblower Claims Chicago traffic lawyer Chicago biking tips Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney child safety dog bites healthcare job lawyers Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Detainer Actions Crystal Lake employment lawyer Schaumburg car accident attorney Deer Park accident attorney PTSD Barrington attorney Des Plaines civil attorney Rolling Meadows business lawyer special needs trust power of attorney for healthcare workplace sexual harassment construction accidents drunk driving statistics Kenilworth estate planning attorney how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims denied insurance claims employment law Schaumburg personal injury attorney Long Grove estate planning car collision insurance claim delay Mount Prospect elder law attorney DMV Barrington business law firm underinsured motorist material misrepresentation Illinois personal injury attorney llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association no contest clauses School Visitation Rights Act Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Des Plaines pet law attorney Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Des Plaines criminal attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer spinal cord injury Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Illinois estate planning attorney speeding low-ball insurance settlement Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Buffalo Grove law firm Palatine trusts lawyer Rolling Meadows gift taxes liability Home Sale Contingencies lapse in policy estate planning trusts power of attorney murder Palatine Attorney Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer probate fees Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer criminal record paid sick leave Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney motorcycle accident lawyer texting and driving living wills Schaumburg insurance lawyers hiring employees Deer Park employment law attorney Barrington employment law firm estate plan Chicago estate planning landlord tenant law Legal Info Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission underage DUI Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Illinois workers compensation attorney Super Mario pain and suffering Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer first degree murder overtime pay Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers estate planning attorney Des Plaines fiduciary rule delay Palatine civil litigation lawyer nursing home negligence head on collisions Illinois small business pedestrian accident Des Plaines accident attorney Palatine personal injury lawyer Schaumburg criminal law attorney Joliet general practice lawyers estate planning lawyer Colin Gilbert insurance claim dispute attorney healthcare claims Illinois Illinois wills and trusts attorneys drug crime Crystal Lake employment attorney foreclosure Illinois medical malpractice lawyers DUI penalities Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Palatine traffic accidents IRA trust transfer Illinois bicycle safety life insurance lawyer drug crimes Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney personal injury claim personal injury lawyer compensatory time Schaumburg employment law attorneys Illinois red light cameras Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Illinois traffic attorneys business litigation independent contractor problem employees minimum wage Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg Attorney civil rights violation Inverness accident lawyer fiduciary rule deed transfer Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer crossover accidents digital assets Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Barrington injury attorney jet ski accidents Chicago estate planning lawyer corporate law DGAA swimming pools Barrington employment attorney insurance claim Landlord Tenant Ordinance ObamaCare Palatine workers compensation lawyer personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows tax attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney federal crimes personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Illinois collections attorney controlled substance Illinois law digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, employment lawyer motorcycle accident workers comp Employment Discrimination Law Illinois registered agent wrongful death involuntary manslaughter Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Kenilworth estate planning lawyer texting while driving medical malpractice Long Grove estate planning attorney Schaumburg probate attorney Chicago attorney Illinois will lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm boating under the influence construction contracts estate planning for college students workers compensation living trust vs will Illinois employee rights attorney. bad faith insurance claims health insurance dispute life insurance Jay Andrew work unions Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Barrington estate planning lawyer estate tax guardianship attorney contracts Arlington Heights accident attorney BAC Des Plaines DUI attorney spinal cord injuries insurance dispute attorney owner responsibility insurance agents marijuana crimes attorney Palatine real estate lawyer dealing with problem employees loopholes Palatine corporate attorney jet ski Illinois traffic accident lawyer Illinois personal injury beneficiary complications dram shop law Thanksgiving criminal wrongful termination Illinois home inspection denial of life insurance Illinois job attorney Illinois employment law firm car accident lawyers medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers comparative negligence wills and trusts POA employee rights Inverness traffic law firm manufacturing Illinois employment lawyer bicycle accidents Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers distracted driving accidents commercial real estate insurance agent negligence Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Inverness real estate attorney probate claims process Palatine construction attorney insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Palatine elder law attorney accidental death benefits digital evidence Chicago insurance claim attorneys Rolling Meadows insurance attorney caregiver ACA FMLA license reinstatement startup company traffic offenses car accident lawyer natural gas explosion personal injury Rolling Meadows probate lawyer Self-Directed IRA Accounts Illinois Human Rights Act Illinois medical malpractice attorney Schaumburg real estate lawyer right to work Illinois wills and trusts eluding a police officer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney unpaid assessment Illinois estate planning law firm tax attorney disability benefits Barrington workers compensation attorney slip and fall Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer premises liability Palatine employment attorney Illinois traffic laws homestead rights rumble strips insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys privacy unpaid overtime meal breaks Policy Cancellation unauthorized overtime Attorney Ken Apicella Long Grove real estate lawyer agent golf accidents Barrington criminal defense lawyer Illinois probate lawyer Crystal Lake accident attorney Crystal Lake law firm taxes Illinois lawyer Class A misdemeanor Barrington personal injury attorney drug crimes lawyer Colin H. Gilbert revenge porn medical research marijuana icy parking lots Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer overtime violations Do Not Resuscitate insurance adjusters Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Chicago corporate attorney insurance claim dispute estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Inverness insurance attorney Home Remodeling Repair Act employment contract Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Palatine estate planning lawyer Barrington civil litigation attorney Kenilworth estate planning attorneys pizza emoji fault based insurance rent to own real estate contracts Inverness personal injury attorney Illinois Sales Representative Act fatal car accidents Illinois employment law Mt Prospect Attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer probate car crashes Buffalo Grove injury lawyer employment law, Illinois employment laws Arlington Heights tax lawyer FSLA Des Plaines collections attorney personal injury claims institutional trustee products liability mass shooting investment property Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Barrington criminal lawyer personal injury accidents irrevocable trust Illinois medical malpractice claim drugs Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer product liability wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace

Archive