DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

ACA Colin H. Gilbert Inverness real estate lawyer Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer wills breathalyzer test TBI attorney fees real estate attorneys employees insurance agents boating under the influence Illinois traffic ticket lawyer automated cars first degree murder Deer Park DUI lawyer Arlington Heights lawyer Des Plaines civil attorney Schaumburg real estate lawyer underinsured motorist probate liens probate claims Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Long Grove real estate lawyer Palatine employment lawyer estate plan license revocation Barrington personal injury attorney homestead rights distracted driving accident victims Des Plaines collections attorney criminal problem employees Super Mario Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer distracted driving accidents Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Palatine workers compensation lawyer irrevocable trust suspended license Attorney Ken Apicella Barrington estate planning attorney Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act living trust Long Grove real estate attorney Schaumburg employment attorney DNR Barrington criminal lawyer Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Palatine employment attorney life insurance lawyer truck collisions civil litigation Des Plaines criminal attorney Illinois driving without license traffic deaths real estate contract Chicago attorney real estate attorney Crystal Lake traffic attorney medication errors Barrington employment attorney Crystal Lake traffic lawyer insurance claim denial Schaumburg wrongful death attorney traumatic brain injury IRELA hiring employees Mount Prospect elder law attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Schaumburg elder law lawyer comp time Palatine elder law attorney employment law, Illinois employment laws Jay Andrew Barrington attorney Illinois bicycle safety estate planning attorney probate fees rollover car crashes Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Chicago estate planning Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Arlington Heights accident attorney traffic crimes back injuries bicycle dooring accidents Rolling Meadows employment attorney loopholes Illinois will lawyer slip and fall healthcare Chicago insurance claim attorneys natural gas explosion personal injury law firm golf accidents advance healthcare directive Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney insurance claim Palatine traffic accidents right to work civil rights violation defective products Arlington Heights personal injury attorney child safety living wills paid sick leave financial advisors driving unfunded trust Palatine insurance lawyer overtime pay murder defense Deer Park personal injury lawyer wage theft Illinois Sales Representative Act drunk driving swimming pools Illinois employment law attorney medical malpractice claims social media after death Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer installment contracts Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Illinois tax attorney living trust vs will employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers personal injury claims Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act IRS BAC Palatine trusts lawyer contracts Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Arlington Heights trucking lawyer surgical mistakes Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Illinois rollover accident lawyers Des Plaines filing a medical malpractice claim Deer Park workers compensation lawyer auto accidents Crystal Lake employment law attorney Fair Labor Standards Act estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers wills and trusts construction contracts Inverness DUI lawyer DUI defense expungement Employment Discrimination Law Illinois speeding lawyer Buffalo Grove real estate attorney head on collisions motorcycle accident lawyer llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Joliet general practice lawyers drug crime unpaid assessment Whistleblower Claims insurance adjusters manufacturing Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney insurance disputes Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Crystal Lake employment lawyer preventing accidents traffic laws new real estate form bicycle accidents Barrington drug crime attorney trusts real estate leasing Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Illinois personal injury marijuana commercial leases Des Plaines insurance attorney wrongful death Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Chicago employment attorney insurance claim delay Schaumburg criminal attorney Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Chicago insurance law firm Palatine law firm Palatine employment law lawyer Illinois lawyer foreclosed rental property Chicago estate planning lawyer traffic accidents Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm cell phone accidents Illinois workers compensation attorney startup company compensatory time Schaumburg Colin Gilbert underfunded trust involuntary manslaughter insurance claim denials texting and driving Crystal Lake will lawyer Des Plaines real estate lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Forcible Entry Chicago biking tips Des Plaines drug lawyer car crashes Des Plaines injury law firm caretaker rights car accident lawyers Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Illinois Smoke Detector Act Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Illinois car accident attorney Illinois job attorney Illinois medical malpractice claim residential real estate Palatine injury attorney boating accidents car accident trench injuries personal injury anesthesia errors traffic violations defective products lawyer Crystal Lake accident attorney healthcare claims mortgage vacation home fines Chicago lawyer elder abuse Schaumburg traffic lawyer insurance denials pet bites commercial leasing personal injury lawyer Home Sale Contingencies business litigation crossover accidents Palatine criminal defense lawyer Arlington Heights employment attorney Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Illinois law bike accident Palatine civil attorney creditors workers comp Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer DUI penalities landlord tenant law Crystal Lake pet attorney employee misclassification sexual harassment employment lawyer Barrington real estate lawyer blended families liability whistleblower protections insurance dispute Illinois medical malpractice attorney CAM Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Barrington injury attorney real estate unpaid overtime Rolling Meadows accident lawyer taxes in terrorem provision Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Kenilworth estate planning attorney Illinois traffic laws Policy Cancellation murder charges Illinois traffic accident lawyer hit and run accident Buffalo Grove law firm Illinois insurance dispute lawyers car accident lawyer Crystal Lake tax lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Inverness elder law lawyer vacation home Inverness traffic law firm Chicago car accident lawyer Palatine drug lawyer Crystal Lake law firm Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Schaumburg civil litigation attorney estate planning trusts Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, consent to a search Inverness injury lawyer Crystal Lake business law attorneys Deer Park traffic accident attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Illinois employment law attorneys insurance agent negligence Illinois traffic attorneys cell phone tower data Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Schaumburg insurance lawyers wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Illinois insurance claims lawyers Inverness personal injury attorney Barrington criminal defense lawyer digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers employee rights foreclosure workers compensation motorcycle accident Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Schaumburg personal injury attorney Riverwoods estate planning lawyer insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys estate attorney Barrington employment law attorney LLCs South Barrington real estate attorney comparative negligence rollover accidents Illinois registered agent overtime violations estate planning for college students DUI pregnant women home inspection lawyer insurance denial appeals Landlord Tenant Ordinance fiduciary rule Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Mount Prospect real estate lawyer deed transfer Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Long Grove estate planning attorney appealing an insurance claim icy parking lots Affordable Care Act gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys trustee Illinois employment lawyer medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Barrington litigation attorney Fourth of July workers compensation benefits guardianship attorney Crystal Lake employment attorney Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Illinois employee rights attorney. Des Plaines accident attorney Chicago employment lawyer Do Not Resuscitate Palatine business attorney minimum wage Illinois injury lawyer Palatine civil litigation lawyer denial of life insurance Des Plaines pet law attorney insurance claim dispute attorney Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer products liability car accidents commercial real estate car collision corporate law denied insurance claims condo association BAIID Illinois employment law Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Barrington Traffic Lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers Des Plaines personal injury lawyers rest breaks Des Plaines real estate attorney owner responsibility insurance attorney Mt Prospect Attorney Deer Park employment law attorney Illinois business lawyer Illinois insurance claim attorney Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Inverness probate lawyer spinal cord injury Illinois estate planning Inverness accident lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney Rolling Meadows Arlington Heights injury attorney rumble strips internet employee discrimination Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer loss of consortium Illinois civil litigation lawyer Illinois mortgages estate planning lawyer employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys trucking accidents Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Schaumburg probate attorney Illinois elder law attorney Illinois business law atorneys personal injury claim DMV insurance claim dispute sole proprietorship federal crimes mass shooting job lawyers employment contract pedestrian accident Illinois attorney Illinois insurance disputes Illinois living will denied insurance claim Deer Park traffic lawyer low-ball insurance settlement Illinois employment law firm traffic offenses Illinois probate lawyer Buffalo Grove probate lawyer modern family estate planning capital gains tax Illinois workplace lawyer PTSD estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, insurance negligence Chicago traffic lawyer estate tax food poisoning jet ski accidents Inverness civil lawyer pain and suffering Illinois insurance lawyer license product liability Schaumburg car accident attorney IRA trust transfer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers changes to mortgage law Des Plaines claims law firm Illinois LLC creation POA living trust benefits Schaumburg drug defense lawyer power of attorney Transfer on Death Instrument slip and fall accidents pay when paid contract sexual images ken apicella Illinois real estate Barrington estate planning lawyer Inverness estate planning lawyer college kids Palatine corporate law attorneys Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers traffic violations defense Illinois workers compensation lawyer Schaumburg corporate attorney Illinois employment laws license suspension Illinois pedestrian accident attorney breach of contract Des Plaines tax law firm Arlington Heights criminal lawyer caregiver employment attorney dog bites spinal cord injuries Arlington Heights TBI attorney institutional trustee Des Plaines personal injury attorney Arlington Heights Attorney Palatine personal injury lawyer Chicago corporate attorney traffic tickets Illinois wills and trusts Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney privacy laws fault based insurance Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorneys trust payments drunk driving statistics Palatine corporate attorney no contest clauses Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer civil litigation attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys preventable medical errors Barrington business law firm privacy Schaumburg employment law attorneys Thanksgiving Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Home Remodeling Repair Act subcontractor Buffalo Grove employment lawyer School Visitation Rights Act digital evidence Palatine estate planning lawyer Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Illinois insurance attorney digital information Illinois pet lawyer Illinois boating accident lawyer unauthorized overtime Illinois DUI attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer estate planning disability benefits fatal car accidents jet ski drug crimes lawyer Palatine probate lawyer personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys nursing home negligence license reinstatement Crystal Lake car accident attorney medical malpractice traumatic brain injuries Schaumburg estate planning attorney employment law landlord Barrington personal injury lawyer cell phone Rolling Meadows employment law attorney workplace sexual harassment Illinois collections attorney Illinois small business Illinois personal injury attorney condo personal injury attorney Legal Info agent clemency Illinois defective products attorney dynasty trusts operating agreements real estate zoning ObamaCare forming a corporation in Illinois Inverness insurance attorney Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Retaliatory Discharge Illinois personal injury lawyer independent contractor insurance dispute attorney Rolling Meadows business lawyer life insurance policy Detainer Actions Palatine construction attorney Illinois wills and trusts attorneys digital assets murder Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Schaumburg injury lawyer rent to own real estate contracts criminal law blood alcohol content pedestrian accidents fiduciary rule delay pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Arlington Heights tax lawyer real estate lawyer investment property Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney Long Grove estate planning Illinois Human Rights Act Self-Directed IRA Accounts Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Illinois trusts attorney trauma after an accident pizza emoji Liquor Control Act Palatine real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows tax attorney Family Medical Leave Act marijuana crimes attorney Illinois hands free device federal regulations for LLCs FSLA pet law probate claims process FMLA natural gas life insurance wrongful termination boating DUI probate process Illinois traffic attorney underage DUI uninsured motorist revenge porn Exclusions Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers construction accidents senior citizens Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Long Grove estate planning attorneys speeding pedestrian-automobile accident Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Arlington Heights employment law attorneys car crash eluding a police officer Illinois real estate lawyer dealing with problem employees power of attorney for healthcare Arlington Heights insurance attorney Schaumburg Attorney Illinois estate planning attorney Class A misdemeanor Chicago will attorney health insurance dispute Barrington boating accident attorney bad faith insurance claims Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Illinois criminal defense attorney BUI drug possession reckless homicide medical malpractice compensation premises liability Crystal Lake injury attorney Illinois red light cameras Illinois home inspection Palatine Attorney Barrington civil litigation attorney tax attorney Schaumburg criminal law attorney accidental death benefits life insurance claims Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Palatine punch death Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney field sobriety test liability claims elder law Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys dram shop law Palatine traffic lawyer personal injury accidents special needs trust Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Rolling Meadows Attorney Schaumburg estate planning lawyer probate lawyer severance agreements Schaumburg estate attorney controlled substance Illinois medical malpractice case DUI attorney drug crimes criminal defense GM ignition switches insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Illinois estate planning law firm Des Plaines DUI attorney car crash injuries criminal record Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act meal breaks Arlington Heights traffic attorney Deer Park accident attorney Barrington employment law firm digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, gift taxes brain injury small business deadly crashes Deer Park real estate law firm Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Crystal Lake insurance lawyer texting while driving Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer medical research Illinois employment attorneys IRA benefits Illinois trucking safety DGAA trucking accident lawyers drugs Illinois corporate lawyer income distribution deducation Inverness real estate attorney real estate closing medical marijuana South Barrington real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Inverness corporate attorney Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer holiday statistics Barrington workers compensation attorney work unions insurance claims

Archive