DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

criminal defense minimum wage Illinois medical malpractice case Colin H. Gilbert Barrington litigation attorney Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Inverness probate lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney traffic violations Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument dog bites Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer employee misclassification personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Illinois job attorney Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Schaumburg probate attorney motorcycle accident Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, probate lawyer home inspection lawyer Palatine probate lawyer Buffalo Grove employment lawyer probate criminal record insurance denials workplace sexual harassment Illinois living will Palatine corporate law attorneys gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Schaumburg car accident attorney murder Schaumburg estate planning lawyer controlled substance brain injury Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows employment attorney Illinois employment laws Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Chicago insurance law firm blood alcohol content forming a corporation in Illinois Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Jay Andrew Illinois personal injury attorney Transfer on Death Instrument insurance agent negligence comparative negligence revenge porn Palatine traffic lawyer distracted driving accidents Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Illinois mortgages involuntary manslaughter investment property real estate attorneys IRELA natural gas independent contractor liability claims Schaumburg construction accident lawyer commercial leasing agent Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Schaumburg estate attorney Buffalo Grove law firm Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Des Plaines Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Des Plaines tax law firm insurance attorney preventing accidents Crystal Lake insurance lawyer consent to a search insurance claims Palatine elder law attorney Chicago estate planning lawyer llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Illinois law Long Grove real estate lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers Illinois employment attorneys Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer FSLA denial of life insurance ACA product liability Chicago attorney Illinois workers compensation lawyer Schaumburg wrongful death attorney cell phone tower data life insurance claims Palatine drug lawyer Illinois lawyer Long Grove estate planning Illinois estate planning boating DUI Illinois corporate lawyer trust payments Inverness accident lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Chicago estate planning personal injury accidents workers compensation Illinois workplace discrimination attorney traffic violations defense expungement employee rights insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys truck collisions criminal Deer Park DUI lawyer Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm vacation home denied insurance claims Illinois criminal defense attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer medical malpractice compensation Illinois elder law attorney IRA benefits drug possession Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Inverness civil lawyer marijuana crimes attorney power of attorney for healthcare BAIID drug crime Crystal Lake business law attorneys Des Plaines insurance attorney appealing an insurance claim real estate attorney Crystal Lake law firm accidental death benefits insurance disputes texting and driving Buffalo Grove traffic attorney insurance agents Barrington employment law attorney Illinois traffic ticket lawyer estate planning Chicago insurance claim attorneys license reinstatement Schaumburg personal injury attorney Schaumburg employment law attorneys Illinois LLC creation Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer deed transfer murder charges Illinois will lawyer senior citizens trench injuries hiring employees Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer attorney fees Rolling Meadows criminal attorney blended families Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Crystal Lake accident attorney field sobriety test IRA trust transfer Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Attorney Ken Apicella DUI attorney federal regulations for LLCs overtime pay Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer Schaumburg corporate attorney ObamaCare spinal cord injury spinal cord injuries caregiver Barrington real estate lawyer Illinois employment law attorneys elder abuse life insurance lawyer Barrington estate planning lawyer sexual images Illinois real estate lawyer Chicago biking tips wrongful termination LLCs tax attorney Landlord Tenant Ordinance Chicago will attorney Illinois medical malpractice attorney Rolling Meadows tax attorney child safety loopholes Thanksgiving Deer Park traffic accident attorney insurance dispute attorney federal crimes Des Plaines civil attorney Chicago employment attorney no contest clauses healthcare claims work unions anesthesia errors Barrington criminal lawyer boating under the influence Illinois small business Arlington Heights injury attorney pay when paid contract jet ski Illinois home inspection social media after death Illinois car accident attorney trustee Chicago traffic lawyer Palatine real estate lawyer driving DUI defense Illinois personal injury auto accidents dynasty trusts Des Plaines real estate lawyer food poisoning Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Illinois personal injury lawyer employees Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Inverness real estate lawyer Chicago lawyer breathalyzer test underinsured motorist Deer Park employment law attorney Palatine criminal defense lawyer Rolling Meadows accident lawyer digital information Crystal Lake car accident lawyer elder law Inverness corporate attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer job lawyers modern family estate planning Arlington Heights TBI attorney trucking accident lawyers Barrington employment attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney employment attorney traumatic brain injuries mortgage Schaumburg estate planning attorney Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers rollover car crashes products liability new real estate form low-ball insurance settlement Crystal Lake will lawyer Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Illinois wills and trusts attorneys premises liability creditors Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney disability benefits Mount Prospect elder law attorney unpaid overtime Illinois business lawyer Inverness injury lawyer Barrington employment law firm first degree murder Arlington Heights Attorney Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Illinois employment law firm construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation real estate contract Illinois attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Des Plaines criminal attorney Schaumburg insurance lawyers Illinois employment law healthcare employee discrimination Palatine workers compensation lawyer Illinois trusts attorney income distribution deducation Palatine employment attorney advance healthcare directive medical malpractice claims Arlington Heights lawyer Des Plaines drug lawyer Illinois employment lawyer insurance claim delay health insurance dispute Barrington workers compensation attorney Barrington drug crime attorney estate planning attorney condo condo association Palatine civil litigation lawyer wage theft probate claims process Illinois insurance attorney traffic laws Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Illinois estate planning attorney Deer Park criminal attorney Illinois boating accident lawyer underage DUI irrevocable trust Palatine trusts lawyer traffic deaths taxes foreclosure digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Long Grove estate planning attorneys rollover accidents dram shop law pregnant women estate planning trusts Schaumburg traffic lawyer Des Plaines pet law attorney personal injury attorney severance agreements trauma after an accident Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Legal Info DUI penalities GM ignition switches Illinois injury lawyer Arlington Heights trucking lawyer homestead rights vacation home fines Long Grove estate planning attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyer pedestrian accidents Schaumburg criminal attorney Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney drug crimes eluding a police officer Crystal Lake employment lawyer distracted driving accident victims cell phone Crystal Lake car accident attorney Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Des Plaines real estate attorney traumatic brain injury murder defense car crashes Deer Park accident attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Deer Park real estate law firm Arlington Heights tax lawyer Illinois pet lawyer special needs trust insurance claim dispute attorney personal injury pedestrian-automobile accident license Illinois wills and trusts Forcible Entry surgical mistakes probate fees Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorney employment law, Illinois employment laws Illinois driving without license Illinois traffic accident lawyer Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer filing a medical malpractice claim construction contracts defective products Illinois traffic laws Illinois Human Rights Act Illinois pedestrian accident attorney rest breaks changes to mortgage law Barrington criminal defense lawyer Illinois traffic attorney preventable medical errors South Barrington real estate lawyer personal injury lawyer automated cars Barrington Traffic Lawyer Fair Labor Standards Act employment law Illinois probate lawyer Schaumburg Attorney Barrington medical malpractice lawyers estate planning for college students Rolling Meadows business lawyer FMLA caretaker rights Super Mario Schaumburg elder law lawyer Buffalo Grove injury lawyer owner responsibility TBI Illinois insurance claims lawyers startup company wills employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys Palatine Attorney Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Palatine traffic accidents Illinois insurance disputes insurance denial appeals Palatine construction attorney Des Plaines DUI attorney Illinois trucking safety workers comp School Visitation Rights Act pizza emoji Deer Park traffic lawyer insurance adjusters living trust vs will civil litigation Crystal Lake traffic attorney license suspension Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Arlington Heights accident attorney institutional trustee Employment Discrimination Law Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Illinois Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer nursing home negligence Chicago car accident lawyer DNR employment lawyer fiduciary rule defective products lawyer car accident lawyer Des Plaines collections attorney bad faith insurance claims Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Illinois Sales Representative Act Crystal Lake employment attorney insurance claim denials operating agreements Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers back injuries Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer unpaid assessment slip and fall accidents Palatine civil attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Illinois medical malpractice claim drunk driving Arlington Heights car crash attorneys wrongful death drugs landlord estate plan Affordable Care Act natural gas explosion probate claims Barrington attorney Illinois collections attorney Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Illinois rollover accident lawyers Rolling Meadows traffic offenses IRS insurance claim fault based insurance Barrington injury attorney Chicago corporate attorney breach of contract comp time wills and trusts car crash injuries Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers sexual harassment Self-Directed IRA Accounts Inverness real estate attorney corporate law wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Palatine punch death Illinois registered agent Liquor Control Act capital gains tax workers compensation benefits car accident lawyers Palatine employment law lawyer Home Sale Contingencies Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act POA Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Illinois business law atorneys criminal law bike accident Illinois insurance lawyer Des Plaines injury law firm Palatine personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights real estate lawyer installment contracts insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Arlington Heights employment attorney commercial leases underfunded trust Chicago employment lawyer car crash Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, trucking accidents insurance negligence Illinois tax attorney traffic accidents Crystal Lake pet attorney Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer bicycle accidents Palatine estate planning lawyer foreclosed rental property real estate closing car accidents Rolling Meadows Attorney medical research digital evidence car accident liens icy parking lots BUI Barrington boating accident attorney traffic crimes Do Not Resuscitate civil litigation attorney living wills Buffalo Grove probate lawyer trusts Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers CAM living trust benefits Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Whistleblower Claims cell phone accidents real estate leasing insurance dispute Illinois insurance claim attorney rumble strips Joliet general practice lawyers Illinois insurance dispute lawyers paid sick leave residential real estate Illinois workplace lawyer Long Grove real estate attorney Barrington civil litigation attorney Schaumburg criminal law attorney DUI Palatine injury attorney Inverness insurance attorney contracts medication errors Illinois estate planning law firm deadly crashes medical marijuana real estate lawyer hands free device fiduciary rule delay PTSD Illinois real estate Illinois civil litigation lawyer real estate Fourth of July pain and suffering reckless homicide Chicago trucking accident attorney drug crimes lawyer Inverness DUI lawyer Barrington personal injury attorney motorcycle accident lawyer golf accidents Schaumburg real estate lawyer liability Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer BAC crossover accidents pet bites construction accidents Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney clemency Family Medical Leave Act digital assets unauthorized overtime Illinois employment law attorney pedestrian accident Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney suspended license probate process boating accidents guardianship attorney problem employees Illinois medical malpractice lawyers college kids Palatine law firm Arlington Heights estate planning attorney DGAA real estate zoning denied insurance claim Illinois Smoke Detector Act DMV Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Crystal Lake tax lawyer insurance claim denial digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act life insurance policy Arlington Heights employment law attorneys head on collisions Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers estate attorney gift taxes texting while driving Illinois traffic attorneys life insurance Inverness traffic law firm Illinois bicycle safety internet Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act swimming pools Retaliatory Discharge Des Plaines accident attorney Schaumburg Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer financial advisors unfunded trust Illinois employee rights attorney. privacy laws estate planning lawyer Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers power of attorney Palatine employment lawyer holiday statistics Barrington estate planning attorney estate tax Deer Park workers compensation lawyer hit and run accident rent to own real estate contracts civil rights violation Buffalo Grove real estate attorney South Barrington real estate attorney Barrington personal injury lawyer sole proprietorship Palatine corporate attorney Illinois DUI attorney Colin Gilbert Arlington Heights insurance attorney Crystal Lake injury attorney Schaumburg employment attorney license revocation Illinois red light cameras Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Class A misdemeanor personal injury claim meal breaks Rolling Meadows real estate attorney slip and fall Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer marijuana bicycle dooring accidents Inverness elder law lawyer personal injury law firm pet law traffic tickets fatal car accidents medical malpractice uninsured motorist Mt Prospect Attorney commercial real estate manufacturing speeding business litigation jet ski accidents Rolling Meadows employment law attorney car collision Illinois speeding lawyer insurance claim dispute subcontractor Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Inverness estate planning lawyer mass shooting Des Plaines claims law firm Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney compensatory time living trust Illinois workers compensation attorney Policy Cancellation privacy in terrorem provision Exclusions personal injury claims Barrington business law firm Illinois defective products attorney dealing with problem employees Deer Park personal injury lawyer small business Detainer Actions ken apicella loss of consortium employment contract Buffalo Grove corporate attorney whistleblower protections landlord tenant law drunk driving statistics Palatine business attorney overtime violations Palatine insurance lawyer Home Remodeling Repair Act right to work Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Arlington Heights traffic attorney estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning,

Archive