DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

CAM real estate lawyer bike accident estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, employment law, Illinois employment laws trust payments Exclusions Illinois bicycle safety Palatine elder law attorney Palatine traffic lawyer personal injury claims Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer preventable medical errors trustee filing a medical malpractice claim license car crash Long Grove real estate attorney Kenilworth estate planning attorney fatal car accidents Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer workers compensation benefits pregnant women underage DUI hit and run accident car collision cell phone accidents privacy drugs Illinois registered agent Illinois traffic attorney Schaumburg estate attorney Inverness DUI lawyer Palatine employment attorney Illinois insurance claim attorney Illinois pedestrian accident attorney forming a corporation in Illinois construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Illinois tax attorney Schaumburg criminal attorney Illinois civil litigation lawyer first degree murder manufacturing estate planning Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer traffic deaths Schaumburg injury lawyer tax attorney estate planning lawyer Schaumburg elder law lawyer Illinois wills and trusts Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer POA Palatine workers compensation lawyer life insurance lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers compensatory time Illinois probate lawyer Palatine civil litigation lawyer Illinois employment law attorney murder defense Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Illinois employment law privacy laws Landlord Tenant Ordinance distracted driving accident victims deed transfer appealing an insurance claim sexual harassment Illinois estate planning law firm Inverness real estate lawyer Des Plaines insurance attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, natural gas explosion commercial leases premises liability homestead rights landlord Crystal Lake traffic attorney IRELA boating DUI boating under the influence Illinois pet lawyer in terrorem provision Des Plaines personal injury lawyers living trust vs will Chicago employment lawyer Arlington Heights employment attorney Des Plaines real estate attorney employment attorney insurance agents Forcible Entry Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer South Barrington real estate lawyer estate planning for college students Illinois injury lawyer taxes Chicago lawyer Super Mario marijuana Chicago employment attorney Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer medication errors institutional trustee suspended license Palatine traffic accidents Des Plaines injury law firm BUI criminal reckless homicide personal injury law firm Schaumburg probate attorney natural gas IRA trust transfer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer traffic accidents Illinois personal injury lawyers traffic crimes crossover accidents license reinstatement Illinois workplace discrimination attorney insurance claim Illinois Human Rights Act Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Des Plaines criminal attorney traffic violations defense DMV insurance adjusters Illinois law Legal Info fault based insurance Rolling Meadows Illinois LLC creation Chicago biking tips Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer capital gains tax federal regulations for LLCs consent to a search car crashes Barrington injury attorney Des Plaines accident attorney Illinois construction accident attorney elder abuse Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers attorney fees Home Sale Contingencies Illinois medical malpractice lawyers personal injury accidents Buffalo Grove injury lawyer probate Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Arlington Heights lawyer pet law Palatine personal injury lawyer texting and driving Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer bad faith insurance claims Illinois personal injury lawyer Palatine law firm Illinois insurance claims lawyers Illinois job attorney slip and fall Policy Cancellation Barrington employment law attorney Rolling Meadows employment law attorney rent to own real estate contracts Illinois traffic laws Des Plaines personal injury lawyer overtime violations Illinois living will disability benefits minimum wage Illinois traffic ticket lawyer comp time Colin H. Gilbert estate planning attorney Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Inverness civil lawyer breathalyzer test Des Plaines commercial leasing Colin Gilbert pedestrian-automobile accident spinal cord injuries income distribution deducation Illinois real estate ken apicella guardianship attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Crystal Lake car accident lawyer boating accidents Rolling Meadows traffic attorney distracted driving accidents probate claims process mass shooting FMLA agent jet ski estate planning trusts Arlington Heights accident attorney Illinois trusts attorney digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Inverness probate lawyer Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act criminal record underinsured motorist Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Illinois wrongful termination lawyer cell phone tower data Long Grove estate planning attorneys Illinois traffic attorneys unpaid overtime sole proprietorship Buffalo Grove law firm wrongful termination Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Illinois red light cameras foreclosed rental property Chicago corporate attorney Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney internet fiduciary rule Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Illinois employment laws dog bites license suspension gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys car accident DGAA Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Rolling Meadows Attorney Illinois business law atorneys Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Illinois traffic accident lawyer drug crime Barrington employment law firm pet bites commercial real estate hiring employees Schaumburg estate planning attorney Palatine Attorney Thanksgiving Jay Andrew traffic laws job lawyers Long Grove estate planning attorney Deer Park employment law attorney federal crimes pedestrian accident Schaumburg employment attorney personal injury claim drunk driving civil litigation attorney workers compensation swimming pools insurance denial appeals Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Illinois DUI attorney Barrington Traffic Lawyer trench injuries insurance claim denials Deer Park DUI lawyer School Visitation Rights Act Illinois personal injury expungement Crystal Lake accident attorney right to work Palatine probate lawyer Schaumburg wrongful death attorney field sobriety test Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Fourth of July BAC Crystal Lake employment attorney Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Buffalo Grove employment lawyer personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys meal breaks living wills bicycle dooring accidents liens Do Not Resuscitate Schaumburg personal injury attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer clemency Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Illinois employment law firm insurance attorney icy parking lots life insurance claims bicycle accidents Palatine corporate law attorneys life insurance LLCs license revocation vacation home digital information Inverness insurance attorney products liability Illinois estate planning attorney liability Barrington estate planning attorney Illinois car accident attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney real estate leasing medical marijuana dealing with problem employees medical malpractice Illinois corporate lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Deer Park traffic lawyer traumatic brain injury employee misclassification Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys sexual images speeding Illinois employee rights attorney. Palatine employment law lawyer Chicago traffic lawyer Liquor Control Act Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer preventing accidents condo association surgical mistakes golf accidents Palatine construction attorney jet ski accidents Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute PTSD Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer employee rights Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney Palatine injury attorney insurance claim dispute attorney Illinois criminal defense attorney food poisoning medical research estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers employment contract Illinois business lawyer gift taxes Family Medical Leave Act employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act vacation home fines car accident lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer probate claims insurance claims personal injury new real estate form wage theft Barrington personal injury lawyer Illinois employment law attorneys severance agreements Barrington employment attorney Rolling Meadows tax attorney FSLA Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Crystal Lake traffic lawyer cell phone Arlington Heights traffic attorney wills condo insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Deer Park accident attorney advance healthcare directive Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act estate attorney independent contractor anesthesia errors uninsured motorist traffic tickets Deer Park medical malpractice attorney personal injury attorney Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Barrington boating accident attorney Illinois attorney drug crimes lawyer Barrington real estate lawyer Whistleblower Claims business litigation Crystal Lake tax lawyer small business Arlington Heights injury attorney nursing home negligence Home Remodeling Repair Act digital assets Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys rumble strips Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Illinois personal injury attorney spinal cord injury automated cars Crystal Lake business law attorneys DUI defense operating agreements Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Illinois Sales Representative Act Inverness injury lawyer drug crimes traffic offenses Inverness estate planning lawyer Inverness real estate attorney pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Illinois defective products attorney Arlington Heights TBI attorney Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Deer Park criminal attorney Illinois home inspection Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Barrington estate planning lawyer Des Plaines pet law attorney head on collisions pizza emoji Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Palatine business attorney murder charges Illinois workplace lawyer Illinois employment lawyer Joliet general practice lawyers Illinois insurance lawyer insurance disputes Schaumburg criminal law attorney Transfer on Death Instrument real estate closing workplace sexual harassment Schaumburg employment law attorneys Schaumburg Attorney Inverness traffic law firm traumatic brain injuries Chicago insurance claim attorneys Illinois Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer wrongful death living trust benefits Crystal Lake will lawyer Crystal Lake injury attorney Illinois medical malpractice attorney Palatine insurance lawyer IRA benefits trauma after an accident Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney South Barrington real estate attorney Crystal Lake insurance lawyer back injuries medical malpractice compensation Rolling Meadows employment attorney Detainer Actions social media after death low-ball insurance settlement overtime pay Illinois rollover accident lawyers Illinois insurance attorney healthcare claims Deer Park traffic accident attorney Class A misdemeanor Illinois workers compensation attorney digital evidence special needs trust landlord tenant law insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys medical malpractice claims Des Plaines civil attorney motorcycle accident Mount Prospect elder law attorney marijuana crimes attorney Illinois employment attorneys ObamaCare Employment Discrimination Law Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Illinois estate planning insurance claim delay accidental death benefits slip and fall accidents Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Chicago attorney blood alcohol content fiduciary rule delay underfunded trust drunk driving statistics Inverness elder law lawyer insurance claim denial insurance dispute attorney Crystal Lake pet attorney liability claims Mount Prospect real estate lawyer employees probate lawyer Affordable Care Act Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Barrington personal injury attorney estate tax defective products real estate contract Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Illinois workers compensation lawyer living trust texting while driving unauthorized overtime unfunded trust trucking accident lawyers Des Plaines drug lawyer Retaliatory Discharge Barrington business law firm real estate loss of consortium college kids motorcycle accident lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney mortgage Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer elder law Illinois insurance disputes car accident lawyers Illinois Smoke Detector Act brain injury Barrington attorney defective products lawyer Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Schaumburg insurance lawyers civil rights violation Rolling Meadows accident lawyer real estate zoning trusts Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Arlington Heights employment law attorneys unpaid assessment Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Illinois medical malpractice case workers comp denied insurance claim Des Plaines personal injury attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Illinois lawyer Chicago estate planning lawyer Inverness corporate attorney Rolling Meadows business lawyer Barrington drug crime attorney car accidents Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Mt Prospect Attorney GM ignition switches Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney power of attorney Arlington Heights Attorney work unions Chicago estate planning employment lawyer DUI Arlington Heights tax lawyer trucking accidents residential real estate Crystal Lake car accident attorney Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Arlington Heights criminal lawyer DNR pedestrian accidents foreclosure denied insurance claims Schaumburg car accident attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Illinois medical malpractice claim ACA involuntary manslaughter controlled substance holiday statistics dynasty trusts rest breaks Palatine estate planning lawyer Schaumburg traffic lawyer murder real estate attorneys employee discrimination Long Grove real estate lawyer insurance dispute creditors Schaumburg Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers corporate law car crash injuries Schaumburg real estate lawyer Long Grove estate planning health insurance dispute DUI attorney driving Palatine corporate attorney Barrington workers compensation attorney personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney civil litigation modern family estate planning loopholes Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer installment contracts traffic violations Illinois collections attorney Palatine criminal defense lawyer Palatine employment lawyer DUI penalities Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Arlington Heights personal injury attorney estate plan Self-Directed IRA Accounts Illinois speeding lawyer Palatine trusts lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm paid sick leave Chicago will attorney Illinois driving without license Deer Park real estate law firm employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys breach of contract owner responsibility Illinois will lawyer Illinois elder law attorney Illinois trucking safety changes to mortgage law revenge porn financial advisors Buffalo Grove real estate attorney senior citizens Des Plaines tax law firm Crystal Lake employment lawyer healthcare irrevocable trust Fair Labor Standards Act no contest clauses criminal defense insurance negligence insurance denials Arlington Heights insurance attorney child safety truck collisions Des Plaines DUI attorney auto accidents Palatine punch death blended families Des Plaines claims law firm power of attorney for healthcare caregiver Illinois small business Chicago insurance law firm probate fees insurance claim dispute Barrington litigation attorney whistleblower protections caretaker rights Deer Park personal injury lawyer eluding a police officer deadly crashes Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Arlington Heights estate planning attorney BAIID Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers employment law dram shop law TBI Barrington criminal defense lawyer construction accidents rollover car crashes Des Plaines real estate lawyer Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer home inspection lawyer Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake law firm Palatine drug lawyer product liability real estate attorney life insurance policy medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers problem employees insurance agent negligence Inverness accident lawyer investment property Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers criminal law llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Chicago car accident lawyer Palatine real estate lawyer Des Plaines collections attorney Attorney Ken Apicella Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission hands free device Barrington criminal lawyer Barrington civil litigation attorney Palatine civil attorney startup company Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Illinois real estate lawyer probate process Illinois boating accident lawyer Illinois mortgages Illinois jet ski accident lawyer denial of life insurance drug possession IRS rollover accidents wills and trusts pain and suffering

Archive