DGAA bLAWg

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

Web Admin - Friday, September 18, 2015

sexual harassment in the workplace, Illinois employment law attorneySome of the most damaging and costly issues that develop in the workplace are those related to sexual harassment. When sexual harassment is allowed to occur, it creates an environment that is less productive and opens the possibility for serious lawsuits. It is important for both employers and employees to understand their rights and responsibilities regarding sexual harassment. For employers, it provides a better understanding of what is required and how to prevent harassment. For employees, it serves as guidance for knowing what behavior rises to harassment.  

Harassment in Illinois  

Sexual harassment is prohibited by federal, state, and local law. Under Illinois law, sexual harassment is defined as any sexual advances or requests for sexual favors when they are not welcomed. Additionally, sexual harassment includes any conduct of a sexual nature when:  

1. Submission to such conduct is an implied or express condition of the victim’s employment; 

2. Submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment decisions related to the victim; or 

3. Such conduct substantially interferes with a victim’s work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment. It is a civil rights violation for a person to engage in sexual harassment. 

Further, an employer is considered responsible for the sexual harassment of employees if the employer is aware of the conduct and does not take reasonable corrective measures. While sexual harassment is usually thought of as being sexual in nature, it does not need to be. Sexual harassment occurs when offensive remarks are made about a person’s gender. For example, a woman is sexually harassed if a person makes offensive comments to her about women generally. Victims and harassers can be either a man or a woman. Further, it is also possible for sexual harassment to occur between a victim and a harasser of the same gender.  

Preventing Harassment  

It is the responsibility of the employer to prevent sexual harassment. One of the ways in which this is accomplished is through the adoption and use of a sexual harassment policy. Ordinarily, this policy is part of the employee handbook that all employees should be given. The sexual harassment policy should contain the following: 

1. Definition of sexual harassment;  

2. A statement that harassment will not be tolerated, with disciplinary action for those who commit it; and 

3. A description of the procedure victims should take to file a complaint. Employers should also provide training and education on sexual harassment to both employees and those in supervisory or managerial roles. This training should explain what sexual harassment is, how complaints should be filed, and how complaints should be investigated and addressed.  

Legal Help for Employers and Employees 

For more information about the laws regarding sexual harassment in the workplace, contact a skilled Illinois employment law attorney today. Whether you are an employer or employee, our firm can help. We proudly serve communities throughout the northwest suburbs, including Deer Park, Inverness, Arlington Heights, Barrington, Buffalo Grove, Rolling Meadows, Des Plaines, Palatine, Schaumburg, and Crystal Lake.

      Ken Apicella

      About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.



      Source: 

        http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?ActID=2266&ChapterID=64&SeqStart=600000&SeqEnd=1200000

Employment Discrimination in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, April 30, 2015

employment discrimination in Illinois, Rolling Meadows employment lawyerEmployees are protected from employment discrimination through federal and state laws. While the federal protections are fairly extensive, Illinois state law provides even larger groups of people with protection. Understanding these laws will enable individuals to recognize if they have been discriminated against in relation to employment.

Protected Classes

Through numerous different laws, the federal government prohibits discrimination based on:

  1. 1. Race/Color;

  2. 2. National origin;

  3. 3. Religion;

  4. 4. Sex;

  5. 5. Disability;

  6. 6. Age (for people over 40);

  7. 7. Citizenship status; and

  8. 8. Genetic information

The federal laws provide the minimum protections afforded to individuals. Through its own laws, Illinois provides protection from discrimination based on:

  1. 1. Marital status;

  2. 2. Sexual orientation;

  3. 3. Military status;

  4. 4. Unfavorable military discharge;

  5. 5. Gender identity;

  6. 6. Arrest record; and

  7. 7. Lack of permanent mailing address or using the address of a shelter or social service provider.

The Illinois Department of Human Rights (Department) investigates employment discrimination filed against private employers, state or local government, unions, and employment agencies. A charge of employment discrimination must be filed within 180 days of the alleged discrimination in order to utilize the Department to investigate. Alternatively, an individual can file a claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The Department will only investigate claims against companies with 15 or more employees, unless:

  1. 1. The charge alleges sexual harassment, retaliation, or physical or mental disability discrimination – in these circumstances only one employee subjects the employer to the anti-discrimination law;

  2. 2. The employer is a public contractor, which is defined as an employer who does business with Illinois or a unit of local government; or

  3. 3. The employer is a unit of state government.

Under the Illinois Human Rights Act, it is a civil rights violation for an “employer to refuse to hire, to segregate, or to act with respect to recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, selection for training or apprenticeship, discharge, discipline, tenure or terms, privileges or conditions of employment on the basis of unlawful discrimination or citizenship status.” It is also unlawful for an employer to impose a restriction that has the effect of prohibiting an employee from using a language to communicate in situations unrelated to the employee’s duties.

Illinois law protects against discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, or medical or common conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth. Further, the employer must provide reasonable accommodations when requested by an employee for issues related to pregnancy or childbirth unless the employer can demonstrate that providing such accommodations would impose an undue hardship on the ordinary course of the employer’s business.

Can We Help You?

Employees in Illinois are provided with a great deal of protection from employment discrimination by both federal and state law. If you believe you have been discriminated against in relation to employment, you should speak with an experienced Illinois employment law attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC serves clients throughout the northwest suburbs, including Rolling Meadows, Barrington, and Arlington Heights. 

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

How Courts Determine Damages

Web Admin - Friday, February 27, 2015

personal injury damages, Schaumburg personal injury lawyerThe ultimate goal of personal injury law is to make injured victims whole again. In theory, the law would like to allow people who suffer injuries to collect full compensation for all of the physical, economic, and emotional harms that an accident imposes on them. Of course, there are practical difficulties with doing this, such as accurately measuring emotional harms. Still, the fact that full compensation is the goal of the law is helpful for people's understanding of what damages are available to them in personal injury lawsuits.

What Damages Are Available

The law makes a wide variety of damages available to injured parties. Some of the most straightforward ones to understand are special compensatory damages. These are damages related to specific, easily calculated harms that a person suffered as a result of an accident. For instance, in a case arising out of a car accident, a person could receive special compensatory damages from the person who caused the accident to cover their medical bills and the repair bills for their car. The damages can also work based on prospective harms. For instance, if a victim can prove that their injuries prevented them from returning to work or lowered their ability to earn money, then they can also recover for those sorts of losses.

Courts can also award victims general compensatory damages. Rather than being tied to specific, calculable harms, general compensatory damages are supposed to compensate victims for the emotional harms that they suffer. Theoretically, these damages should be related to a person's pain and suffering, but as a practical matter they tend to be related to the special compensatory damages that a jury awards.

Additionally, courts have the option of awarding punitive damages. These damages are a special class of damages that are only given out rarely. Rather than the other types of damages, which focus on ensuring that victims are paid back for the harm they suffered, punitive damages exist to punish the defendant. The idea is that courts may impose these extra damages to punish defendants for particularly heinous conduct.

Comparative Negligence

Once the court calculates the full amount of the damages, there is another step. The court must determine whether the injured victim was at all responsible for the harms that they suffered. Illinois law reduces the amount of money a victim can recover by the amount of responsibility that they bear for the accident. For instance, if a pedestrian is crossing against a light and gets struck by a drunk driver, the court may find them responsible for some amount of their own injuries. Suppose the court decides that the pedestrian was responsible for 10 percent of their harm; here they can only recover 90 percent of their total damages.

Traffic accidents can lead to life changing injuries. Fortunately, the law gives people options for how to handle these situations. If you were injured in a traffic accident and want to learn more about your rights, contact an Illinois personal injury attorney today. Our firm represents victims in many northwest suburban towns, including Schaumburg, Inverness, and Barrington.

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Rauner Introduces Right to Work Order

Web Admin - Monday, February 23, 2015

Illinois right to work order, Palatine employment law attorneyBefore being elected governor, Gov. Rauner worked in the private sector, and as a result one of the major focuses of his campaign was making the state's economic climate friendlier to businesses. Although he is proposing a variety of changes such as workers' compensation reform that would likely need the approval of the legislature, he has just taken a small step with a recent executive order. The executive order essentially institutes a version of right to work laws for public sector employees, and some commentators think it may be the governor testing the waters for introducing a more general right to work law.

Right to Work Generally

The purpose of right to work laws is to allow workers to choose whether they want to participate in a union. Currently, workers in companies where they would be represented by unions are allowed not to participate in the union, but they still have union dues deducted from their paychecks. From one angle this makes sense, since even non-union workers get the benefits of the union's existence, such as higher wages and better benefits. Forced collection of union dues prevents people from free-riding on the work of other people who pay for and participate in the union. However, there are many employees for whom the union dues represent a significant cost. Public sector employees who would be affected by the governor's order have hundreds of dollars a year taken from their pay for unions. Right to work lets the employees put that money towards the things that they think are most important.

Rauner's Executive Order

For most people, Governor Rauner's executive order does not change anything. It only implements right to work rules for the public sector employees represented by unions. Workers in the private sector will still be required to pay union dues if they were before. Additionally, the new order is being challenged in the courts as an over-extension of the governor's executive authority. The court has put a stay on the enforcement of the order until its constitutionality is decided.

Although the order does not directly affect most employees, it may be a sign of where the governor may be making changes in the future. In the past, right to work laws have not been a major issue in Illinois because, of the surrounding states, only Iowa had one. However, other states in the area have already passed or are moving to pass right to work legislation. These states include Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, and Missouri. This may lead to a stronger push for private sector right to work legislation in Illinois in an effort to prevent businesses from crossing borders into neighboring states.

The field of employment law is constantly changing. If you are worried about whether your business is in compliance with it or you think your rights as an employee are being violated, contact an Illinois employment law attorney today. Our firm serves clients across the northwest suburbs, including in Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Changes to Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Regulations

Web Admin - Friday, February 06, 2015

Illinois wage payment, Rolling Meadows employment lawyerLast year, the Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) made a set of important changes to the regulations it uses to govern the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act. Although these changes are substantive and significant, relatively little has been publicized about the changes. Employers should take note of these new employment regulations to ensure that they are in compliance with the IDOL's new positions on various items, as they can have a serious impact on business operations. The new regulations make a variety of substantive changes, some of which are specific and mechanical, while others are broad and may represent new attitudes about enforcement at the IDOL.

The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act

The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act is a state statute that governs the way that employers are required to pay wages to their employees. These sorts of requirements include things like how often employers must pay their employees, how employers should handle final payments for terminated employees, and how to handle payments for striking workers. As with many laws, they are supported by a set of regulations. Unlike laws, regulations are promulgated by the administrative agencies that are tasked with enforcing the statute. Yet, like laws, regulations still have binding impact on employers, so it is important for employers to keep abreast of changes in the regulations.

The Changed Regulations

The IDOL recently changed the regulations that accompany the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act in a variety of different ways. These are just some of the more important changes.

The new regulations include a sweeping definition of an “agreement” between employees and employers. It means “a manifestation of mutual assent on the part of two or more persons.” The definition goes on to discuss the fact that agreements are broader than contracts and things like employee handbooks and past practices can constitute agreements, even over express disclaimers in some circumstances. This means that employers may end up binding themselves to prior wage practices permanently.

The new regulations also change certain notice and recordkeeping requirements. For instance, the regulations now require employers to provide written notice of a person's wage when they are hired and whenever that rate changes, to the extent possible. Additionally, employers must now keep records of the hours all employees work per week, regardless of whether any of the employees are actually subject to overtime requirements.

These are just some of the changes that the IDOL recently made to the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act regulations. If you are concerned about your company's compliance or believe that your employer is violating your rights as an employee, contact an Illinois employment law attorney today. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC serves many different clients across the northwest suburban area, including in towns like Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Arlington Heights, and Deer Park.

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

New Law Mandates Reasonable Accommodations for Pregnant Women

Web Admin - Thursday, December 11, 2014

pregnant woman wrongful termination, employee rights lawyerDiscrimination against pregnant women in the workforce has long been a concern, and now the Illinois legislature has passed a new law designed to help give women greater protection. The new law modifies the Illinois Human Rights Act, effective starting next year, to more clearly protect pregnant women's rights. The new rights include the right to reasonable accommodation of their pregnancy by their employers, protection from employment discrimination, and protection from forced leave. The law also grants employers some protection from unreasonable demands, such as the ability to refuse accommodations if such accommodations would place an undue hardship on the business.

New Rights for Pregnant Women

The law includes four new rights for “women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or medical or common conditions related to childbirth.” The most legally complex of these rights is the right to a reasonable accommodation of their pregnancy. These accommodations are changes to the employee’s duties or their workspace that allow the employee to perform the “essential duties” of the position. The law provides some examples of these reasonable accommodations, which may include things like more frequent bathroom breaks, private space for breastfeeding, or a modified work schedule.

The law also provides another set of more concrete rights to pregnant women. For instance, employers may not force accommodations onto a pregnant woman if she does not want them, a provision that is likely designed to protect women from being forced to modify or reduce their work schedules. Similarly, the law forbids an employer from forcing a pregnant woman to take maternity leave if she chooses not to.

Employer's Rights

The law also includes a new set of rights for employers that relate to the issue of reasonable accommodation. The first right is that employers can claim that the accommodation the woman is asking for would place an undue hardship on the company. The law defines undue hardship as “an action that is prohibitively expensive or disruptive.” It also provides four factors for judges to consider when determining whether something is an undue hardship:

  1. 1. The nature and cost of the accommodations;
  2. 2. The financial resources of the facility providing the accommodation and the accommodation's impact on the company's operations;
  3. 3. The resources and size of the employer; and
  4. 4. The type of work the employer does.

This provides a highly individualized test that depends greatly on both the specific employer and the accommodation requested. The law also provides the employer with the right to request medical documentation supporting the need for the accommodation.

If you believe that your rights under this new act are being violated or if you are an employer concerned about your obligations under the new law, contact a Crystal Lake employment law attorney today. Our firm helps many northwest suburban employees and businesses in towns like Rolling Meadows, Crystal Lake, Arlington Heights, Inverness, Deer Park, Palatine, and Barrington.

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Payment for Unauthorized Overtime

Web Admin - Friday, September 19, 2014

payment for unauthorized overtime, Palatine employment law attorneyThe law related to wage and hour violations is a complex legal area that touches virtually every employee. These laws lay out employees' rights with regard to things like when they may be paid, how much they must be paid, and the various overtime rules. The overtime rules are some of the most difficult, and can often lead to violations by employers, either knowingly or simply by virtue of not understanding their full complexity. Regardless of the reason for the violation, employees should be aware of their legal rights so that they can enforce them in case something goes wrong.

One of the most common issues that arises with overtime is the idea of “unauthorized overtime.” Many companies have a policy in place that requires employees to get supervisor permission before they work overtime, because overtime switches them to an increased hourly salary. However, this policy can cause confusion when an employee works unauthorized overtime. Some companies refuse to pay workers extra for unauthorized overtime work, but that refusal is a violation of federal law.

The Fair Labor Standards Act

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is the major piece of federal legislation governing things like overtime pay and wage and hour violations. For the purposes of the question about unauthorized overtime, the important section is 203(g), which defines the word employ. A company employs someone when it “suffer[s] or permit[s]” the person to work. Such a broad definition of the word employ means that even if the company has not authorized the overtime hours, they are still allowing the overtime work to happen. The fact that they allowed it at all means that the employee must be paid properly for their time, regardless of any company policy. However, employers are still allowed to take certain steps related to authorizing overtime.

What Employers May Do

Just because employers must pay their workers for unauthorized overtime does not mean that they are not allowed to have a system for approving overtime beforehand. Companies are allowed to decide whether they want their employees working extra time or would rather simply have the project completed at a later date. In fact, companies are even allowed to institute disciplinary procedures related to working overtime without the proper authorization. Yet, even with such procedures in place, if the employee still works overtime, they must be paid accordingly, even if they are also disciplined for violating the company policy related to unauthorized overtime.

Employees who have been the victim of wage and hour violations often feel powerless to stand up to their employers. If you believe that you are owed extra overtime pay, contact a skilled Illinois employment lawyer today. Our dedicated team can help provide you with the backup you need to enforce your legal rights as an employee. We assist clients in Palatine, Des Plaines, Buffalo Grove, and those throughout the suburban Chicagoland area.

About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Overtime Violations in Restaurants

Web Admin - Tuesday, May 27, 2014

illinois overtime violationsWage theft is an increasingly common practice in which employers deprive their workers of wages they are owed through practices like improperly logging their hours or simply failing to pay wages fully and promptly. The problem is serious enough that a report from the Center for Urban Economic Development at the University of Illinois at Chicago estimates that workers in Cook County lose more than one million dollars a day to the practice. One of the most common methods of wage theft is through the violation of overtime laws. Overtime in the restaurant industry is a particular problem because of how overtime rules interact with minimum wage provisions and the tip credit.

Understanding the Tip Credit

The tip credit is a specific exception to minimum wage law that allows employers to pay employees less than minimum wage on the assumption that the worker’s tips will make up the difference. Restaurants are one of the main industries that can take advantage of the tip credit because of their high percentage of tipped employees, such as servers and bartenders.

The exact amount of the tip credit varies by state. In Illinois, employers may deduct up to 40 percent of the Illinois minimum wage as tip credit, giving a new minimum wage of $4.95. The tip credit is a complex piece of the minimum wage law that can give rise to a variety of violations by employers. One of the most complicated of these issues related to the tip credit is how it interacts with overtime law.

The Tip Credit and Overtime

Generally speaking, overtime laws require employers to pay their workers one and a half times their hourly wage for working more than 40 hours in a week. However, restaurants and other employers can still take advantage of the tip credit. Unfortunately, many do so incorrectly. The issue is that many employers take the tip credit out before multiplying the hourly wage by one and a half, when they should take it out after. To illustrate the difference, suppose a server works 60 hours in one week and is paid $4.95 an hour plus tips.

For the first 40 hours, the employer can simply pay the $4.95, but for the last 20 they need to start paying overtime. The incorrect way to do the calculation would be to simply multiply the $4.95 wage by 1.5 giving a new wage of $7.43, which would result in a paycheck of $148.60 for those 20 hours. The proper way to perform the calculation is to multiply the full minimum wage, $8.25, by 1.5 to get $12.38, and then subtract the tip credit afterwards to get a minimum wage of $9.08 and a paycheck of $181.60, a serious difference from the incorrect calculation.

If you believe you have been the victim of an overtime violation, contact an Illinois employment lawyer today. Our firm helps clients in many towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Palatine, Barrington, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Common Methods of Wage Theft

Web Admin - Tuesday, February 11, 2014

illinois wage theft lawyerMore and more employees are facing issues related to wage theft. Even though many are not aware of what the term actually mean, legal claims related to it have been steadily rising in recent years.

Broadly speaking, wage theft happens when an employer illegally deprives an employee of wages that they are owed. In some cases that can mean subverting laws that guarantee certain benefits to employees, like the minimum wage law, while in others it can simply mean not abiding by the agreement between the employer and the employee, both of which are violations of the law. Wage theft can be broken down into two categories based on the method the employer uses, methods relating to simply depriving the worker of money they are owed, and methods relating to improperly documenting the worker or their pay.

Wage Deprivation

Wage deprivation methods involve improper payroll practices designed to deprive an employee of their pay. The simplest method of this is an employer’s failure to pay their employees on time. This can include tactics like withholding an employee’s last paycheck or paying them for only certain hours or days worked, rather than paying for all their time.

One common, similar method of wage theft involves withholding overtime pay. Under the Fair Labor Standards act, many employees are entitled to overtime if they work more than 40 hours a week. Employers often take advantage of confusion among employees as to whether they qualify and refuse to pay overtime. Fortunately, the Department of Labor maintains a guide explaining worker’s overtime rights.

Documentation Issues

Documentation issues are a slightly subtler version of wage theft. Rather than simply withholding wages, employers will adjust their payroll or misclassify employees to stop paying them everything that the employer owes them. One of the simplest documentation violations is agreeing to pay someone below the minimum wage ($8.25 currently), which is illegal. Employers may also adopt improper policies related to clocking-in, like forcing employees to work for a period in the morning before they start logging hours. These sorts of policies qualify as wage theft since employers owe employees for that time.

Additionally, employers could improperly classify their employees as independent contractors. Independent contractor is a specific legal status related to the amount of freedom a worker has to set their hours and perform tasks as they see fit. Most workers a business hires will not fall into this category, but an employer may try to label employees as this since it allows the employer to avoid things like workers compensation insurance and payroll tax by shifting the burden to the worker.

If you believe you have been a victim of wage theft, or have questions about your employer’s practices, get in contact with an Illinois employment lawyer. We serve clients in areas across the northwest suburbs such as Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.


Recent Posts


Tags

Illinois employment attorneys Illinois employment laws right to work automated cars Illinois construction accident attorney condo association PTSD Inverness real estate attorney Home Sale Contingencies Legal Info digital information employment contract Buffalo Grove corporate attorney living trust vs will traffic deaths Crystal Lake employment attorney rollover accidents Rolling Meadows accident lawyer life insurance special needs trust Crystal Lake car accident attorney liability claims Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney home inspection lawyer Des Plaines collections attorney Mount Prospect real estate lawyer employee misclassification disability benefits Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers personal injury claim expungement motorcycle accident lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyer anesthesia errors Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Illinois trusts attorney golf accidents Illinois real estate Crystal Lake business law attorneys Fair Labor Standards Act Deer Park real estate law firm bike accident Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer murder defense bicycle dooring accidents Palatine personal injury lawyer internet real estate contract Illinois lawyer Crystal Lake accident attorney trench injuries power of attorney Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality trusts Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Crystal Lake tax lawyer IRA trust transfer Illinois defective products attorney Illinois car accident attorney car accident medical malpractice compensation employment law spinal cord injuries Colin Gilbert Des Plaines drug lawyer wrongful death car crashes Rolling Meadows employment attorney financial advisors Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney slip and fall accidents landlord tenant law wage theft Retaliatory Discharge sexual harassment Whistleblower Claims Palatine business attorney Crystal Lake traffic lawyer speeding Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer accidental death benefits capital gains tax Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Palatine injury attorney suspended license Palatine Attorney South Barrington real estate attorney Illinois insurance disputes Riverwoods estate planning lawyer products liability Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Illinois workers compensation attorney nursing home negligence liability Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney ObamaCare Illinois Human Rights Act Inverness accident lawyer Illinois traffic laws loopholes underfunded trust workers comp car crash murder privacy jet ski Schaumburg criminal attorney insurance claim dispute digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Illinois traffic accident lawyer attorney fees Palatine corporate law attorneys slip and fall Illinois law commercial leases in terrorem provision texting and driving Arlington Heights TBI attorney Crystal Lake pet attorney Palatine traffic accidents Chicago lawyer wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney mortgage Illinois workers compensation lawyer Illinois driving without license living wills Chicago car accident lawyer boating under the influence overtime pay pet bites college kids Illinois business law atorneys Long Grove estate planning attorney wills Illinois elder law attorney Mount Prospect elder law attorney insurance dispute Palatine traffic lawyer insurance negligence Do Not Resuscitate Barrington estate planning attorney hands free device DMV Des Plaines injury law firm Super Mario rest breaks Joliet general practice lawyers estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, real estate attorney comparative negligence Illinois medical malpractice attorney deed transfer Illinois medical malpractice claim Palatine law firm holiday statistics Mt Prospect Attorney license reinstatement traffic crimes blood alcohol content trust payments Schaumburg criminal law attorney Arlington Heights tax lawyer defective products lawyer LLCs tax attorney traumatic brain injury underinsured motorist foreclosed rental property health insurance dispute Employment Discrimination Law Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Schaumburg employment law attorneys Palatine drug lawyer Affordable Care Act privacy laws workers compensation benefits Palatine trusts lawyer distracted driving accident victims drug crime loss of consortium wills and trusts swimming pools Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Inverness corporate attorney employees Illinois insurance lawyer Illinois red light cameras Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers insurance dispute attorney Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer landlord Arlington Heights real estate lawyer natural gas fatal car accidents GM ignition switches probate claims liens Illinois living will Des Plaines tax law firm Rolling Meadows business lawyer sole proprietorship Barrington business law firm traffic tickets Illinois personal injury Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Barrington criminal lawyer Thanksgiving Palatine probate lawyer senior citizens unfunded trust drugs Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Illinois employment law Arlington Heights estate planning attorney cell phone tower data insurance claims dog bites new real estate form Des Plaines personal injury lawyer preventable medical errors Illinois injury lawyer Illinois Sales Representative Act Illinois wills and trusts Des Plaines real estate attorney subcontractor Inverness elder law lawyer Illinois DUI attorney Jay Andrew BAC Illinois corporate lawyer mass shooting preventing accidents insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Illinois pet lawyer brain injury personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys drug crimes lawyer Palatine construction attorney pizza emoji Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney owner responsibility Illinois will lawyer elder law independent contractor job lawyers Schaumburg car accident attorney llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Long Grove estate planning attorneys Illinois collections attorney Chicago insurance law firm back injuries Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Illinois wrongful termination lawyer license reckless homicide bicycle accidents Illinois insurance claim attorney Illinois estate planning gift taxes Deer Park personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights injury attorney vacation home Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission power of attorney for healthcare Palatine employment law lawyer Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Chicago employment attorney pedestrian-automobile accident pedestrian accidents premises liability Illinois civil litigation lawyer ken apicella trauma after an accident involuntary manslaughter digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, investment property Des Plaines real estate lawyer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney eluding a police officer fiduciary rule delay Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Illinois workplace discrimination attorney small business car collision federal regulations for LLCs Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Inverness probate lawyer civil rights violation comp time fault based insurance problem employees estate tax Illinois attorney employee discrimination Des Plaines criminal attorney Barrington Traffic Lawyer breathalyzer test marijuana crimes attorney Illinois insurance attorney Illinois personal injury lawyers Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Long Grove real estate attorney Chicago estate planning lawyer Palatine workers compensation lawyer Schaumburg estate attorney compensatory time crossover accidents Palatine estate planning lawyer construction accidents Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer insurance disputes Chicago employment lawyer Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Schaumburg estate planning attorney Illinois mortgages criminal Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Des Plaines DUI attorney Des Plaines personal injury attorney overtime violations traffic violations Chicago traffic lawyer CAM Arlington Heights Attorney icy parking lots insurance claim denials appealing an insurance claim Barrington criminal defense lawyer Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney insurance claim dispute attorney Deer Park accident attorney Des Plaines civil attorney digital assets Home Remodeling Repair Act estate attorney income distribution deducation personal injury law firm Arlington Heights lawyer drunk driving employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys DUI defense Inverness insurance attorney Illinois tax attorney Rolling Meadows Palatine elder law attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney employment lawyer controlled substance Des Plaines claims law firm Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Buffalo Grove law firm Illinois employment law firm dealing with problem employees Deer Park traffic accident attorney probate process food poisoning Rolling Meadows traffic law firm surgical mistakes BAIID real estate closing Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer pain and suffering Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Schaumburg real estate lawyer irrevocable trust Crystal Lake traffic attorney Illinois speeding lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorney Policy Cancellation Schaumburg elder law lawyer Illinois employment law attorney Illinois estate planning attorney drug crimes Chicago corporate attorney Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Inverness civil lawyer gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act field sobriety test hit and run accident Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Illinois real estate lawyer sexual images civil litigation attorney personal injury claims operating agreements Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys ACA insurance denials Inverness DUI lawyer medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers IRS BUI real estate zoning Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer work unions dynasty trusts Crystal Lake will lawyer life insurance lawyer Colin H. Gilbert cell phone Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm jet ski accidents Schaumburg probate attorney Illinois boating accident lawyer life insurance policy Barrington boating accident attorney workers compensation Illinois traffic attorneys rumble strips Arlington Heights accident attorney defective products Illinois small business unpaid assessment Illinois home inspection Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Des Plaines pet law attorney insurance claim residential real estate healthcare business litigation Barrington employment law attorney Illinois pedestrian accident attorney marijuana Chicago will attorney FMLA Barrington estate planning lawyer Illinois Smoke Detector Act insurance claim denial medical marijuana IRELA Barrington employment attorney driving corporate law Barrington personal injury attorney Family Medical Leave Act Schaumburg insurance lawyers Inverness personal injury attorney medical research medical malpractice Illinois business lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney wrongful termination insurance claim delay Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer civil litigation personal injury lawyer Schaumburg Attorney employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Illinois rollover accident lawyers DNR Barrington employment law firm Schaumburg drug defense lawyer medication errors cell phone accidents drunk driving statistics workplace sexual harassment living trust benefits car accident lawyer Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Barrington civil litigation attorney Barrington litigation attorney real estate lawyer auto accidents FSLA Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer probate lawyer startup company rollover car crashes Illinois probate lawyer Rolling Meadows tax attorney blended families Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Arlington Heights employment attorney traffic violations defense Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys forming a corporation in Illinois insurance agents car accident lawyers trustee Attorney Ken Apicella Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Schaumburg personal injury attorney social media after death DGAA Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers changes to mortgage law first degree murder consent to a search life insurance claims dram shop law Palatine employment lawyer Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer criminal defense Inverness injury lawyer denial of life insurance Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer medical malpractice claims Palatine corporate attorney Chicago estate planning foreclosure criminal law car crash injuries Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Illinois job attorney Des Plaines Inverness estate planning lawyer Des Plaines accident attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Crystal Lake injury attorney Illinois construction contracts DUI employment attorney Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Schaumburg civil litigation attorney commercial leasing real estate probate boating accidents Rolling Meadows traffic attorney guardianship attorney Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Long Grove estate planning breach of contract Barrington injury attorney natural gas explosion car accidents elder abuse Rolling Meadows Attorney Palatine real estate lawyer Exclusions pedestrian accident estate plan Barrington attorney texting while driving advance healthcare directive pay when paid contract Deer Park medical malpractice attorney probate fees Schaumburg injury lawyer trucking accident lawyers Fourth of July probate claims process Illinois medical malpractice case unauthorized overtime clemency Palatine employment attorney murder charges hiring employees DUI attorney personal injury accidents Barrington drug crime attorney Kenilworth estate planning lawyer license suspension minimum wage contracts Rolling Meadows probate lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney criminal record Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers caretaker rights denied insurance claims IRA benefits Self-Directed IRA Accounts modern family estate planning Long Grove real estate lawyer estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Palatine criminal defense lawyer no contest clauses caregiver low-ball insurance settlement Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer traffic offenses Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act healthcare claims Illinois medical malpractice lawyers traumatic brain injuries estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers motorcycle accident Arlington Heights criminal lawyer personal injury attorney Inverness traffic law firm insurance agent negligence Arlington Heights traffic attorney Liquor Control Act Crystal Lake employment law attorney POA Class A misdemeanor construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation underage DUI creditors meal breaks Illinois criminal defense attorney traffic accidents Inverness real estate lawyer vacation home fines Transfer on Death Instrument Chicago attorney Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys whistleblower protections real estate attorneys Arlington Heights insurance attorney Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Deer Park traffic lawyer Illinois personal injury attorney Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer insurance adjusters Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer TBI revenge porn estate planning Crystal Lake law firm Palatine civil attorney Illinois employee rights attorney. spinal cord injury uninsured motorist Illinois employment lawyer Palatine insurance lawyer pet law Des Plaines insurance attorney Schaumburg license revocation Chicago insurance claim attorneys Illinois personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer denied insurance claim truck collisions Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney insurance attorney Landlord Tenant Ordinance Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer product liability Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Crystal Lake employment lawyer Barrington personal injury lawyer child safety Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer fiduciary rule Illinois employment law attorneys installment contracts filing a medical malpractice claim School Visitation Rights Act personal injury Barrington workers compensation attorney homestead rights drug possession digital evidence estate planning for college students Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Illinois traffic attorney Palatine punch death commercial real estate pregnant women boating DUI bad faith insurance claims traffic laws Deer Park DUI lawyer Detainer Actions deadly crashes South Barrington real estate lawyer Deer Park employment law attorney Chicago biking tips unpaid overtime rent to own real estate contracts employee rights living trust insurance denial appeals federal crimes taxes Illinois insurance claims lawyers Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers real estate leasing condo Illinois workplace lawyer head on collisions estate planning attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer paid sick leave Illinois registered agent estate planning trusts Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Forcible Entry distracted driving accidents employment law, Illinois employment laws Illinois trucking safety manufacturing DUI penalities Schaumburg employment attorney Illinois LLC creation Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Barrington real estate lawyer Illinois estate planning law firm Illinois bicycle safety institutional trustee agent trucking accidents Palatine civil litigation lawyer Schaumburg wrongful death attorney severance agreements Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys

Archive