DGAA bLAWg

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.

Legally Possessing Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Friday, December 06, 2013

On August 1st, 2013, the Illinois legislature passed The Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, which allows the use of medical marijuana in Illinois. This bill, which goes into effect on January 1st of next year, expands access to marijuana for those with certain medical conditions. However, the law keeps it illegal for recreational purposes, and tries to maintain public safety by carefully regulating who uses the drug and how much is allowed.

Rules on Marijuana Use

The state legislature placed several restrictions on the legality of medical marijuana. The law allows people to obtain marijuana only if they have one of 33 illnesses listed in the Act. However, the law also gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) the authority to add new diseases to the list as they see fit. The Act further limits the use of medical marijuana to people over the age of 18 who do not have a prior felony conviction. The legislature also attempted to control the spread of marijuana by requiring an Illinois ID card or driver’s license, so that people cannot travel to Illinois from other states just to get marijuana. Additionally, the Act forbids the use of marijuana in front of minor children.

How to Obtain Medical Marijuana

The process for acquiring medical marijuana eligibility contains three steps. First, a doctor must diagnose the patient with one of the 33 listed conditions, which include, among other diseases, cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS, MS, and various pain disorders. Once the doctor diagnoses a patient with an eligible disorder, the patient can go to a medical marijuana clinic or other specialist to acquire a doctor’s recommendation for medical marijuana. The patient then takes that recommendation to the IDPH who will issue them an ID card that allows them to purchase medical marijuana.

Once the patient becomes eligible for medical marijuana, they can take their ID card to one of 60 state-regulated dispensaries, and use it to purchase up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana every two weeks. Patients should keep in mind that the state heavily controls the supply of medical marijuana, which means that it may take a few months after the bill goes into effect before the medical marijuana actually becomes available.

Legal Help

If you have questions about the legality of medical marijuana, or have been charged with a crime related to medical marijuana, contact an experienced Chicago drug defense attorney today. We serve many areas in the northwest suburbs including Schaumburg, Barrington, Des Plaines, Deer Park, Buffalo Grove, and more.


Recent Posts


Tags

Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Schaumburg real estate lawyer spinal cord injury estate planning lawyer food poisoning unfunded trust Barrington employment law firm Illinois car accident attorney overtime pay Illinois insurance claims lawyers pizza emoji Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Arlington Heights traffic attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyer installment contracts appealing an insurance claim Illinois business lawyer pedestrian-automobile accident insurance claim denial estate plan Crystal Lake car accident attorney Illinois employment attorneys Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Schaumburg corporate attorney agent employees Schaumburg criminal attorney criminal record irrevocable trust trauma after an accident special needs trust Thanksgiving Schaumburg Attorney accidental death benefits Illinois collections attorney probate process Palatine drug lawyer Illinois employment law firm real estate closing Buffalo Grove injury lawyer commercial real estate Palatine business attorney Illinois rollover accident lawyers Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Schaumburg injury lawyer Palatine corporate law attorneys coronavirus Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers slip and fall Kenilworth estate planning attorney LLCs drugs personal injury accidents underinsured motorist Illinois living will real estate condo association DUI penalities rumble strips Arlington Heights criminal lawyer medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers brain injury wills defective products lawyer Des Plaines claims law firm Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers estate planning trusts no contest clauses Barrington personal injury attorney living wills Illinois defective products attorney employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, IRELA overtime violations fault based insurance Illinois mortgages Transfer on Death Instrument Illinois llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney traffic offenses Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Des Plaines collections attorney workplace sexual harassment Illinois personal injury lawyer personal injury claim spinal cord injuries real estate leasing Arlington Heights accident attorney Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer mortgage traffic laws Des Plaines accident attorney Barrington employment law attorney trucking accidents medication errors Rolling Meadows rollover car crashes power of attorney Illinois injury lawyer revenge porn Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers murder defense Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Crystal Lake pet attorney insurance claim delay Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Rolling Meadows employment attorney deed transfer Deer Park accident attorney Illinois traffic accident lawyer gift taxes Arlington Heights injury attorney wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney attorney fees Deer Park employment law attorney distracted driving accidents Inverness real estate lawyer drug crimes lawyer ObamaCare independent contractor Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Illinois workplace lawyer probate claims process Illinois lawyer hands free device denial of life insurance in terrorem provision employee misclassification denied insurance claims Palatine probate lawyer wrongful termination uninsured motorist Illinois home inspection Liquor Control Act elder abuse Crystal Lake law firm Barrington litigation attorney Schaumburg elder law lawyer estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Inverness injury lawyer motorcycle accident lawyer golf accidents Schaumburg wrongful death attorney Deer Park real estate law firm Barrington boating accident attorney Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers eluding a police officer Illinois medical malpractice case natural gas explosion insurance agents driving digital evidence underage DUI Illinois LLC creation employment law college kids Des Plaines insurance attorney subcontractor Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents field sobriety test Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer IRA trust transfer license revocation Rolling Meadows business lawyer Chicago estate planning lawyer Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Illinois employment laws Rolling Meadows Attorney Chicago car accident lawyer Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Chicago traffic lawyer employee rights insurance disputes insurance claim dispute attorney drug crime Crystal Lake accident attorney Chicago attorney unauthorized overtime estate tax ACA Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Chicago corporate attorney job lawyers Schaumburg car accident attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Crystal Lake employment attorney Rolling Meadows employment law attorney license reinstatement swimming pools traffic violations defense employee discrimination medical malpractice compensation privacy Illinois civil litigation lawyer Barrington business law firm boating accidents medical malpractice medical malpractice claims Crystal Lake injury attorney slip and fall accidents Illinois insurance disputes auto accidents car crash injuries Long Grove real estate lawyer vacation home hiring employees Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Legal Info Do Not Resuscitate cell phone tower data first degree murder drunk driving statistics insurance claims life insurance policy Des Plaines tax law firm marijuana crimes attorney Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Landlord Tenant Ordinance fatal car accidents Illinois criminal defense attorney Retaliatory Discharge Illinois pet lawyer traffic violations Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Schaumburg probate attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute speeding medical marijuana fiduciary rule privacy laws Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, license Chicago employment attorney Illinois probate lawyer Schaumburg criminal law attorney healthcare claims Palatine employment law lawyer Chicago insurance law firm taxes disability benefits Barrington injury attorney traumatic brain injury Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Jay Andrew Inverness civil lawyer Barrington drug crime attorney consent to a search Illinois Sales Representative Act Barrington real estate lawyer CAM traumatic brain injuries capital gains tax Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Illinois employee rights attorney. federal crimes employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys elder law pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality internet Des Plaines personal injury lawyers car accident Palatine civil litigation lawyer Palatine construction attorney Deer Park workers compensation lawyer dram shop law estate planning for college students murder charges Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Barrington criminal lawyer Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument filing a medical malpractice claim Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer bicycle dooring accidents Barrington attorney distracted driving accident victims Inverness insurance attorney Deer Park traffic accident attorney real estate zoning truck collisions denied insurance claim severance agreements Palatine law firm Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Des Plaines DUI attorney Inverness real estate attorney Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney Illinois traffic ticket lawyer holiday statistics trust payments wills and trusts underfunded trust South Barrington real estate lawyer work unions motorcycle accident advance healthcare directive personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Illinois estate planning law firm rollover accidents Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Colin H. Gilbert Arlington Heights employment attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer POA Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Illinois insurance claim attorney senior citizens Chicago insurance claim attorneys Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act civil rights violation anesthesia errors bicycle accidents financial advisors GM ignition switches Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys back injuries Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Illinois elder law attorney automated cars landlord Barrington employment attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyers life insurance Rolling Meadows traffic attorney boating under the influence civil litigation attorney personal injury Illinois insurance attorney pay when paid contract Inverness accident lawyer Exclusions Super Mario Schaumburg insurance lawyers pet law tax attorney insurance claim denials DUI murder Crystal Lake traffic lawyer employment contract Policy Cancellation clemency insurance claim dispute Schaumburg personal injury attorney Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Long Grove estate planning drug possession Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Illinois Human Rights Act Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Illinois insurance lawyer drug crimes Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Deer Park DUI lawyer Illinois tax attorney products liability Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer insurance denials texting and driving Palatine estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm paid sick leave license suspension Colin Gilbert estate planning insurance attorney Chicago will attorney suspended license Illinois registered agent Arlington Heights TBI attorney guardianship attorney forming a corporation in Illinois Deer Park traffic lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Deer Park personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights insurance attorney Illinois traffic laws Inverness personal injury attorney Palatine punch death Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Palatine corporate attorney insurance agent negligence Detainer Actions Joliet general practice lawyers probate Barrington workers compensation attorney Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Mount Prospect elder law attorney Chicago lawyer blended families Forcible Entry Illinois red light cameras Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Palatine workers compensation lawyer Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys IRS Illinois workers compensation lawyer Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake employment lawyer criminal DGAA Long Grove real estate attorney whistleblower protections Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Schaumburg estate attorney Illinois speeding lawyer liability new real estate form insurance dispute attorney real estate attorney Affordable Care Act Family Medical Leave Act drunk driving Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers foreclosed rental property life insurance claims car crashes Schaumburg employment attorney Schaumburg employment law attorneys DUI defense Des Plaines Illinois estate planning traffic accidents Des Plaines criminal attorney criminal defense Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers insurance claim Barrington criminal defense lawyer Illinois employment law Palatine injury attorney child safety low-ball insurance settlement employment attorney Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Fourth of July hit and run accident residential real estate institutional trustee marijuana pain and suffering digital assets Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Inverness DUI lawyer texting while driving investment property pedestrian accidents insurance adjusters trench injuries head on collisions Whistleblower Claims Deer Park criminal attorney unpaid overtime medical research Schaumburg traffic lawyer dynasty trusts Palatine personal injury lawyer Illinois medical malpractice attorney Long Grove estate planning attorneys Palatine insurance lawyer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer personal injury lawyer Schaumburg drug defense lawyer employment lawyer PTSD Inverness elder law lawyer health insurance dispute employment law, Illinois employment laws Illinois job attorney Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Des Plaines injury law firm workers compensation benefits Illinois personal injury lawyers Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney involuntary manslaughter Des Plaines real estate lawyer changes to mortgage law Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Crystal Lake business law attorneys Rolling Meadows tax attorney Des Plaines personal injury attorney digital information Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Illinois traffic attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer crossover accidents icy parking lots condo car collision Illinois boating accident lawyer Crystal Lake traffic attorney estate planning attorney Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Barrington Traffic Lawyer meal breaks Palatine real estate lawyer dealing with problem employees Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers BAC Illinois law estate attorney Illinois employment law attorneys Illinois personal injury Self-Directed IRA Accounts Class A misdemeanor Illinois construction accident attorney FSLA digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Barrington estate planning lawyer Buffalo Grove law firm Arlington Heights lawyer wrongful death South Barrington real estate attorney BUI contracts reckless homicide Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer real estate lawyer Attorney Ken Apicella foreclosure probate claims creditors Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Des Plaines drug lawyer Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Arlington Heights Attorney Schaumburg estate planning attorney Home Remodeling Repair Act premises liability landlord tenant law small business trusts pedestrian accident Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer social media after death Palatine elder law attorney Illinois business law atorneys DNR Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer natural gas ken apicella Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Rolling Meadows probate lawyer jet ski accidents probate lawyer Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act defective products life insurance lawyer expungement pregnant women cell phone accidents Palatine employment attorney traffic deaths Crystal Lake tax lawyer Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Illinois small business Chicago employment lawyer workers comp Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney right to work preventable medical errors trucking accident lawyers Illinois Smoke Detector Act Illinois trusts attorney car accident lawyers Illinois DUI attorney insurance dispute Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer car accidents minimum wage traffic tickets Barrington personal injury lawyer Illinois workers compensation attorney problem employees Des Plaines pet law attorney compensatory time loopholes unpaid assessment surgical mistakes deadly crashes Illinois bicycle safety civil litigation wage theft product liability Illinois estate planning attorney Illinois driving without license DUI attorney Palatine traffic lawyer rent to own real estate contracts TBI bad faith insurance claims traffic crimes Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Illinois traffic attorneys personal injury attorney Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Schaumburg civil litigation attorney vacation home fines Inverness traffic law firm blood alcohol content commercial leases living trust benefits pet bites real estate contract Home Sale Contingencies comp time probate fees IRA benefits federal regulations for LLCs owner responsibility personal injury law firm controlled substance Illinois employment law attorney Inverness probate lawyer Illinois personal injury attorney corporate law Des Plaines real estate attorney sexual harassment homestead rights Palatine employment lawyer Chicago estate planning breach of contract business litigation power of attorney for healthcare Illinois real estate lawyer boating DUI BAIID Illinois trucking safety School Visitation Rights Act Chicago biking tips Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Palatine Attorney real estate attorneys construction accidents healthcare liability claims Arlington Heights tax lawyer cell phone Long Grove estate planning attorney estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers car crash Employment Discrimination Law mass shooting Crystal Lake employment law attorney manufacturing personal injury claims Illinois Trust Code DMV insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Palatine criminal defense lawyer loss of consortium caretaker rights Palatine traffic accidents Illinois wills and trusts sole proprietorship Palatine trusts lawyer dog bites rest breaks Schaumburg Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Des Plaines civil attorney Illinois will lawyer commercial leasing car accident lawyer criminal law insurance negligence modern family estate planning Buffalo Grove employment lawyer construction contracts Mt Prospect Attorney income distribution deducation jet ski Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Barrington estate planning attorney Chicago trucking accident attorney home inspection lawyer comparative negligence nursing home negligence FMLA Illinois employment lawyer Inverness corporate attorney workers compensation Fair Labor Standards Act breathalyzer test sexual images liens operating agreements startup company Crystal Lake will lawyer trustee gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Illinois medical malpractice claim fiduciary rule delay bike accident Barrington civil litigation attorney Illinois corporate lawyer Palatine civil attorney insurance denial appeals living trust insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys preventing accidents Illinois attorney living trust vs will Illinois real estate Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers caregiver

Archive