Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.


The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.


Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.

Legally Possessing Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Friday, December 06, 2013

On August 1st, 2013, the Illinois legislature passed The Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, which allows the use of medical marijuana in Illinois. This bill, which goes into effect on January 1st of next year, expands access to marijuana for those with certain medical conditions. However, the law keeps it illegal for recreational purposes, and tries to maintain public safety by carefully regulating who uses the drug and how much is allowed.

Rules on Marijuana Use

The state legislature placed several restrictions on the legality of medical marijuana. The law allows people to obtain marijuana only if they have one of 33 illnesses listed in the Act. However, the law also gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) the authority to add new diseases to the list as they see fit. The Act further limits the use of medical marijuana to people over the age of 18 who do not have a prior felony conviction. The legislature also attempted to control the spread of marijuana by requiring an Illinois ID card or driver’s license, so that people cannot travel to Illinois from other states just to get marijuana. Additionally, the Act forbids the use of marijuana in front of minor children.

How to Obtain Medical Marijuana

The process for acquiring medical marijuana eligibility contains three steps. First, a doctor must diagnose the patient with one of the 33 listed conditions, which include, among other diseases, cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS, MS, and various pain disorders. Once the doctor diagnoses a patient with an eligible disorder, the patient can go to a medical marijuana clinic or other specialist to acquire a doctor’s recommendation for medical marijuana. The patient then takes that recommendation to the IDPH who will issue them an ID card that allows them to purchase medical marijuana.

Once the patient becomes eligible for medical marijuana, they can take their ID card to one of 60 state-regulated dispensaries, and use it to purchase up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana every two weeks. Patients should keep in mind that the state heavily controls the supply of medical marijuana, which means that it may take a few months after the bill goes into effect before the medical marijuana actually becomes available.

Legal Help

If you have questions about the legality of medical marijuana, or have been charged with a crime related to medical marijuana, contact an experienced Chicago drug defense attorney today. We serve many areas in the northwest suburbs including Schaumburg, Barrington, Des Plaines, Deer Park, Buffalo Grove, and more.

Recent Posts


DMV Long Grove estate planning attorney homestead rights Family Medical Leave Act Schaumburg changes to mortgage law Palatine injury attorney Rolling Meadows traffic attorney trust payments estate attorney dog bites real estate closing new real estate form Deer Park traffic lawyer probate fees Inverness traffic law firm blood alcohol content wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Crystal Lake traffic lawyer comp time insurance claim denials Whistleblower Claims real estate Barrington drug crime attorney insurance claim Arlington Heights accident attorney medication errors Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Des Plaines personal injury lawyers tax attorney Illinois speeding lawyer Landlord Tenant Ordinance pet law Jay Andrew Illinois Smoke Detector Act real estate leasing Crystal Lake employment lawyer Illinois medical malpractice lawyers medical malpractice Illinois mortgages Super Mario insurance claim denial overtime violations Schaumburg personal injury lawyer manufacturing life insurance claims estate planning Kenilworth estate planning attorneys license reinstatement commercial leasing Crystal Lake traffic attorney probate Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Schaumburg Attorney preventing accidents IRS paid sick leave truck collisions Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Illinois medical malpractice attorney Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Schaumburg injury lawyer Palatine personal injury lawyer healthcare claims personal injury attorney car accidents Illinois employment lawyer work unions Schaumburg estate planning attorney hiring employees real estate zoning Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Illinois lawyer TBI CAM estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, subcontractor Illinois wills and trusts Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Palatine construction attorney life insurance lawyer low-ball insurance settlement loopholes bicycle dooring accidents institutional trustee car accident Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer civil litigation Chicago estate planning Rolling Meadows traffic law firm clemency Schaumburg corporate attorney personal injury accidents boating accidents pedestrian-automobile accident Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Crystal Lake law firm Illinois workers compensation attorney Des Plaines pet law attorney natural gas estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers rollover car crashes trucking accident lawyers denied insurance claims Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument trauma after an accident employment contract Illinois trucking safety Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer DUI insurance disputes Inverness civil lawyer Barrington business law firm capital gains tax Schaumburg insurance lawyers Chicago employment attorney Deer Park criminal attorney personal injury lawyer Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney employment law, Illinois employment laws Illinois estate planning Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys personal injury claim insurance claims Palatine civil litigation lawyer owner responsibility wrongful termination LLCs compensatory time Schaumburg personal injury attorney Barrington employment law firm Arlington Heights car crash attorneys slip and fall investment property Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney Barrington workers compensation attorney social media after death revenge porn traffic accidents Palatine trusts lawyer Illinois tax attorney DUI attorney gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Arlington Heights trucking lawyer reckless homicide no contest clauses spinal cord injuries filing a medical malpractice claim insurance dispute comparative negligence construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer surgical mistakes life insurance policy construction contracts Palatine law firm Illinois personal injury lawyers medical malpractice compensation criminal Inverness insurance attorney insurance agents civil rights violation mortgage Arlington Heights criminal lawyer underage DUI job lawyers Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Illinois traffic ticket lawyer operating agreements marijuana crimes attorney elder law Barrington personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer caregiver digital assets condo probate claims process Inverness real estate attorney Schaumburg employment attorney Inverness probate lawyer commercial leases deadly crashes drunk driving statistics drug crimes lawyer Illinois insurance lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Illinois Probate Act of 1975 criminal defense Barrington boating accident attorney Forcible Entry first degree murder Illinois Sales Representative Act Illinois workplace lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers privacy Illinois insurance claim attorney Barrington civil litigation attorney motorcycle accident lawyer license suspension insurance denial appeals Illinois collections attorney Chicago trucking accident attorney Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Self-Directed IRA Accounts Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Des Plaines DUI attorney rest breaks Affordable Care Act insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Deer Park employment law attorney unpaid assessment Fourth of July vacation home pain and suffering Crystal Lake business law attorneys estate plan Palatine corporate attorney Des Plaines claims law firm Inverness injury lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Barrington litigation attorney traffic laws product liability disability benefits Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Crystal Lake car accident lawyer anesthesia errors criminal record Illinois insurance claims lawyers holiday statistics criminal law Deer Park traffic accident attorney Joliet general practice lawyers car crashes commercial real estate insurance adjusters Rolling Meadows Illinois criminal defense attorney Illinois business law atorneys civil litigation attorney Des Plaines tax law firm Illinois head on collisions Thanksgiving personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys insurance claim dispute attorney Deer Park medical malpractice attorney murder defense underinsured motorist back injuries dealing with problem employees creditors insurance negligence Barrington attorney Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer workers compensation benefits employee discrimination Illinois employment law firm Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer pedestrian accidents Illinois estate planning law firm rollover accidents Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Mt Prospect Attorney Des Plaines Des Plaines real estate attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer small business Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer estate planning for college students fiduciary rule pizza emoji Crystal Lake will lawyer employee rights Illinois elder law attorney breach of contract Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute car accident lawyers real estate contract pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality employment law Palatine civil attorney jet ski accidents liability claims independent contractor Illinois probate lawyer Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Palatine Attorney dram shop law IRELA Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Illinois traffic attorney premises liability Des Plaines accident attorney Illinois registered agent Liquor Control Act Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers products liability Arlington Heights insurance attorney denial of life insurance field sobriety test Deer Park personal injury lawyer Fair Labor Standards Act Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Crystal Lake tax lawyer Attorney Ken Apicella appealing an insurance claim Schaumburg car accident attorney jet ski Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Schaumburg elder law lawyer car crash cell phone Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Deer Park accident attorney workers comp Mount Prospect elder law attorney texting while driving loss of consortium IRA benefits sole proprietorship Palatine criminal defense lawyer FSLA BAIID Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Chicago estate planning lawyer Mount Prospect real estate lawyer home inspection lawyer Illinois real estate Illinois employee rights attorney. internet health insurance dispute gift taxes Palatine elder law attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Illinois Human Rights Act taxes hit and run accident irrevocable trust Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer unauthorized overtime Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Palatine punch death Illinois business lawyer Palatine corporate law attorneys texting and driving Barrington employment law attorney Kenilworth estate planning lawyer ObamaCare distracted driving accidents Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys foreclosure Arlington Heights injury attorney Arlington Heights real estate lawyer icy parking lots Chicago attorney Illinois living will Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Illinois home inspection Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Home Remodeling Repair Act DNR in terrorem provision corporate law murder charges real estate attorneys Illinois traffic laws car collision Illinois driving without license digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Inverness DUI lawyer Rolling Meadows Attorney personal injury claims Chicago employment lawyer Barrington estate planning lawyer Arlington Heights lawyer real estate lawyer Long Grove real estate attorney Des Plaines collections attorney Inverness accident lawyer Rolling Meadows employment attorney Schaumburg criminal law attorney Illinois insurance disputes Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Long Grove estate planning Home Sale Contingencies drugs accidental death benefits automated cars power of attorney cell phone tower data Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Barrington employment attorney Illinois employment law power of attorney for healthcare Long Grove estate planning attorneys overtime pay employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Palatine employment attorney insurance denials Illinois employment law attorneys boating DUI murder brain injury Illinois DUI attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney Long Grove real estate lawyer Exclusions Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act breathalyzer test Schaumburg probate attorney Illinois corporate lawyer medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Palatine insurance lawyer Illinois estate planning attorney traffic violations defense car accident lawyer financial advisors Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Inverness elder law lawyer Barrington personal injury attorney Crystal Lake injury attorney traffic deaths golf accidents Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Illinois wills and trusts attorneys living wills life insurance meal breaks workers compensation Illinois construction accident attorney drug crime Illinois car accident attorney marijuana Illinois workers compensation lawyer Chicago lawyer living trust Palatine real estate lawyer Illinois civil litigation lawyer Illinois rollover accident lawyers Des Plaines real estate lawyer estate planning trusts Illinois defective products attorney employment attorney living trust vs will employment lawyer Illinois job attorney startup company Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer boating under the influence Palatine drug lawyer Illinois employment laws medical malpractice claims forming a corporation in Illinois trucking accidents Palatine employment law lawyer Palatine estate planning lawyer dynasty trusts Schaumburg estate attorney modern family estate planning Illinois real estate lawyer fatal car accidents unfunded trust Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer nursing home negligence Barrington medical malpractice lawyers bad faith insurance claims Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Inverness real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Chicago traffic lawyer consent to a search FMLA Illinois trusts attorney Illinois LLC creation traffic crimes Employment Discrimination Law construction accidents Chicago insurance claim attorneys personal injury law firm blended families pedestrian accident problem employees sexual harassment probate claims Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Arlington Heights employment attorney wage theft Illinois insurance dispute lawyers minimum wage Deer Park real estate law firm digital evidence federal crimes Buffalo Grove corporate attorney business litigation senior citizens Palatine employment lawyer caretaker rights South Barrington real estate attorney Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer underfunded trust contracts Illinois insurance attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer severance agreements Deer Park DUI lawyer Illinois traffic accident lawyer fiduciary rule delay digital information Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Barrington estate planning attorney special needs trust income distribution deducation Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer deed transfer Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney distracted driving accident victims controlled substance Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Colin Gilbert Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers agent swimming pools Chicago biking tips traffic tickets crossover accidents Inverness estate planning lawyer Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Palatine traffic lawyer Inverness corporate attorney Schaumburg estate planning lawyer preventable medical errors estate tax Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Transfer on Death Instrument trench injuries Illinois medical malpractice claim Rolling Meadows probate lawyer fault based insurance Detainer Actions installment contracts probate lawyer bike accident cell phone accidents driving employee misclassification slip and fall accidents defective products lawyer uninsured motorist Illinois personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer traumatic brain injuries Des Plaines insurance attorney Retaliatory Discharge right to work Des Plaines injury law firm expungement Legal Info Arlington Heights traffic attorney Des Plaines civil attorney workplace sexual harassment Illinois medical malpractice case traumatic brain injury rent to own real estate contracts Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney insurance dispute attorney Crystal Lake insurance lawyer drunk driving Kenilworth estate planning attorney Illinois pet lawyer Palatine probate lawyer Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney natural gas explosion Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Des Plaines drug lawyer whistleblower protections liens Inverness personal injury attorney speeding estate planning lawyer advance healthcare directive Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association license Illinois red light cameras ken apicella elder abuse Arlington Heights tax lawyer pay when paid contract Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Crystal Lake car accident attorney hands free device Schaumburg civil litigation attorney probate process ACA Chicago will attorney pregnant women eluding a police officer attorney fees DUI defense School Visitation Rights Act Barrington criminal lawyer guardianship attorney living trust benefits Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Illinois employment attorneys drug possession Palatine traffic accidents Chicago corporate attorney real estate attorney landlord Chicago insurance law firm unpaid overtime Colin H. Gilbert BAC car crash injuries Rolling Meadows business lawyer Arlington Heights Attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer suspended license Schaumburg wrongful death attorney federal regulations for LLCs South Barrington real estate lawyer medical marijuana insurance claim dispute BUI employees Illinois attorney DUI penalities traffic violations liability Barrington real estate lawyer wills and trusts PTSD Illinois small business Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Illinois personal injury Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Illinois law drug crimes residential real estate bicycle accidents IRA trust transfer insurance claim delay Illinois personal injury attorney DGAA Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Barrington Traffic Lawyer Illinois traffic attorneys Buffalo Grove law firm involuntary manslaughter Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Illinois bicycle safety Schaumburg real estate lawyer rumble strips Illinois employment law attorney spinal cord injury vacation home fines Barrington criminal defense lawyer personal injury college kids Policy Cancellation Illinois will lawyer landlord tenant law Schaumburg criminal attorney insurance attorney Schaumburg employment law attorneys Crystal Lake employment attorney auto accidents POA Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers trusts wrongful death Arlington Heights TBI attorney Illinois injury lawyer Des Plaines criminal attorney insurance agent negligence GM ignition switches trustee estate planning attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Barrington injury attorney Crystal Lake accident attorney Palatine business attorney sexual images mass shooting Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, defective products Chicago car accident lawyer traffic offenses privacy laws Palatine workers compensation lawyer foreclosed rental property medical research motorcycle accident Crystal Lake pet attorney pet bites Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers child safety Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers condo association Illinois boating accident lawyer Rolling Meadows tax attorney license revocation Class A misdemeanor wills food poisoning insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys denied insurance claim Do Not Resuscitate healthcare Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney