Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.


The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.


Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.

Legally Possessing Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Friday, December 06, 2013

On August 1st, 2013, the Illinois legislature passed The Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, which allows the use of medical marijuana in Illinois. This bill, which goes into effect on January 1st of next year, expands access to marijuana for those with certain medical conditions. However, the law keeps it illegal for recreational purposes, and tries to maintain public safety by carefully regulating who uses the drug and how much is allowed.

Rules on Marijuana Use

The state legislature placed several restrictions on the legality of medical marijuana. The law allows people to obtain marijuana only if they have one of 33 illnesses listed in the Act. However, the law also gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) the authority to add new diseases to the list as they see fit. The Act further limits the use of medical marijuana to people over the age of 18 who do not have a prior felony conviction. The legislature also attempted to control the spread of marijuana by requiring an Illinois ID card or driver’s license, so that people cannot travel to Illinois from other states just to get marijuana. Additionally, the Act forbids the use of marijuana in front of minor children.

How to Obtain Medical Marijuana

The process for acquiring medical marijuana eligibility contains three steps. First, a doctor must diagnose the patient with one of the 33 listed conditions, which include, among other diseases, cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS, MS, and various pain disorders. Once the doctor diagnoses a patient with an eligible disorder, the patient can go to a medical marijuana clinic or other specialist to acquire a doctor’s recommendation for medical marijuana. The patient then takes that recommendation to the IDPH who will issue them an ID card that allows them to purchase medical marijuana.

Once the patient becomes eligible for medical marijuana, they can take their ID card to one of 60 state-regulated dispensaries, and use it to purchase up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana every two weeks. Patients should keep in mind that the state heavily controls the supply of medical marijuana, which means that it may take a few months after the bill goes into effect before the medical marijuana actually becomes available.

Legal Help

If you have questions about the legality of medical marijuana, or have been charged with a crime related to medical marijuana, contact an experienced Chicago drug defense attorney today. We serve many areas in the northwest suburbs including Schaumburg, Barrington, Des Plaines, Deer Park, Buffalo Grove, and more.

Recent Posts


underinsured motorist fiduciary rule holiday statistics traffic crimes Illinois traffic attorney Illinois defective products attorney car accident lawyers sole proprietorship head on collisions healthcare Self-Directed IRA Accounts anesthesia errors Illinois estate planning right to work ken apicella breach of contract digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Crystal Lake accident attorney Crystal Lake traffic attorney denial of insurance claim disability benefits insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Illinois employment law Illinois medical malpractice case power of attorney bicycle dooring accidents Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Inverness personal injury attorney filing a medical malpractice claim Des Plaines criminal attorney Arlington Heights accident attorney Illinois real estate lawyer pedestrian accident workers compensation benefits life insurance claims Illinois traffic attorneys how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer caretaker rights privacy laws deed transfer Arlington Heights employment attorney Home Remodeling Repair Act Deer Park traffic lawyer estate attorney Crystal Lake pet attorney hands free device Long Grove real estate attorney changes to mortgage law Illinois insurance claim attorney Palatine corporate law attorneys insufficient documentation Palatine criminal defense lawyer criminal defense underfunded trust car crash injuries Schaumburg injury lawyer natural gas explosion Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Illinois medical malpractice attorney commercial leasing dog bites insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys boating DUI gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Illinois LLC creation Crystal Lake employment lawyer owner responsibility landlord medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers life insurance lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney construction accidents taxes boating accidents BAIID employment contract Illinois Smoke Detector Act Illinois Trust Code insurance negligence underage DUI Illinois trusts attorney DMV Palatine traffic accidents elder abuse Palatine civil attorney Arlington Heights injury attorney DNR Chicago traffic lawyer Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, IRS Illinois jet ski accident lawyer pay when paid contract suspended license Schaumburg insurance lawyers car collision denial of life insurance car crashes Chicago estate planning lawyer license suspension Long Grove estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Arlington Heights traffic attorney wrongful death Buffalo Grove law firm Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act employment lawyer drunk driving Illinois registered agent eluding a police officer Buffalo Grove probate lawyer consent to a search problem employees traffic offenses Illinois probate lawyer jet ski Illinois speeding lawyer golf accidents landlord tenant law Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer Chicago employment attorney South Barrington real estate attorney Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys blended families Schaumburg criminal attorney Illinois workplace discrimination attorney motorcycle accident icy parking lots drug possession pizza emoji Des Plaines injury law firm Palatine business attorney Illinois attorney Deer Park DUI lawyer breathalyzer test Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney expungement Retaliatory Discharge probate process senior citizens accidental death benefits Illinois collections attorney Des Plaines drug lawyer wills and trusts unpaid assessment Long Grove estate planning Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Chicago insurance claim attorneys tax attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers pet law vacation home digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Schaumburg estate planning attorney CAM severance agreements auto accidents Crystal Lake law firm Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney power of attorney for healthcare estate planning lawyer traffic laws Illinois Human Rights Act minimum wage trauma after an accident Illinois employment law attorneys Illinois personal injury attorney denied insurance claim Des Plaines civil attorney deadly crashes Schaumburg personal injury attorney special needs trust Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument real estate Des Plaines real estate attorney sexual harassment whistleblower protections Barrington workers compensation attorney estate tax Arlington Heights real estate lawyer medical malpractice claims Illinois home inspection Palatine life insurance lawyer liens irrevocable trust PTSD workplace sexual harassment IRA benefits Long Grove real estate lawyer swimming pools TBI top life insurance claim denials Palatine injury attorney Illinois red light cameras rent to own real estate contracts Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Crystal Lake injury attorney real estate attorney Colin H. Gilbert nursing home negligence Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute overtime violations BAC Schaumburg criminal law attorney Barrington real estate lawyer Schaumburg car accident attorney Deer Park personal injury lawyer Palatine employment attorney Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer insurance dispute attorney comparative negligence Kenilworth estate planning attorney fatal car accidents Illinois corporate lawyer trucking accident lawyers Home Sale Contingencies Palatine drug lawyer Illinois DUI attorney estate planning attorney liability Des Plaines insurance attorney condo independent contractor Rolling Meadows traffic attorney probate lawyer distracted driving accident victims car crash Arlington Heights personal injury attorney crossover accidents POA wrongful termination business litigation dealing with problem employees Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys employee misclassification Transfer on Death Instrument Arlington Heights insurance attorney Palatine workers compensation lawyer small business Fair Labor Standards Act privacy Palatine personal injury lawyer sexual images Illinois insurance lawyer Schaumburg Illinois pet lawyer overtime pay insurance agent negligence Barrington injury attorney criminal law Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney Illinois workers compensation attorney Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer paid sick leave probate claims process spinal cord injury car accident lawyer Arlington Heights TBI attorney premises liability Des Plaines real estate lawyer Super Mario Illinois Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Arlington Heights lawyer mortgage Illinois boating accident lawyer income distribution deducation probate Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer spinal cord injuries Illinois elder law attorney contracts insurance claim delay Schaumburg corporate attorney commercial leases Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer insurance claims traffic deaths Illinois traffic accident lawyer Palatine law firm Arlington Heights trucking lawyer jet ski accidents digital information job lawyers Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Chicago will attorney life insurance policy Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Barrington personal injury lawyer Colin Gilbert personal injury attorney insurance claim denials unauthorized overtime traffic violations Schaumburg real estate lawyer Buffalo Grove real estate attorney employees Crystal Lake tax lawyer denied insurance claims Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Illinois traffic laws comp time real estate leasing low-ball insurance settlement Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Kenilworth estate planning attorneys employment law elder law Forcible Entry no contest clauses Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Schaumburg elder law lawyer Crystal Lake employment attorney creditors Crystal Lake car accident lawyer medical malpractice compensation Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Affordable Care Act Inverness real estate lawyer Whistleblower Claims advance healthcare directive texting and driving Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Illinois estate planning attorney bicycle accidents Illinois employment attorneys FMLA real estate attorneys marijuana crimes attorney Illinois personal injury lawyer Palatine corporate attorney Palatine traffic lawyer drug crimes hiring employees Rolling Meadows probate lawyer bad faith insurance claims liability claims Barrington Traffic Lawyer workers compensation pedestrian-automobile accident IRA trust transfer slip and fall surgical mistakes forming a corporation in Illinois Exclusions Inverness injury lawyer Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Fourth of July Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney compensatory time Illinois workers compensation lawyer back injuries traumatic brain injury Palatine employment law lawyer mass shooting Schaumburg Attorney living trust insurance attorney boating under the influence traffic tickets rest breaks trusts Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Illinois employment law firm Barrington employment law firm texting while driving Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Attorney Ken Apicella Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers loss of consortium trench injuries real estate lawyer license startup company real estate contract Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney probate claims pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality marijuana employee discrimination most common reasons for life insurance claim denials employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys Liquor Control Act LLCs pedestrian accidents fiduciary rule delay Barrington attorney Illinois workplace lawyer DUI defense Illinois insurance attorney Family Medical Leave Act DUI insurance claim dispute attorney Deer Park workers compensation lawyer appealing an insurance claim Illinois business law atorneys personal injury claim Schaumburg employment attorney Palatine real estate lawyer lapse in policy Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Illinois tax attorney Illinois lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney Palatine punch death manufacturing meal breaks foreclosure Des Plaines accident attorney insurance dispute Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Barrington criminal defense lawyer first degree murder life insurance insurance agents cell phone tower data Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Barrington medical malpractice lawyers residential real estate loopholes homestead rights rumble strips products liability South Barrington real estate lawyer wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Barrington boating accident attorney employee rights Deer Park real estate law firm distracted driving accidents bike accident dynasty trusts Joliet general practice lawyers trucking accidents Schaumburg employment law attorneys Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Rolling Meadows criminal attorney revenge porn Palatine Attorney life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm beneficiary complications Inverness real estate attorney Illinois trucking safety Barrington employment attorney Arlington Heights Attorney internet insurance adjusters insurance claim Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney wage theft investment property living trust vs will Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney Illinois job attorney traffic violations defense BUI IRELA Inverness elder law lawyer reckless homicide insurance disputes traumatic brain injuries Des Plaines personal injury attorney murder School Visitation Rights Act wills Illinois living will Do Not Resuscitate pain and suffering murder defense digital assets Rolling Meadows tax attorney foreclosed rental property DUI attorney Illinois employee rights attorney. Illinois employment lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney Inverness corporate attorney Illinois employment laws defective products lawyer capital gains tax condo association cause-of-death exclusions Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers license reinstatement Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Barrington criminal lawyer Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg probate attorney Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Barrington employment law attorney Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer truck collisions material misrepresentation Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer ObamaCare Inverness DUI lawyer Crystal Lake car accident attorney Illinois mortgages controlled substance Des Plaines collections attorney Barrington litigation attorney college kids work unions Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Illinois civil litigation lawyer car accident Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers slip and fall accidents fault based insurance Illinois law employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, employment law, Illinois employment laws personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer guardianship attorney criminal Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Chicago insurance law firm Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Barrington business law firm driving Chicago estate planning Illinois personal injury Illinois wills and trusts attorneys clemency workers comp Deer Park accident attorney murder charges Inverness insurance attorney Landlord Tenant Ordinance cell phone Barrington life insurance lawyer personal injury Des Plaines claims law firm Illinois criminal defense attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Mount Prospect elder law attorney Illinois insurance claims lawyers Schaumburg estate attorney construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Chicago life insurance attorney insurance denials operating agreements Illinois Sales Representative Act civil litigation subcontractor Barrington estate planning attorney insurance claim dispute Illinois injury lawyer Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Des Plaines Inverness estate planning lawyer Schaumburg traffic lawyer Des Plaines DUI attorney car accidents Rolling Meadows business lawyer caregiver home inspection lawyer Illinois estate planning law firm gift taxes FSLA Barrington drug crime attorney Illinois car accident attorney medical marijuana uninsured motorist commercial real estate Crystal Lake will lawyer drugs child safety pregnant women drug crime Illinois will lawyer probate fees personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Illinois wrongful termination lawyer estate planning for college students healthcare claims Rolling Meadows employment attorney medication errors Palatine insurance lawyer Kenilworth estate planning lawyer dram shop law Chicago biking tips civil rights violation Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer health insurance dispute federal regulations for LLCs pet bites Deer Park employment law attorney brain injury Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Illinois real estate Illinois personal injury lawyers Palatine probate lawyer drunk driving statistics Palatine civil litigation lawyer coronavirus Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer real estate zoning DGAA Schaumburg wrongful death attorney defective products preventable medical errors Des Plaines pet law attorney automated cars Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Jay Andrew Des Plaines personal injury lawyer employment attorney Rolling Meadows real estate attorney estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers estate planning trusts Crystal Lake employment law attorney Crystal Lake business law attorneys insurance denial appeals Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Class A misdemeanor Illinois insurance disputes unpaid overtime construction contracts Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Chicago corporate attorney traffic accidents Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers civil litigation attorney Des Plaines tax law firm estate plan GM ignition switches Employment Discrimination Law personal injury claims Palatine trusts lawyer living wills product liability Long Grove estate planning attorneys Rolling Meadows employment law attorney federal crimes Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer vacation home fines personal injury law firm institutional trustee Mt Prospect Attorney Illinois employment law attorney motorcycle accident lawyer llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association digital evidence new real estate form Inverness probate lawyer Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Schaumburg life insurance attorney Arlington Heights employment law attorneys social media after death Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Illinois traffic ticket lawyer in terrorem provision ACA modern family estate planning Illinois driving without license medical research Detainer Actions Chicago car accident lawyer medical malpractice Palatine estate planning lawyer Inverness accident lawyer Inverness traffic law firm rollover car crashes trust payments Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer rollover accidents Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Illinois medical malpractice claim Palatine elder law attorney hit and run accident living trust benefits Inverness civil lawyer Illinois pedestrian accident attorney agent trustee Rolling Meadows Arlington Heights tax lawyer real estate closing preventing accidents Illinois wills and trusts personal injury accidents Legal Info Illinois bicycle safety estate planning Barrington civil litigation attorney Palatine construction attorney financial advisors drug crimes lawyer Chicago lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney food poisoning Illinois rollover accident lawyers Thanksgiving insurance claim denial Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer attorney fees Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney cell phone accidents Rolling Meadows Attorney Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Policy Cancellation Chicago attorney Barrington personal injury attorney involuntary manslaughter criminal record unfunded trust DUI penalities Illinois small business license revocation installment contracts natural gas speeding Illinois business lawyer field sobriety test Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Deer Park traffic accident attorney Chicago employment lawyer Arlington Heights car accident lawyer corporate law Barrington estate planning lawyer blood alcohol content Palatine employment lawyer