Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.


The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.


Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.

Legally Possessing Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Friday, December 06, 2013

On August 1st, 2013, the Illinois legislature passed The Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, which allows the use of medical marijuana in Illinois. This bill, which goes into effect on January 1st of next year, expands access to marijuana for those with certain medical conditions. However, the law keeps it illegal for recreational purposes, and tries to maintain public safety by carefully regulating who uses the drug and how much is allowed.

Rules on Marijuana Use

The state legislature placed several restrictions on the legality of medical marijuana. The law allows people to obtain marijuana only if they have one of 33 illnesses listed in the Act. However, the law also gives the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) the authority to add new diseases to the list as they see fit. The Act further limits the use of medical marijuana to people over the age of 18 who do not have a prior felony conviction. The legislature also attempted to control the spread of marijuana by requiring an Illinois ID card or driver’s license, so that people cannot travel to Illinois from other states just to get marijuana. Additionally, the Act forbids the use of marijuana in front of minor children.

How to Obtain Medical Marijuana

The process for acquiring medical marijuana eligibility contains three steps. First, a doctor must diagnose the patient with one of the 33 listed conditions, which include, among other diseases, cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS, MS, and various pain disorders. Once the doctor diagnoses a patient with an eligible disorder, the patient can go to a medical marijuana clinic or other specialist to acquire a doctor’s recommendation for medical marijuana. The patient then takes that recommendation to the IDPH who will issue them an ID card that allows them to purchase medical marijuana.

Once the patient becomes eligible for medical marijuana, they can take their ID card to one of 60 state-regulated dispensaries, and use it to purchase up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana every two weeks. Patients should keep in mind that the state heavily controls the supply of medical marijuana, which means that it may take a few months after the bill goes into effect before the medical marijuana actually becomes available.

Legal Help

If you have questions about the legality of medical marijuana, or have been charged with a crime related to medical marijuana, contact an experienced Chicago drug defense attorney today. We serve many areas in the northwest suburbs including Schaumburg, Barrington, Des Plaines, Deer Park, Buffalo Grove, and more.

Recent Posts


internet Crystal Lake accident attorney trustee insurance adjusters golf accidents Illinois small business caretaker rights Schaumburg estate attorney Illinois tax attorney installment contracts DUI Chicago attorney personal injury claim hands free device Forcible Entry real estate attorneys bad faith insurance claims slip and fall accidents pet law social media after death financial advisors insurance claim delay real estate contract Des Plaines insurance attorney Schaumburg Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Rolling Meadows criminal attorney fiduciary rule expungement Illinois criminal defense attorney premises liability drug crime Illinois Probate Act of 1975 estate attorney Chicago estate planning digital assets Riverwoods estate planning lawyer insurance claim denial Palatine law firm driving Buffalo Grove employment lawyer investment property Arlington Heights Attorney gift taxes real estate closing Illinois traffic laws Policy Cancellation Des Plaines real estate lawyer living wills liability Des Plaines injury law firm college kids Chicago employment lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer wills and trusts LLCs ACA employment law, Illinois employment laws ken apicella condo association Long Grove estate planning attorneys PTSD compensatory time Barrington employment law firm wrongful termination Arlington Heights accident attorney involuntary manslaughter Illinois workplace lawyer employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Illinois employment lawyer Rolling Meadows business lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer homestead rights Transfer on Death Instrument Illinois Sales Representative Act employee rights bicycle accidents Palatine employment law lawyer Crystal Lake injury attorney Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Colin H. Gilbert Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Illinois driving without license Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Rolling Meadows pedestrian accidents Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Illinois business lawyer dog bites Crystal Lake employment lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney employment attorney Schaumburg probate attorney Illinois elder law attorney trench injuries Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Palatine real estate lawyer mortgage Affordable Care Act Illinois estate planning ObamaCare Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys IRELA anesthesia errors criminal law pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality contracts Illinois employment laws agent Chicago insurance claim attorneys manufacturing DUI defense Illinois LLC creation health insurance dispute personal injury overtime pay Palatine Attorney personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys revenge porn Illinois civil litigation lawyer unpaid overtime surgical mistakes denied insurance claims Illinois employment law firm consent to a search Deer Park workers compensation lawyer medical research trucking accident lawyers Illinois Human Rights Act swimming pools license reinstatement Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Illinois personal injury car crashes Self-Directed IRA Accounts Illinois red light cameras Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer traffic offenses civil litigation automated cars Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers BAC job lawyers construction contracts Illinois trusts attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Illinois personal injury attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney unauthorized overtime Inverness elder law lawyer distracted driving accidents right to work Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Barrington attorney Palatine business attorney Arlington Heights car accident lawyer real estate leasing car collision jet ski employee discrimination deadly crashes Crystal Lake employment law attorney murder real estate zoning personal injury attorney insurance claim dispute attorney Illinois jet ski accident lawyer employment law pedestrian accident insurance attorney Illinois personal injury lawyers Schaumburg insurance lawyers elder abuse personal injury accidents employment lawyer Palatine workers compensation lawyer Crystal Lake business law attorneys Family Medical Leave Act advance healthcare directive Illinois business law atorneys Des Plaines accident attorney Schaumburg employment law attorneys spinal cord injury personal injury claims wage theft elder law Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, DNR Barrington civil litigation attorney Des Plaines tax law firm income distribution deducation medical marijuana Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Barrington drug crime attorney Chicago lawyer tax attorney Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Illinois construction accident attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Des Plaines personal injury lawyer holiday statistics Rolling Meadows employment attorney Des Plaines claims law firm accidental death benefits eluding a police officer Palatine criminal defense lawyer insurance claim denials commercial leasing estate planning attorney vacation home trust payments Exclusions boating under the influence living trust benefits paid sick leave Schaumburg wrongful death attorney insurance claims Palatine trusts lawyer Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Barrington injury attorney residential real estate Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer Illinois Smoke Detector Act Retaliatory Discharge employee misclassification Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Whistleblower Claims insurance negligence Palatine civil litigation lawyer breach of contract Mount Prospect elder law attorney Schaumburg employment attorney preventing accidents fatal car accidents foreclosure natural gas explosion Illinois job attorney Illinois car accident attorney Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Palatine corporate attorney fiduciary rule delay Schaumburg criminal law attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Home Remodeling Repair Act operating agreements pain and suffering defective products lawyer speeding rumble strips Deer Park personal injury lawyer condo Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Inverness DUI lawyer Palatine drug lawyer marijuana crimes attorney independent contractor products liability crossover accidents texting and driving texting while driving DUI penalities Illinois traffic attorney spinal cord injuries estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Rolling Meadows traffic law firm license suspension Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer car crash injuries Barrington real estate lawyer civil rights violation Illinois workers compensation lawyer Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Barrington litigation attorney deed transfer personal injury lawyer Barrington criminal defense lawyer traumatic brain injury construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Arlington Heights insurance attorney Illinois insurance lawyer dynasty trusts civil litigation attorney Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Barrington boating accident attorney Barrington estate planning attorney drug possession wills estate planning severance agreements Illinois Trust Code Illinois insurance claim attorney forming a corporation in Illinois liens digital evidence license revocation medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Deer Park traffic accident attorney Arlington Heights car crash attorneys unfunded trust rent to own real estate contracts Illinois traffic accident lawyer healthcare controlled substance criminal record Illinois medical malpractice claim Class A misdemeanor Rolling Meadows probate lawyer cell phone tower data Kenilworth estate planning attorneys fault based insurance Palatine employment attorney rollover car crashes Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer medical malpractice compensation appealing an insurance claim child safety Des Plaines DUI attorney truck collisions Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer institutional trustee Home Sale Contingencies creditors power of attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Palatine traffic lawyer Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Illinois will lawyer Illinois corporate lawyer Chicago car accident lawyer Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute probate fees Illinois injury lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer product liability Long Grove estate planning small business Illinois real estate lawyer Kenilworth estate planning lawyer marijuana loopholes Detainer Actions Deer Park real estate law firm Rolling Meadows Attorney pet bites work unions Barrington business law firm Palatine insurance lawyer car accident Crystal Lake pet attorney trauma after an accident special needs trust personal injury law firm Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Illinois employment law attorney DGAA Arlington Heights estate planning attorney insurance dispute attorney dram shop law Mt Prospect Attorney Barrington criminal lawyer estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, cell phone accidents Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney uninsured motorist Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer construction accidents workplace sexual harassment brain injury Illinois traffic attorneys Illinois employment attorneys Schaumburg criminal attorney Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys distracted driving accident victims Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer disability benefits Do Not Resuscitate Landlord Tenant Ordinance Crystal Lake employment attorney sexual harassment Illinois probate lawyer Illinois home inspection owner responsibility Buffalo Grove injury lawyer traffic violations defense Super Mario Palatine personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Illinois wrongful termination lawyer life insurance claims Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act pizza emoji reckless homicide Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm blood alcohol content estate tax Crystal Lake will lawyer dealing with problem employees landlord tenant law Arlington Heights lawyer traumatic brain injuries Palatine civil attorney taxes Barrington employment attorney Deer Park traffic lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers South Barrington real estate lawyer estate planning trusts subcontractor Illinois registered agent liability claims Illinois personal injury lawyer gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Colin Gilbert car accident lawyers startup company wrongful death Buffalo Grove real estate attorney clemency Schaumburg elder law lawyer Arlington Heights employment attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Schaumburg estate planning attorney Chicago biking tips Deer Park medical malpractice attorney llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association employment contract Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Rolling Meadows real estate attorney living trust pregnant women license nursing home negligence Deer Park DUI lawyer attorney fees traffic violations Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney blended families traffic laws Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer sole proprietorship privacy Inverness real estate lawyer Palatine estate planning lawyer insurance denial appeals IRS irrevocable trust IRA trust transfer Illinois real estate real estate lawyer Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Illinois insurance attorney Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act rollover accidents Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Attorney Ken Apicella insurance denials pay when paid contract Illinois medical malpractice attorney Illinois attorney Illinois employment law attorneys natural gas Schaumburg car accident attorney home inspection lawyer back injuries capital gains tax healthcare claims hit and run accident probate Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer medication errors Barrington personal injury attorney Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission meal breaks CAM insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Arlington Heights injury attorney Fair Labor Standards Act Palatine elder law attorney drunk driving School Visitation Rights Act business litigation comp time problem employees employees Barrington personal injury lawyer commercial leases Illinois medical malpractice case Schaumburg drug defense lawyer estate planning lawyer Des Plaines drug lawyer modern family estate planning Palatine probate lawyer probate lawyer Illinois medical malpractice lawyers life insurance policy icy parking lots Illinois pet lawyer Inverness real estate attorney field sobriety test Illinois estate planning attorney Arlington Heights tax lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers car accident lawyer denied insurance claim federal regulations for LLCs Illinois wills and trusts rest breaks Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer bicycle dooring accidents Chicago employment attorney filing a medical malpractice claim preventable medical errors Chicago traffic lawyer Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Deer Park accident attorney DUI attorney Des Plaines civil attorney caregiver Chicago insurance law firm drug crimes Employment Discrimination Law Inverness corporate attorney Long Grove real estate attorney Des Plaines real estate attorney criminal life insurance Thanksgiving Inverness estate planning lawyer Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers IRA benefits power of attorney for healthcare life insurance lawyer food poisoning Palatine injury attorney Crystal Lake traffic attorney hiring employees Arlington Heights TBI attorney Long Grove real estate lawyer Deer Park employment law attorney breathalyzer test boating accidents Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Illinois boating accident lawyer Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyers boating DUI Chicago estate planning lawyer trusts new real estate form motorcycle accident first degree murder Barrington workers compensation attorney Palatine traffic accidents BUI traffic tickets Schaumburg personal injury attorney medical malpractice claims insurance dispute Illinois DUI attorney Joliet general practice lawyers Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument probate claims insurance disputes workers comp Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer FSLA drug crimes lawyer insurance agent negligence privacy laws insurance agents underfunded trust Illinois workers compensation attorney employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, senior citizens head on collisions Palatine punch death insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys underage DUI Rolling Meadows tax attorney landlord BAIID Inverness probate lawyer unpaid assessment Liquor Control Act Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents FMLA whistleblower protections commercial real estate Jay Andrew sexual images real estate attorney Illinois employee rights attorney. comparative negligence Mount Prospect real estate lawyer jet ski accidents Chicago corporate attorney drugs Illinois insurance disputes POA Barrington Traffic Lawyer low-ball insurance settlement denial of life insurance changes to mortgage law Crystal Lake car accident attorney TBI Long Grove estate planning attorney digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, digital information Arlington Heights traffic attorney probate claims process corporate law Deer Park criminal attorney Arlington Heights criminal lawyer probate process Inverness insurance attorney GM ignition switches Des Plaines pet law attorney Illinois lawyer car accidents South Barrington real estate attorney insurance claim Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers Schaumburg Attorney Fourth of July Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers living trust vs will Inverness traffic law firm Crystal Lake law firm traffic accidents defective products Illinois trucking safety foreclosed rental property Illinois law Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer pedestrian-automobile accident traffic crimes Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer minimum wage trucking accidents DMV workers compensation benefits mass shooting Palatine corporate law attorneys no contest clauses Inverness accident lawyer drunk driving statistics car crash Palatine construction attorney Illinois insurance claims lawyers Illinois speeding lawyer Schaumburg real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Legal Info Crystal Lake tax lawyer overtime violations Inverness injury lawyer Buffalo Grove law firm real estate Des Plaines collections attorney Chicago will attorney in terrorem provision Illinois defective products attorney Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Buffalo Grove probate lawyer federal crimes Inverness personal injury attorney slip and fall murder defense suspended license Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney loss of consortium underinsured motorist bike accident Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Kenilworth estate planning attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Illinois mortgages murder charges Des Plaines cell phone medical malpractice vacation home fines Illinois collections attorney workers compensation criminal defense Illinois living will Illinois bicycle safety Barrington employment law attorney estate plan motorcycle accident lawyer Barrington estate planning lawyer traffic deaths Des Plaines criminal attorney Illinois estate planning law firm Illinois rollover accident lawyers Illinois Illinois employment law insurance claim dispute estate planning for college students Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Palatine employment lawyer guardianship attorney Inverness civil lawyer auto accidents