DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.


Recent Posts


Tags

living wills denial of life insurance college kids medical marijuana Employment Discrimination Law Illinois car accident attorney employee misclassification probate fees Attorney Ken Apicella involuntary manslaughter expungement Illinois rollover accident lawyers pet law DUI attorney Schaumburg Attorney comp time murder Chicago employment lawyer Rolling Meadows tax attorney construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer real estate leasing wrongful death Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney consent to a search Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Buffalo Grove traffic attorney federal crimes drug crimes lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorney Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers marijuana Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer hands free device defective products Barrington attorney Deer Park criminal attorney Arlington Heights injury attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer fault based insurance drunk driving statistics Crystal Lake injury attorney Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Illinois insurance claims lawyers Des Plaines DUI attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer living trust vs will workers comp DNR TBI traffic deaths Crystal Lake pet attorney appealing an insurance claim estate attorney Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer rent to own real estate contracts Illinois personal injury Mt Prospect Attorney rest breaks irrevocable trust traffic violations defense Palatine drug lawyer bad faith insurance claims underfunded trust employee discrimination estate planning attorney Crystal Lake accident attorney Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Des Plaines pet law attorney Illinois employment lawyer Deer Park personal injury lawyer dynasty trusts personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Illinois living will Rolling Meadows traffic attorney special needs trust tax attorney personal injury unfunded trust Chicago biking tips insurance agents DUI insurance disputes drugs real estate attorney Palatine construction attorney Arlington Heights employment attorney license suspension Illinois Sales Representative Act pizza emoji Long Grove estate planning attorneys top life insurance claim denials Illinois small business Rolling Meadows Attorney most common reasons for life insurance claim denials preventable medical errors premises liability Chicago insurance claim attorneys Des Plaines injury law firm Barrington life insurance lawyer Illinois civil litigation lawyer natural gas explosion license reinstatement motorcycle accident lawyer compensatory time living trust contracts real estate closing Illinois traffic laws changes to mortgage law fiduciary rule delay Chicago estate planning wills and trusts trust payments denied insurance claims Palatine corporate attorney trucking accidents overtime violations Crystal Lake insurance lawyer spinal cord injury Illinois employment law attorneys slip and fall accidents Schaumburg employment attorney liens Barrington employment law firm small business Illinois estate planning attorney trauma after an accident Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers forming a corporation in Illinois Schaumburg real estate lawyer Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Schaumburg probate attorney Barrington business law firm golf accidents Illinois traffic attorneys Illinois insurance attorney Barrington litigation attorney murder charges Buffalo Grove injury lawyer bicycle accidents texting while driving Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Colin Gilbert home inspection lawyer Chicago will attorney Chicago insurance law firm breathalyzer test Inverness insurance attorney traffic accidents mortgage Palatine real estate lawyer homestead rights Barrington real estate lawyer Chicago traffic lawyer taxes Chicago corporate attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Family Medical Leave Act CAM bike accident estate tax IRA trust transfer business litigation Long Grove estate planning Illinois probate lawyer fatal car accidents condo association Schaumburg insurance lawyers Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Arlington Heights Attorney Schaumburg wrongful death attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers anesthesia errors Joliet general practice lawyers life insurance policy motorcycle accident BAIID coronavirus pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality criminal law real estate zoning ACA car accident lawyer Des Plaines insurance attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Illinois collections attorney traffic tickets Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Schaumburg injury lawyer wage theft Des Plaines personal injury attorney Illinois trucking safety drunk driving Illinois boating accident lawyer traffic offenses Illinois business lawyer South Barrington real estate lawyer brain injury Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute blended families Illinois will lawyer uninsured motorist employees Exclusions Deer Park traffic accident attorney income distribution deducation workers compensation Crystal Lake employment lawyer Deer Park real estate law firm real estate lawyer Des Plaines civil attorney criminal Barrington personal injury attorney insurance attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Arlington Heights lawyer Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Landlord Tenant Ordinance work unions Palatine civil litigation lawyer Deer Park employment law attorney ObamaCare Barrington estate planning lawyer spinal cord injuries employment attorney Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys insurance claims field sobriety test Illinois corporate lawyer Palatine estate planning lawyer creditors lapse in policy Crystal Lake law firm civil litigation dealing with problem employees Illinois criminal defense attorney Arlington Heights estate planning attorney insurance adjusters Illinois real estate lawyer probate process digital evidence Inverness DUI lawyer Barrington civil litigation attorney caretaker rights Crystal Lake business law attorneys Des Plaines claims law firm Rolling Meadows criminal attorney speeding health insurance dispute Illinois employment law Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Arlington Heights insurance attorney Illinois home inspection Palatine punch death life insurance claims Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Inverness corporate attorney Illinois personal injury attorney boating under the influence Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Chicago life insurance attorney Deer Park DUI lawyer Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Illinois estate planning law firm probate employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney medication errors Illinois job attorney Crystal Lake traffic attorney BUI estate plan loss of consortium Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer denied insurance claim personal injury law firm Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Illinois Smoke Detector Act Inverness elder law lawyer Deer Park medical malpractice attorney jet ski Illinois Trust Code corporate law Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Illinois Probate Act of 1975 vacation home Retaliatory Discharge meal breaks unpaid assessment Palatine injury attorney insurance claim delay car accidents Illinois pet lawyer Chicago car accident lawyer Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Barrington criminal defense lawyer minimum wage Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney car crash injuries blood alcohol content BAC Rolling Meadows business lawyer Crystal Lake will lawyer Crystal Lake employment law attorney healthcare Des Plaines drug lawyer pregnant women traffic crimes Illinois injury lawyer Palatine personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows real estate attorney condo Illinois workers compensation attorney criminal defense Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer internet employment law, Illinois employment laws GM ignition switches medical malpractice medical malpractice claims sexual harassment Illinois tax attorney Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer probate claims medical malpractice compensation dram shop law pet bites Illinois Human Rights Act boating DUI Arlington Heights criminal lawyer digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, startup company real estate attorneys Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney institutional trustee Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Home Sale Contingencies Illinois insurance lawyer controlled substance pain and suffering installment contracts Illinois mortgages Deer Park accident attorney truck collisions product liability investment property Illinois personal injury lawyer icy parking lots Crystal Lake traffic lawyer civil rights violation Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Inverness traffic law firm caregiver Policy Cancellation Rolling Meadows insurance attorney defective products lawyer Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Illinois construction accident attorney Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer rollover accidents Crystal Lake tax lawyer DUI defense elder law Arlington Heights traffic attorney privacy laws Illinois insurance claim attorney Fair Labor Standards Act drug possession Arlington Heights employment law attorneys estate planning for college students Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys cause-of-death exclusions distracted driving accident victims Palatine traffic lawyer Long Grove real estate lawyer Chicago estate planning lawyer trucking accident lawyers Chicago trucking accident attorney DGAA Illinois defective products attorney llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Illinois workers compensation lawyer Jay Andrew Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers living trust benefits Illinois employment laws Illinois insurance disputes Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Arlington Heights tax lawyer Illinois medical malpractice attorney Barrington drug crime attorney Palatine elder law attorney Barrington criminal lawyer Illinois law Inverness injury lawyer criminal record first degree murder pay when paid contract Do Not Resuscitate Class A misdemeanor digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Illinois employment law attorney Palatine Attorney Des Plaines tax law firm Palatine law firm products liability School Visitation Rights Act Illinois bicycle safety suspended license Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Schaumburg car accident attorney Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Schaumburg criminal attorney Schaumburg FMLA Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer low-ball insurance settlement DUI penalities Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Palatine employment law lawyer Des Plaines accident attorney estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Inverness accident lawyer advance healthcare directive deed transfer Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Kenilworth estate planning attorneys wills car crashes accidental death benefits eluding a police officer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Palatine workers compensation lawyer Palatine probate lawyer Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Forcible Entry job lawyers revenge porn power of attorney for healthcare estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Des Plaines criminal attorney preventing accidents auto accidents Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers personal injury lawyer federal regulations for LLCs Schaumburg estate planning lawyer landlord tenant law Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney Inverness civil lawyer Rolling Meadows employment attorney digital assets deadly crashes foreclosure modern family estate planning Rolling Meadows accident lawyer hiring employees gift taxes insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Illinois red light cameras rollover car crashes construction accidents Crystal Lake employment attorney commercial leasing estate planning lawyer Inverness estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows employment law attorney digital information fiduciary rule Des Plaines real estate lawyer Illinois elder law attorney elder abuse Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Schaumburg personal injury attorney Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act insurance denials Illinois insurance dispute lawyers no contest clauses Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Des Plaines new real estate form real estate Crystal Lake car accident attorney driving filing a medical malpractice claim car collision underage DUI employment lawyer Arlington Heights car accident lawyer manufacturing Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Barrington boating accident attorney Palatine business attorney Illinois trusts attorney automated cars Illinois real estate Illinois driving without license senior citizens crossover accidents Schaumburg personal injury lawyers trustee South Barrington real estate attorney clemency Barrington injury attorney Chicago employment attorney commercial leases traffic laws estate planning trusts Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer bicycle dooring accidents problem employees cell phone Barrington personal injury lawyer Barrington estate planning attorney owner responsibility Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Legal Info Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act probate claims process surgical mistakes personal injury accidents Illinois registered agent Thanksgiving Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Home Remodeling Repair Act Schaumburg criminal law attorney POA Illinois wills and trusts Illinois DUI attorney PTSD denial of insurance claim how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims foreclosed rental property attorney fees Barrington Traffic Lawyer insurance dispute attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer residential real estate Chicago lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers Palatine life insurance lawyer landlord Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, agent car accident Palatine employment attorney insurance dispute paid sick leave social media after death personal injury claim Deer Park traffic lawyer liability claims texting and driving pedestrian accidents real estate contract Illinois medical malpractice claim Schaumburg life insurance attorney Fourth of July cell phone accidents Illinois estate planning unauthorized overtime right to work DMV financial advisors Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney marijuana crimes attorney slip and fall license Inverness personal injury attorney Long Grove estate planning attorney insurance agent negligence Palatine criminal defense lawyer pedestrian-automobile accident Buffalo Grove probate lawyer healthcare claims license revocation Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys insurance claim dispute Schaumburg estate attorney Illinois LLC creation Buffalo Grove law firm Whistleblower Claims trench injuries Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer loopholes Crystal Lake personal injury attorney life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim Illinois employee rights attorney. employment law Arlington Heights accident attorney civil litigation attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyers holiday statistics Chicago attorney disability benefits Illinois lawyer Illinois pedestrian accident attorney overtime pay head on collisions Illinois employment law firm Schaumburg elder law lawyer Transfer on Death Instrument Schaumburg employment law attorneys Illinois business law atorneys Barrington medical malpractice lawyers cell phone tower data IRA benefits Detainer Actions food poisoning hit and run accident comparative negligence Long Grove real estate attorney Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Palatine corporate law attorneys Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer back injuries Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Inverness probate lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Schaumburg civil litigation attorney traumatic brain injuries car accident lawyers Palatine employment lawyer privacy Schaumburg personal injury lawyer operating agreements beneficiary complications Inverness real estate lawyer jet ski accidents unpaid overtime insurance claim denials construction contracts ken apicella drug crimes child safety liability breach of contract medical research Illinois attorney Illinois personal injury attorney Self-Directed IRA Accounts severance agreements workers compensation benefits Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer personal injury claims Palatine trusts lawyer Barrington employment attorney Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Illinois traffic attorney distracted driving accidents IRS Illinois speeding lawyer Barrington employment law attorney in terrorem provision material misrepresentation Schaumburg estate planning attorney whistleblower protections workplace sexual harassment drug crime Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, vacation home fines insurance claim Liquor Control Act boating accidents IRELA Affordable Care Act Illinois traffic ticket lawyer sexual images wrongful termination Des Plaines collections attorney probate lawyer insufficient documentation Rolling Meadows car crash murder defense underinsured motorist rumble strips Illinois workplace lawyer employee rights reckless homicide employment contract Inverness real estate attorney pedestrian accident Colin H. Gilbert Barrington workers compensation attorney Palatine insurance lawyer Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney guardianship attorney Super Mario Palatine traffic accidents medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers dog bites insurance denial appeals mass shooting nursing home negligence swimming pools Illinois traffic accident lawyer commercial real estate Arlington Heights TBI attorney wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Mount Prospect elder law attorney insurance claim dispute attorney natural gas estate planning subcontractor sole proprietorship Des Plaines real estate attorney independent contractor Palatine civil attorney life insurance capital gains tax Illinois medical malpractice case traffic violations life insurance lawyer insurance claim denial traumatic brain injury Illinois employment attorneys insurance negligence FSLA power of attorney LLCs trusts

Archive