DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.


Recent Posts


Tags

Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Illinois employment law attorneys unpaid overtime Illinois workers compensation lawyer Rolling Meadows employment law attorney trusts Barrington boating accident attorney digital information drug possession advance healthcare directive minimum wage deed transfer Barrington business law firm employment law pet law Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer medical malpractice Illinois speeding lawyer back injuries Deer Park personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows business lawyer real estate leasing Illinois traffic attorney power of attorney Illinois workers compensation attorney low-ball insurance settlement Deer Park workers compensation lawyer blended families Attorney Ken Apicella Barrington employment law firm Illinois estate planning law firm living trust Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Chicago estate planning lawyer Whistleblower Claims Class A misdemeanor employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys condo association Illinois medical malpractice attorney traffic deaths Illinois business law atorneys Schaumburg drug defense lawyer POA IRELA Schaumburg employment law attorneys DUI Barrington criminal lawyer whistleblower protections landlord Barrington estate planning lawyer probate process Barrington personal injury attorney overtime pay Illinois elder law attorney senior citizens Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Arlington Heights estate planning attorney employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, digital assets Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Riverwoods estate planning lawyer loss of consortium Chicago attorney trauma after an accident meal breaks Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys DUI defense workers comp Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Illinois home inspection caretaker rights pregnant women Palatine real estate lawyer Illinois insurance disputes speeding corporate law probate lawyer digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer blood alcohol content Illinois trucking safety unpaid assessment insurance dispute privacy laws traumatic brain injuries estate planning ACA Palatine employment attorney Illinois Sales Representative Act Illinois insurance attorney Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Des Plaines real estate lawyer Barrington civil litigation attorney Palatine probate lawyer gift taxes Schaumburg auto accidents Des Plaines civil attorney Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Buffalo Grove injury lawyer personal injury attorney Des Plaines wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace employee rights trucking accident lawyers Deer Park traffic lawyer bad faith insurance claims rest breaks estate planning attorney Schaumburg criminal law attorney gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Illinois traffic attorneys breathalyzer test civil litigation attorney Arlington Heights insurance attorney Family Medical Leave Act slip and fall accidents Deer Park accident attorney Illinois wrongful termination lawyer food poisoning Crystal Lake law firm Barrington estate planning attorney liability claims Illinois civil litigation lawyer denied insurance claims pedestrian-automobile accident Palatine insurance lawyer Illinois real estate Retaliatory Discharge IRA trust transfer home inspection lawyer Inverness real estate attorney Inverness injury lawyer Chicago insurance law firm Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Barrington personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake injury attorney Crystal Lake employment attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney internet changes to mortgage law traumatic brain injury motorcycle accident Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Palatine punch death Palatine civil attorney Schaumburg criminal attorney medical malpractice claims commercial leases employment contract preventing accidents forming a corporation in Illinois Illinois workplace lawyer insurance disputes probate marijuana estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake accident attorney child safety life insurance lawyer Illinois employment law comparative negligence criminal law living trust vs will Chicago traffic lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Barrington employment attorney Schaumburg wrongful death attorney appealing an insurance claim Illinois medical malpractice lawyers medical marijuana real estate attorney dynasty trusts insurance negligence Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument cell phone accidents Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Schaumburg traffic lawyer tax attorney Chicago trucking accident attorney Rolling Meadows tax attorney defective products lawyer Fourth of July Forcible Entry Illinois business lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney Arlington Heights TBI attorney employees college kids Inverness estate planning lawyer dealing with problem employees Schaumburg personal injury attorney rollover accidents defective products Legal Info Fair Labor Standards Act personal injury law firm Chicago lawyer distracted driving accident victims medication errors Affordable Care Act Illinois wills and trusts Palatine traffic accidents Home Remodeling Repair Act employment law, Illinois employment laws compensatory time Crystal Lake traffic attorney deadly crashes Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers criminal record Crystal Lake employment law attorney Schaumburg car accident attorney South Barrington real estate attorney Palatine traffic lawyer healthcare Illinois will lawyer estate tax insurance agents caregiver pedestrian accidents Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers spinal cord injury Thanksgiving Chicago insurance claim attorneys Illinois pet lawyer jet ski texting and driving employment lawyer Crystal Lake pet attorney Rolling Meadows Illinois medical malpractice claim Illinois insurance claims lawyers Inverness corporate attorney Illinois red light cameras Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer boating under the influence Illinois traffic ticket lawyer swimming pools Des Plaines criminal attorney rollover car crashes drug crimes Barrington workers compensation attorney Illinois insurance claim attorney Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer slip and fall personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys healthcare claims controlled substance Arlington Heights accident attorney Transfer on Death Instrument GM ignition switches construction accidents Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys car collision disability benefits wrongful death Buffalo Grove real estate attorney personal injury employment attorney probate claims process Crystal Lake business law attorneys attorney fees car accident Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Illinois employment lawyer landlord tenant law privacy pain and suffering Illinois Human Rights Act Inverness accident lawyer Palatine employment law lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Illinois injury lawyer revenge porn Palatine civil litigation lawyer TBI drunk driving financial advisors sole proprietorship Schaumburg Attorney operating agreements pay when paid contract Schaumburg estate planning lawyer accidental death benefits power of attorney for healthcare real estate FSLA employee misclassification automated cars criminal BAC Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Barrington employment law attorney no contest clauses Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer personal injury claims Chicago will attorney DMV Mount Prospect real estate lawyer car crashes irrevocable trust field sobriety test Illinois insurance dispute lawyers business litigation Deer Park employment law attorney product liability car crash Illinois driving without license Schaumburg construction accident lawyer distracted driving accidents work unions federal crimes boating accidents first degree murder Schaumburg probate attorney Kenilworth estate planning lawyer living wills workers compensation Arlington Heights lawyer ken apicella uninsured motorist rumble strips Illinois employment attorneys Illinois job attorney Illinois living will Illinois personal injury attorney new real estate form underinsured motorist Illinois trusts attorney Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers jet ski accidents LLCs Illinois estate planning attorney expungement small business Home Sale Contingencies DGAA fatal car accidents Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Arlington Heights tax lawyer Arlington Heights employment attorney loopholes Illinois employment laws denial of life insurance Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Illinois criminal defense attorney Illinois car accident attorney IRS Illinois construction accident attorney severance agreements insurance denials life insurance Illinois defective products attorney murder defense subcontractor holiday statistics medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers insurance claim delay spinal cord injuries social media after death Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Rolling Meadows Attorney insurance attorney insurance adjusters creditors Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney manufacturing workers compensation benefits DUI attorney Illinois lawyer construction contracts Illinois Probate Act of 1975 personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney wrongful termination workplace sexual harassment trustee residential real estate pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Des Plaines tax law firm Barrington injury attorney Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers bicycle accidents anesthesia errors vacation home fines liability guardianship attorney personal injury claim Illinois personal injury Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Arlington Heights criminal lawyer reckless homicide drug crime Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Illinois real estate lawyer car accidents South Barrington real estate lawyer eluding a police officer Palatine corporate attorney real estate zoning Do Not Resuscitate Palatine trusts lawyer Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Schaumburg personal injury lawyer paid sick leave right to work modern family estate planning Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Barrington criminal defense lawyer agent Schaumburg insurance lawyers PTSD license Illinois law Barrington Traffic Lawyer drugs Palatine corporate law attorneys Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Landlord Tenant Ordinance hiring employees estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers real estate attorneys Palatine law firm car accident lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Deer Park medical malpractice attorney elder law Illinois Smoke Detector Act Deer Park criminal attorney Inverness elder law lawyer Des Plaines DUI attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer products liability license suspension BUI underage DUI Chicago employment attorney Des Plaines real estate attorney Buffalo Grove law firm Illinois LLC creation golf accidents car accident lawyers Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Schaumburg injury lawyer Buffalo Grove employment lawyer brain injury Kenilworth estate planning attorney Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, preventable medical errors Jay Andrew overtime violations life insurance claims Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers Chicago employment lawyer hands free device digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Palatine criminal defense lawyer Super Mario Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Des Plaines insurance attorney insurance claim traffic crimes Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Palatine business attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Schaumburg estate planning attorney insurance dispute attorney drug crimes lawyer real estate closing Des Plaines personal injury lawyers insurance denial appeals Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer medical research wills personal injury accidents Long Grove real estate attorney real estate contract mortgage Palatine elder law attorney unfunded trust Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers suspended license Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer insurance claims Illinois traffic laws traffic tickets Liquor Control Act liens Joliet general practice lawyers Chicago car accident lawyer breach of contract driving dog bites Illinois small business Inverness traffic law firm marijuana crimes attorney traffic violations Deer Park DUI lawyer special needs trust Des Plaines drug lawyer condo Crystal Lake will lawyer Illinois medical malpractice case traffic offenses institutional trustee Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act independent contractor nursing home negligence Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Employment Discrimination Law taxes Barrington litigation attorney coronavirus trust payments probate fees insurance agent negligence Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Rolling Meadows accident lawyer life insurance policy Des Plaines pet law attorney Inverness insurance attorney Self-Directed IRA Accounts Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Crystal Lake employment lawyer Deer Park real estate law firm Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Mount Prospect elder law attorney filing a medical malpractice claim Arlington Heights traffic attorney Illinois bicycle safety Illinois mortgages federal regulations for LLCs job lawyers Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Arlington Heights Attorney Rolling Meadows real estate attorney DUI penalities traffic laws insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers murder installment contracts medical malpractice compensation owner responsibility Palatine drug lawyer cell phone tower data Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer insurance claim dispute fault based insurance Long Grove real estate lawyer Crystal Lake tax lawyer Illinois employment law attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Chicago estate planning Crystal Lake car accident attorney Illinois rollover accident lawyers foreclosure bicycle dooring accidents sexual images boating DUI Chicago corporate attorney Mt Prospect Attorney Colin H. Gilbert Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Illinois estate planning health insurance dispute texting while driving Illinois boating accident lawyer motorcycle accident lawyer estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Illinois Trust Code Des Plaines injury law firm Schaumburg civil litigation attorney homestead rights Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney estate planning trusts pedestrian accident Long Grove estate planning attorneys pizza emoji traffic violations defense clemency Colin Gilbert Illinois tax attorney trucking accidents Schaumburg estate attorney wage theft surgical mistakes cell phone criminal defense Palatine estate planning lawyer Arlington Heights employment law attorneys denied insurance claim Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Deer Park traffic accident attorney CAM capital gains tax Illinois insurance lawyer Schaumburg elder law lawyer Rolling Meadows employment attorney Des Plaines accident attorney underfunded trust rent to own real estate contracts Palatine employment lawyer in terrorem provision School Visitation Rights Act car crash injuries wills and trusts Illinois DUI attorney Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys involuntary manslaughter Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Barrington real estate lawyer foreclosed rental property Illinois collections attorney mass shooting Inverness probate lawyer Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Illinois corporate lawyer civil litigation living trust benefits Des Plaines claims law firm Long Grove estate planning income distribution deducation BAIID Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer investment property vacation home license revocation Policy Cancellation Chicago biking tips estate planning for college students comp time employee discrimination Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer crossover accidents civil rights violation Illinois registered agent Illinois employee rights attorney. real estate lawyer ObamaCare fiduciary rule estate attorney Detainer Actions Exclusions bike accident Schaumburg employment attorney Rolling Meadows traffic attorney llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Crystal Lake car accident lawyer problem employees pet bites fiduciary rule delay Long Grove estate planning attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer digital evidence trench injuries Palatine construction attorney consent to a search Palatine personal injury lawyer license reinstatement drunk driving statistics Illinois probate lawyer Des Plaines collections attorney unauthorized overtime Barrington attorney Illinois attorney insurance claim denials insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission probate claims Palatine workers compensation lawyer Palatine injury attorney Inverness civil lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Barrington drug crime attorney murder charges Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer DNR natural gas estate plan contracts premises liability traffic accidents insurance claim dispute attorney Illinois personal injury lawyer hit and run accident head on collisions Inverness real estate lawyer insurance claim denial Inverness DUI lawyer truck collisions Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer sexual harassment icy parking lots IRA benefits dram shop law commercial real estate Illinois employment law firm FMLA Illinois traffic accident lawyer Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Palatine Attorney Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney startup company Schaumburg real estate lawyer natural gas explosion elder abuse commercial leasing Arlington Heights injury attorney Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Illinois

Archive