DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.


Recent Posts


Tags

creditors Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Inverness probate lawyer Crystal Lake traffic lawyer marijuana tax attorney trusts employee rights Barrington workers compensation attorney Barrington personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows accident lawyer home inspection lawyer Arlington Heights injury attorney guardianship attorney underfunded trust Colin Gilbert unpaid assessment slip and fall Schaumburg traffic lawyer car crash Inverness insurance attorney swimming pools Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute employment attorney no contest clauses Chicago employment attorney Palatine business attorney field sobriety test estate planning lawyer DUI penalities Schaumburg injury lawyer Deer Park personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney natural gas explosion Landlord Tenant Ordinance Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Illinois elder law attorney Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Crystal Lake business law attorneys Detainer Actions Palatine civil attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer medical research texting and driving commercial leasing insurance dispute Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission uninsured motorist Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Illinois living will Illinois wills and trusts attorneys controlled substance Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer natural gas employment law, Illinois employment laws insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys workers compensation Illinois trusts attorney car collision Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers denied insurance claim Palatine Attorney overtime violations Barrington attorney Chicago estate planning lawyer Illinois red light cameras Deer Park real estate law firm Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Illinois traffic accident lawyer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Arlington Heights lawyer drug possession criminal defense Illinois traffic attorney insurance claim job lawyers Do Not Resuscitate Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Illinois rollover accident lawyers Policy Cancellation School Visitation Rights Act Illinois insurance lawyer Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Illinois estate planning Illinois pedestrian accident attorney whistleblower protections Illinois DUI attorney in terrorem provision Deer Park traffic lawyer pedestrian accidents Illinois bicycle safety healthcare boating accidents Barrington boating accident attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer BUI landlord tenant law Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Palatine law firm Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers traffic deaths Chicago insurance law firm murder charges Transfer on Death Instrument LLCs Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Legal Info Schaumburg estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows employment law attorney elder law Illinois Smoke Detector Act Arlington Heights personal injury attorney crossover accidents unpaid overtime IRA benefits low-ball insurance settlement Arlington Heights accident attorney Long Grove real estate attorney criminal record living trust DMV Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Arlington Heights employment attorney real estate contract Rolling Meadows business lawyer insurance adjusters changes to mortgage law insurance negligence forming a corporation in Illinois jet ski ken apicella trucking accidents Schaumburg employment law attorneys employment contract Des Plaines claims law firm premises liability caregiver Barrington real estate lawyer personal injury claims Crystal Lake injury attorney independent contractor license suspension Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Long Grove estate planning living trust vs will Illinois business law atorneys Barrington personal injury attorney suspended license estate plan Des Plaines injury law firm automated cars liability Illinois home inspection insurance claims Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Illinois job attorney wills pedestrian-automobile accident ACA Illinois medical malpractice attorney workplace sexual harassment college kids drug crimes Illinois personal injury Des Plaines tax law firm estate attorney Illinois workers compensation attorney insurance claim denials commercial real estate DUI defense Illinois employment law attorney Illinois business lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer severance agreements condo Schaumburg elder law lawyer Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Colin H. Gilbert work unions estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Long Grove estate planning attorney Home Sale Contingencies Illinois workers compensation lawyer insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Illinois tax attorney Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Arlington Heights car accident lawyer preventable medical errors dynasty trusts residential real estate Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers fatal car accidents hit and run accident Palatine traffic accidents Deer Park DUI lawyer insurance dispute attorney involuntary manslaughter Inverness civil lawyer wrongful death comparative negligence gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Illinois estate planning attorney drunk driving statistics Des Plaines pet law attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyer advance healthcare directive Inverness DUI lawyer denied insurance claims wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Illinois wills and trusts Palatine injury attorney Palatine drug lawyer trench injuries Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Des Plaines insurance attorney reckless homicide texting while driving Mt Prospect Attorney Exclusions surgical mistakes living trust benefits product liability icy parking lots construction accidents owner responsibility Illinois insurance dispute lawyers distracted driving accident victims Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney BAIID llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association Palatine traffic lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Illinois Human Rights Act civil litigation attorney Arlington Heights TBI attorney Rolling Meadows Attorney Barrington employment law firm rollover accidents Illinois employment laws insurance claim dispute Illinois will lawyer Inverness real estate attorney PTSD Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Illinois LLC creation Palatine construction attorney Des Plaines collections attorney Illinois medical malpractice lawyers condo association Chicago attorney Rolling Meadows criminal attorney employment law traumatic brain injury Schaumburg estate attorney privacy senior citizens Illinois registered agent TBI deed transfer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer license reinstatement digital information Illinois attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers life insurance lawyer expungement manufacturing anesthesia errors criminal Chicago car accident lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Schaumburg corporate attorney Affordable Care Act employee discrimination clemency pet law modern family estate planning installment contracts Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers bike accident Schaumburg real estate lawyer Class A misdemeanor Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Deer Park employment law attorney federal regulations for LLCs Barrington litigation attorney revenge porn Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer preventing accidents wills and trusts wage theft Illinois insurance disputes Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer liens blood alcohol content Riverwoods estate planning lawyer medication errors vacation home fines Schaumburg personal injury attorney traffic accidents workers comp Chicago biking tips Illinois small business Illinois Probate Act of 1975 liability claims traffic laws food poisoning compensatory time special needs trust bad faith insurance claims personal injury startup company Schaumburg civil litigation attorney trust payments insurance agent negligence digital assets Palatine personal injury lawyer employment lawyer medical marijuana Schaumburg drug defense lawyer distracted driving accidents new real estate form Illinois traffic laws wrongful termination spinal cord injuries Illinois boating accident lawyer Chicago lawyer spinal cord injury Inverness elder law lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney loss of consortium Deer Park workers compensation lawyer pain and suffering taxes DNR dealing with problem employees Illinois traffic attorneys Illinois law car crash injuries Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer real estate leasing pet bites Buffalo Grove probate lawyer first degree murder estate planning trusts appealing an insurance claim bicycle accidents Self-Directed IRA Accounts Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney car crashes Illinois employment attorneys Illinois defective products attorney pizza emoji Palatine elder law attorney hiring employees head on collisions Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Des Plaines civil attorney rent to own real estate contracts federal crimes Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Des Plaines accident attorney Illinois collections attorney personal injury accidents Schaumburg insurance lawyers Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Barrington injury attorney deadly crashes Illinois car accident attorney Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Inverness injury lawyer pay when paid contract Long Grove estate planning attorneys Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Rolling Meadows Schaumburg criminal law attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorney corporate law Rolling Meadows employment attorney Inverness traffic law firm Chicago trucking accident attorney Schaumburg employment attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer power of attorney Schaumburg marijuana crimes attorney personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys underage DUI Illinois employment law insurance denial appeals dog bites homestead rights Crystal Lake law firm Illinois employment lawyer car accidents Des Plaines criminal attorney Des Plaines DUI attorney Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Crystal Lake car accident lawyer construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation disability benefits accidental death benefits construction contracts investment property Illinois pet lawyer Arlington Heights traffic attorney Illinois trucking safety elder abuse estate tax Palatine trusts lawyer Palatine estate planning lawyer digital evidence loopholes probate claims probate ObamaCare jet ski accidents Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer auto accidents insurance denials traumatic brain injuries Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer unauthorized overtime murder defense Buffalo Grove law firm capital gains tax Inverness personal injury attorney Family Medical Leave Act Fair Labor Standards Act Forcible Entry Des Plaines real estate lawyer Palatine employment lawyer Illinois insurance claim attorney Mount Prospect elder law attorney Palatine corporate attorney bicycle dooring accidents pedestrian accident Chicago estate planning probate lawyer Crystal Lake accident attorney South Barrington real estate attorney Retaliatory Discharge vacation home CAM Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Crystal Lake car accident attorney golf accidents Mount Prospect real estate lawyer cell phone accidents healthcare claims Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument employees Crystal Lake traffic attorney GM ignition switches Barrington business law firm Barrington estate planning attorney operating agreements Inverness corporate attorney Inverness accident lawyer DUI attorney defective products Des Plaines real estate attorney drugs real estate attorney Arlington Heights insurance attorney car accident lawyer Schaumburg car accident attorney boating under the influence probate fees trustee Des Plaines drug lawyer employee misclassification nursing home negligence Barrington drug crime attorney license revocation motorcycle accident lawyer Illinois employment law attorneys income distribution deducation traffic tickets slip and fall accidents real estate lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney driving insurance agents Chicago traffic lawyer traffic violations defense sexual images real estate trucking accident lawyers employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys mass shooting products liability civil rights violation Joliet general practice lawyers DGAA Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer health insurance dispute Schaumburg criminal attorney Rolling Meadows traffic law firm personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Barrington Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg Attorney Palatine criminal defense lawyer Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Inverness real estate lawyer Attorney Ken Apicella Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents subcontractor Des Plaines Des Plaines personal injury attorney estate planning denial of life insurance Home Remodeling Repair Act Arlington Heights trucking lawyer drug crime insurance claim delay Crystal Lake tax lawyer unfunded trust Illinois workplace discrimination attorney sole proprietorship Illinois employee rights attorney. Illinois corporate lawyer Rolling Meadows probate lawyer brain injury insurance attorney Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Palatine real estate lawyer life insurance paid sick leave medical malpractice Schaumburg probate attorney Chicago corporate attorney Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Illinois criminal defense attorney defective products lawyer estate planning attorney Deer Park medical malpractice attorney mortgage Arlington Heights Attorney insurance claim dispute attorney overtime pay cell phone tower data Super Mario Chicago will attorney Employment Discrimination Law traffic offenses Illinois insurance attorney real estate closing foreclosed rental property fiduciary rule Illinois personal injury lawyer Illinois insurance claims lawyers medical malpractice claims Palatine civil litigation lawyer personal injury claim South Barrington real estate lawyer Barrington civil litigation attorney probate process Illinois probate lawyer Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Illinois real estate Illinois civil litigation lawyer Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer blended families FSLA DUI traffic violations probate claims process BAC Liquor Control Act Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney real estate attorneys contracts Crystal Lake insurance lawyer commercial leases eluding a police officer Palatine workers compensation lawyer Illinois real estate lawyer fault based insurance Illinois workplace lawyer Illinois medical malpractice case Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyers IRELA Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer motorcycle accident problem employees Illinois mortgages digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers back injuries cell phone caretaker rights Palatine employment attorney Illinois injury lawyer Crystal Lake pet attorney minimum wage Chicago employment lawyer Chicago insurance claim attorneys murder medical malpractice compensation drunk driving filing a medical malpractice claim Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Illinois personal injury attorney Barrington employment law attorney small business social media after death Palatine probate lawyer Crystal Lake employment attorney irrevocable trust criminal law life insurance policy institutional trustee Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Schaumburg personal injury lawyer gift taxes holiday statistics Illinois employment law firm real estate zoning Illinois estate planning law firm Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney rumble strips Barrington criminal defense lawyer Palatine punch death Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney consent to a search car accident business litigation Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney estate planning for college students financial advisors boating DUI internet Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer IRA trust transfer power of attorney for healthcare Schaumburg wrongful death attorney FMLA sexual harassment foreclosure Barrington criminal lawyer Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys privacy laws Deer Park traffic accident attorney Palatine corporate law attorneys car accident lawyers Fourth of July trauma after an accident fiduciary rule delay Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer comp time personal injury law firm underinsured motorist speeding digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Illinois speeding lawyer dram shop law IRS civil litigation insurance claim denial right to work Illinois driving without license Crystal Lake employment lawyer Rolling Meadows tax attorney license Palatine insurance lawyer hands free device Illinois Sales Representative Act truck collisions Barrington employment attorney Illinois medical malpractice claim medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers child safety breathalyzer test Arlington Heights estate planning attorney agent Crystal Lake will lawyer Barrington estate planning lawyer landlord rest breaks pregnant women drug crimes lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorneys life insurance claims Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Long Grove real estate lawyer employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, personal injury lawyer POA traffic crimes Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Deer Park accident attorney breach of contract workers compensation benefits Jay Andrew Palatine employment law lawyer Whistleblower Claims Illinois insurance disputes Arlington Heights tax lawyer living wills Illinois lawyer attorney fees Thanksgiving rollover car crashes meal breaks

Archive