DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.


Recent Posts


Tags

employees Crystal Lake accident attorney right to work murder charges Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers drunk driving irrevocable trust Rolling Meadows Barrington attorney Chicago traffic lawyer Crystal Lake will lawyer Barrington personal injury attorney comparative negligence Illinois tax attorney Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute marijuana distracted driving accidents advance healthcare directive Schaumburg personal injury attorney in terrorem provision Des Plaines claims law firm agent Illinois employee rights attorney. ken apicella Palatine elder law attorney Policy Cancellation Palatine estate planning lawyer attorney fees Illinois red light cameras Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Chicago insurance claim attorneys construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Schaumburg elder law lawyer guardianship attorney Illinois personal injury lawyers texting while driving Des Plaines DUI attorney wage theft Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers liens reckless homicide Des Plaines tax law firm Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney anesthesia errors insurance claim delay Illinois elder law attorney Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer car accident lawyers IRA benefits insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Palatine corporate attorney financial advisors Crystal Lake traffic attorney Mt Prospect Attorney Employment Discrimination Law low-ball insurance settlement Fair Labor Standards Act car crash Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Rolling Meadows real estate attorney real estate contract Schaumburg probate attorney tax attorney personal injury lawyer estate attorney subcontractor employee rights Thanksgiving Illinois lawyer insurance claim Palatine traffic accidents pizza emoji Illinois insurance claim attorney Illinois personal injury lawyer Palatine Attorney Illinois defective products attorney employment lawyer elder abuse real estate leasing insurance attorney caregiver Arlington Heights tax lawyer Palatine personal injury lawyer swimming pools Illinois traffic accident lawyer caretaker rights Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer civil litigation attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer Illinois employment law attorney gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Arlington Heights real estate lawyer employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys rumble strips Illinois business law atorneys Exclusions first degree murder underage DUI Crystal Lake pet attorney disability benefits Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney auto accidents independent contractor Barrington estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer personal injury claims Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer condo digital information owner responsibility pain and suffering Illinois Human Rights Act Schaumburg civil litigation attorney insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Illinois real estate Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Deer Park personal injury lawyer BAC Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Self-Directed IRA Accounts Illinois bicycle safety living trust vs will insurance claim dispute attorney privacy Crystal Lake employment attorney Illinois traffic attorneys Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Illinois Smoke Detector Act Des Plaines personal injury lawyer natural gas Illinois employment law Detainer Actions insurance negligence medical marijuana Chicago employment lawyer liability Schaumburg Attorney Forcible Entry Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Illinois estate planning personal injury attorney Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Deer Park traffic accident attorney appealing an insurance claim Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality car collision Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Chicago trucking accident attorney estate planning for college students meal breaks traffic violations Transfer on Death Instrument llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association bicycle accidents minimum wage Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Schaumburg real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney dynasty trusts Chicago attorney holiday statistics ACA Crystal Lake car accident lawyer commercial real estate field sobriety test Rolling Meadows probate lawyer problem employees insurance agent negligence insurance denial appeals Illinois living will income distribution deducation Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Buffalo Grove law firm Crystal Lake traffic lawyer denied insurance claim DUI penalities healthcare claims Retaliatory Discharge Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer foreclosure DUI defense Barrington criminal lawyer child safety preventable medical errors slip and fall Crystal Lake car accident attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer trust payments products liability Deer Park employment law attorney Barrington personal injury lawyer boating DUI Long Grove real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance attorney personal injury claim Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer Rolling Meadows Attorney college kids Long Grove estate planning attorney deed transfer Crystal Lake employment law attorney car crash injuries surgical mistakes sole proprietorship Illinois insurance disputes license Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Arlington Heights employment attorney FMLA criminal record civil litigation overtime pay federal regulations for LLCs digital assets Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Barrington injury attorney DNR traffic violations defense murder spinal cord injuries Illinois medical malpractice attorney Palatine trusts lawyer Super Mario traffic offenses Crystal Lake tax lawyer traumatic brain injuries work unions construction accidents dram shop law Kenilworth estate planning attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer social media after death Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act workers compensation boating under the influence homestead rights Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Des Plaines pet law attorney Palatine insurance lawyer Arlington Heights Attorney filing a medical malpractice claim Deer Park accident attorney manufacturing Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers personal injury Illinois will lawyer liability claims Palatine construction attorney Chicago biking tips spinal cord injury Illinois wrongful termination lawyer medical malpractice claims marijuana crimes attorney Inverness traffic law firm defective products lawyer criminal Illinois traffic laws rent to own real estate contracts Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Joliet general practice lawyers nursing home negligence elder law Palatine punch death investment property Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer Des Plaines real estate attorney Schaumburg criminal law attorney Des Plaines blood alcohol content Colin H. Gilbert cell phone tower data Palatine employment law lawyer Illinois workplace lawyer Deer Park workers compensation lawyer PTSD wrongful death Illinois insurance claims lawyers boating accidents Illinois estate planning law firm startup company special needs trust Inverness elder law lawyer Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, vacation home fines Buffalo Grove traffic attorney DGAA Schaumburg employment attorney IRS underfunded trust jet ski landlord capital gains tax bad faith insurance claims jet ski accidents operating agreements Illinois wills and trusts insurance dispute estate planning lawyer car accidents privacy laws commercial leases unfunded trust Illinois Sales Representative Act wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Inverness DUI lawyer fatal car accidents Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Barrington real estate lawyer unpaid overtime gift taxes Illinois job attorney medical malpractice compensation Chicago insurance law firm modern family estate planning deadly crashes Barrington boating accident attorney denial of life insurance Crystal Lake law firm employee misclassification Inverness injury lawyer Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Fourth of July Illinois consent to a search Crystal Lake injury attorney Palatine traffic lawyer South Barrington real estate attorney Des Plaines insurance attorney Arlington Heights car accident lawyer pregnant women Chicago will attorney Chicago estate planning Illinois home inspection employment attorney IRA trust transfer Palatine civil attorney Inverness civil lawyer Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents mass shooting Illinois criminal defense attorney Family Medical Leave Act Rolling Meadows business lawyer School Visitation Rights Act Illinois rollover accident lawyers Inverness real estate lawyer Palatine corporate law attorneys workers compensation benefits Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Barrington civil litigation attorney Schaumburg estate planning lawyer motorcycle accident dog bites Do Not Resuscitate creditors Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Barrington Traffic Lawyer Inverness accident lawyer estate planning attorney Long Grove real estate attorney Illinois pet lawyer drunk driving statistics license reinstatement healthcare murder defense power of attorney for healthcare criminal law internet Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Illinois insurance attorney involuntary manslaughter taxes Arlington Heights insurance attorney Crystal Lake personal injury attorney probate lawyer vacation home probate process Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer GM ignition switches Illinois corporate lawyer Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers food poisoning insurance disputes insurance claim denials Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney uninsured motorist Illinois probate lawyer Des Plaines drug lawyer drug possession Chicago car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers clemency pet bites crossover accidents Palatine real estate lawyer estate planning trusts Illinois workers compensation attorney BUI CAM traffic tickets digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Palatine injury attorney Arlington Heights TBI attorney paid sick leave whistleblower protections distracted driving accident victims landlord tenant law car crashes Schaumburg corporate attorney Home Sale Contingencies Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Illinois traffic attorney digital evidence traffic deaths LLCs texting and driving Legal Info Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers trucking accidents real estate lawyer condo association Illinois DUI attorney personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys real estate Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Inverness insurance attorney estate tax Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Inverness personal injury attorney TBI changes to mortgage law natural gas explosion contracts premises liability Illinois trusts attorney Illinois medical malpractice lawyers comp time Kenilworth estate planning attorneys installment contracts Palatine civil litigation lawyer business litigation Illinois driving without license Chicago estate planning lawyer automated cars Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Illinois medical malpractice case Palatine criminal defense lawyer drug crimes lawyer Illinois business lawyer DMV living trust sexual harassment insurance dispute attorney rollover accidents Illinois real estate lawyer Mount Prospect elder law attorney head on collisions loss of consortium Jay Andrew Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney controlled substance Illinois trucking safety Illinois medical malpractice claim Illinois employment lawyer Illinois insurance lawyer Barrington litigation attorney hiring employees Palatine employment attorney probate claims process estate planning employment contract Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney trench injuries Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer pedestrian accidents traffic laws Des Plaines criminal attorney breach of contract hands free device Schaumburg estate planning attorney Deer Park traffic lawyer Crystal Lake employment lawyer Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer brain injury wrongful termination life insurance policy Des Plaines civil attorney Palatine employment lawyer South Barrington real estate lawyer real estate attorney Des Plaines accident attorney drug crime Rolling Meadows tax attorney Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney health insurance dispute Barrington drug crime attorney insurance claim dispute Illinois speeding lawyer denied insurance claims hit and run accident Arlington Heights personal injury attorney pedestrian-automobile accident insurance adjusters Palatine probate lawyer unauthorized overtime Schaumburg criminal attorney workplace sexual harassment dealing with problem employees Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer preventing accidents digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, pay when paid contract product liability Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Illinois registered agent breathalyzer test Rolling Meadows employment attorney Barrington employment law firm medical research living trust benefits no contest clauses DUI attorney Arlington Heights accident attorney employee discrimination speeding golf accidents Illinois employment law attorneys home inspection lawyer cell phone power of attorney Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Long Grove estate planning Deer Park DUI lawyer Liquor Control Act Schaumburg wrongful death attorney rest breaks criminal defense Landlord Tenant Ordinance Palatine drug lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney senior citizens probate claims insurance claims Illinois construction accident attorney trucking accident lawyers Affordable Care Act Schaumburg estate attorney revenge porn probate fees Crystal Lake business law attorneys medical malpractice IRELA employment law, Illinois employment laws medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Palatine business attorney slip and fall accidents Illinois wills and trusts attorneys back injuries Illinois small business Illinois workplace discrimination attorney Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Colin Gilbert small business Inverness probate lawyer Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Inverness real estate attorney Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer icy parking lots Deer Park real estate law firm foreclosed rental property mortgage corporate law Schaumburg Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act employment law residential real estate DUI insurance denials insurance claim denial Illinois workers compensation lawyer personal injury accidents Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney Illinois employment laws motorcycle accident lawyer job lawyers Illinois estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Illinois LLC creation Arlington Heights trucking lawyer real estate closing drugs Des Plaines injury law firm Barrington workers compensation attorney Arlington Heights car crash attorneys pedestrian accident Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer trustee Palatine workers compensation lawyer commercial leasing Class A misdemeanor underinsured motorist rollover car crashes new real estate form workers comp traffic accidents Illinois employment law firm defective products Arlington Heights injury attorney Illinois insurance dispute lawyers traffic crimes unpaid assessment Whistleblower Claims estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Illinois jet ski accident lawyer fiduciary rule delay Des Plaines real estate lawyer Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer personal injury law firm expungement federal crimes Schaumburg insurance lawyers life insurance lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyers POA Schaumburg car accident attorney Barrington employment attorney Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer loopholes car accident Des Plaines collections attorney living wills truck collisions blended families suspended license Chicago employment attorney Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Illinois injury lawyer Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument drug crimes Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm fault based insurance Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Illinois collections attorney Inverness corporate attorney civil rights violation life insurance BAIID Arlington Heights lawyer Illinois personal injury eluding a police officer Mount Prospect real estate lawyer severance agreements Palatine law firm Crystal Lake insurance lawyer FSLA traumatic brain injury Barrington business law firm wills and trusts Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Illinois civil litigation lawyer overtime violations sexual images compensatory time license suspension Illinois law Illinois attorney Chicago corporate attorney Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Illinois personal injury attorney life insurance claims real estate zoning fiduciary rule accidental death benefits institutional trustee Barrington criminal defense lawyer Chicago lawyer employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Barrington employment law attorney Barrington estate planning lawyer Illinois employment attorneys construction contracts Illinois mortgages driving forming a corporation in Illinois wills Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney medication errors trusts Illinois car accident attorney estate plan trauma after an accident insurance agents Schaumburg employment law attorneys Arlington Heights traffic attorney Illinois boating accident lawyer Home Remodeling Repair Act estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers bike accident ObamaCare car accident lawyer bicycle dooring accidents cell phone accidents probate pet law Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers real estate attorneys Attorney Ken Apicella Long Grove estate planning attorneys license revocation

Archive