Employment Discrimination in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, April 30, 2015

employment discrimination in Illinois, Rolling Meadows employment lawyerEmployees are protected from employment discrimination through federal and state laws. While the federal protections are fairly extensive, Illinois state law provides even larger groups of people with protection. Understanding these laws will enable individuals to recognize if they have been discriminated against in relation to employment.

Protected Classes

Through numerous different laws, the federal government prohibits discrimination based on:

  1. 1. Race/Color;

  2. 2. National origin;

  3. 3. Religion;

  4. 4. Sex;

  5. 5. Disability;

  6. 6. Age (for people over 40);

  7. 7. Citizenship status; and

  8. 8. Genetic information

The federal laws provide the minimum protections afforded to individuals. Through its own laws, Illinois provides protection from discrimination based on:

  1. 1. Marital status;

  2. 2. Sexual orientation;

  3. 3. Military status;

  4. 4. Unfavorable military discharge;

  5. 5. Gender identity;

  6. 6. Arrest record; and

  7. 7. Lack of permanent mailing address or using the address of a shelter or social service provider.

The Illinois Department of Human Rights (Department) investigates employment discrimination filed against private employers, state or local government, unions, and employment agencies. A charge of employment discrimination must be filed within 180 days of the alleged discrimination in order to utilize the Department to investigate. Alternatively, an individual can file a claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The Department will only investigate claims against companies with 15 or more employees, unless:

  1. 1. The charge alleges sexual harassment, retaliation, or physical or mental disability discrimination – in these circumstances only one employee subjects the employer to the anti-discrimination law;

  2. 2. The employer is a public contractor, which is defined as an employer who does business with Illinois or a unit of local government; or

  3. 3. The employer is a unit of state government.

Under the Illinois Human Rights Act, it is a civil rights violation for an “employer to refuse to hire, to segregate, or to act with respect to recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, selection for training or apprenticeship, discharge, discipline, tenure or terms, privileges or conditions of employment on the basis of unlawful discrimination or citizenship status.” It is also unlawful for an employer to impose a restriction that has the effect of prohibiting an employee from using a language to communicate in situations unrelated to the employee’s duties.

Illinois law protects against discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, or medical or common conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth. Further, the employer must provide reasonable accommodations when requested by an employee for issues related to pregnancy or childbirth unless the employer can demonstrate that providing such accommodations would impose an undue hardship on the ordinary course of the employer’s business.

Can We Help You?

Employees in Illinois are provided with a great deal of protection from employment discrimination by both federal and state law. If you believe you have been discriminated against in relation to employment, you should speak with an experienced Illinois employment law attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC serves clients throughout the northwest suburbs, including Rolling Meadows, Barrington, and Arlington Heights. 

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

How Courts Determine Damages

Web Admin - Friday, February 27, 2015

personal injury damages, Schaumburg personal injury lawyerThe ultimate goal of personal injury law is to make injured victims whole again. In theory, the law would like to allow people who suffer injuries to collect full compensation for all of the physical, economic, and emotional harms that an accident imposes on them. Of course, there are practical difficulties with doing this, such as accurately measuring emotional harms. Still, the fact that full compensation is the goal of the law is helpful for people's understanding of what damages are available to them in personal injury lawsuits.

What Damages Are Available

The law makes a wide variety of damages available to injured parties. Some of the most straightforward ones to understand are special compensatory damages. These are damages related to specific, easily calculated harms that a person suffered as a result of an accident. For instance, in a case arising out of a car accident, a person could receive special compensatory damages from the person who caused the accident to cover their medical bills and the repair bills for their car. The damages can also work based on prospective harms. For instance, if a victim can prove that their injuries prevented them from returning to work or lowered their ability to earn money, then they can also recover for those sorts of losses.

Courts can also award victims general compensatory damages. Rather than being tied to specific, calculable harms, general compensatory damages are supposed to compensate victims for the emotional harms that they suffer. Theoretically, these damages should be related to a person's pain and suffering, but as a practical matter they tend to be related to the special compensatory damages that a jury awards.

Additionally, courts have the option of awarding punitive damages. These damages are a special class of damages that are only given out rarely. Rather than the other types of damages, which focus on ensuring that victims are paid back for the harm they suffered, punitive damages exist to punish the defendant. The idea is that courts may impose these extra damages to punish defendants for particularly heinous conduct.

Comparative Negligence

Once the court calculates the full amount of the damages, there is another step. The court must determine whether the injured victim was at all responsible for the harms that they suffered. Illinois law reduces the amount of money a victim can recover by the amount of responsibility that they bear for the accident. For instance, if a pedestrian is crossing against a light and gets struck by a drunk driver, the court may find them responsible for some amount of their own injuries. Suppose the court decides that the pedestrian was responsible for 10 percent of their harm; here they can only recover 90 percent of their total damages.

Traffic accidents can lead to life changing injuries. Fortunately, the law gives people options for how to handle these situations. If you were injured in a traffic accident and want to learn more about your rights, contact an Illinois personal injury attorney today. Our firm represents victims in many northwest suburban towns, including Schaumburg, Inverness, and Barrington.

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Rauner Introduces Right to Work Order

Web Admin - Monday, February 23, 2015

Illinois right to work order, Palatine employment law attorneyBefore being elected governor, Gov. Rauner worked in the private sector, and as a result one of the major focuses of his campaign was making the state's economic climate friendlier to businesses. Although he is proposing a variety of changes such as workers' compensation reform that would likely need the approval of the legislature, he has just taken a small step with a recent executive order. The executive order essentially institutes a version of right to work laws for public sector employees, and some commentators think it may be the governor testing the waters for introducing a more general right to work law.

Right to Work Generally

The purpose of right to work laws is to allow workers to choose whether they want to participate in a union. Currently, workers in companies where they would be represented by unions are allowed not to participate in the union, but they still have union dues deducted from their paychecks. From one angle this makes sense, since even non-union workers get the benefits of the union's existence, such as higher wages and better benefits. Forced collection of union dues prevents people from free-riding on the work of other people who pay for and participate in the union. However, there are many employees for whom the union dues represent a significant cost. Public sector employees who would be affected by the governor's order have hundreds of dollars a year taken from their pay for unions. Right to work lets the employees put that money towards the things that they think are most important.

Rauner's Executive Order

For most people, Governor Rauner's executive order does not change anything. It only implements right to work rules for the public sector employees represented by unions. Workers in the private sector will still be required to pay union dues if they were before. Additionally, the new order is being challenged in the courts as an over-extension of the governor's executive authority. The court has put a stay on the enforcement of the order until its constitutionality is decided.

Although the order does not directly affect most employees, it may be a sign of where the governor may be making changes in the future. In the past, right to work laws have not been a major issue in Illinois because, of the surrounding states, only Iowa had one. However, other states in the area have already passed or are moving to pass right to work legislation. These states include Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, and Missouri. This may lead to a stronger push for private sector right to work legislation in Illinois in an effort to prevent businesses from crossing borders into neighboring states.

The field of employment law is constantly changing. If you are worried about whether your business is in compliance with it or you think your rights as an employee are being violated, contact an Illinois employment law attorney today. Our firm serves clients across the northwest suburbs, including in Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

Ken ApicellaAbout the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Payment for Unauthorized Overtime

Web Admin - Friday, September 19, 2014

payment for unauthorized overtime, Palatine employment law attorneyThe law related to wage and hour violations is a complex legal area that touches virtually every employee. These laws lay out employees' rights with regard to things like when they may be paid, how much they must be paid, and the various overtime rules. The overtime rules are some of the most difficult, and can often lead to violations by employers, either knowingly or simply by virtue of not understanding their full complexity. Regardless of the reason for the violation, employees should be aware of their legal rights so that they can enforce them in case something goes wrong.

One of the most common issues that arises with overtime is the idea of “unauthorized overtime.” Many companies have a policy in place that requires employees to get supervisor permission before they work overtime, because overtime switches them to an increased hourly salary. However, this policy can cause confusion when an employee works unauthorized overtime. Some companies refuse to pay workers extra for unauthorized overtime work, but that refusal is a violation of federal law.

The Fair Labor Standards Act

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is the major piece of federal legislation governing things like overtime pay and wage and hour violations. For the purposes of the question about unauthorized overtime, the important section is 203(g), which defines the word employ. A company employs someone when it “suffer[s] or permit[s]” the person to work. Such a broad definition of the word employ means that even if the company has not authorized the overtime hours, they are still allowing the overtime work to happen. The fact that they allowed it at all means that the employee must be paid properly for their time, regardless of any company policy. However, employers are still allowed to take certain steps related to authorizing overtime.

What Employers May Do

Just because employers must pay their workers for unauthorized overtime does not mean that they are not allowed to have a system for approving overtime beforehand. Companies are allowed to decide whether they want their employees working extra time or would rather simply have the project completed at a later date. In fact, companies are even allowed to institute disciplinary procedures related to working overtime without the proper authorization. Yet, even with such procedures in place, if the employee still works overtime, they must be paid accordingly, even if they are also disciplined for violating the company policy related to unauthorized overtime.

Employees who have been the victim of wage and hour violations often feel powerless to stand up to their employers. If you believe that you are owed extra overtime pay, contact a skilled Illinois employment lawyer today. Our dedicated team can help provide you with the backup you need to enforce your legal rights as an employee. We assist clients in Palatine, Des Plaines, Buffalo Grove, and those throughout the suburban Chicagoland area.

About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Overtime Violations in Restaurants

Web Admin - Tuesday, May 27, 2014

illinois overtime violationsWage theft is an increasingly common practice in which employers deprive their workers of wages they are owed through practices like improperly logging their hours or simply failing to pay wages fully and promptly. The problem is serious enough that a report from the Center for Urban Economic Development at the University of Illinois at Chicago estimates that workers in Cook County lose more than one million dollars a day to the practice. One of the most common methods of wage theft is through the violation of overtime laws. Overtime in the restaurant industry is a particular problem because of how overtime rules interact with minimum wage provisions and the tip credit.

Understanding the Tip Credit

The tip credit is a specific exception to minimum wage law that allows employers to pay employees less than minimum wage on the assumption that the worker’s tips will make up the difference. Restaurants are one of the main industries that can take advantage of the tip credit because of their high percentage of tipped employees, such as servers and bartenders.

The exact amount of the tip credit varies by state. In Illinois, employers may deduct up to 40 percent of the Illinois minimum wage as tip credit, giving a new minimum wage of $4.95. The tip credit is a complex piece of the minimum wage law that can give rise to a variety of violations by employers. One of the most complicated of these issues related to the tip credit is how it interacts with overtime law.

The Tip Credit and Overtime

Generally speaking, overtime laws require employers to pay their workers one and a half times their hourly wage for working more than 40 hours in a week. However, restaurants and other employers can still take advantage of the tip credit. Unfortunately, many do so incorrectly. The issue is that many employers take the tip credit out before multiplying the hourly wage by one and a half, when they should take it out after. To illustrate the difference, suppose a server works 60 hours in one week and is paid $4.95 an hour plus tips.

For the first 40 hours, the employer can simply pay the $4.95, but for the last 20 they need to start paying overtime. The incorrect way to do the calculation would be to simply multiply the $4.95 wage by 1.5 giving a new wage of $7.43, which would result in a paycheck of $148.60 for those 20 hours. The proper way to perform the calculation is to multiply the full minimum wage, $8.25, by 1.5 to get $12.38, and then subtract the tip credit afterwards to get a minimum wage of $9.08 and a paycheck of $181.60, a serious difference from the incorrect calculation.

If you believe you have been the victim of an overtime violation, contact an Illinois employment lawyer today. Our firm helps clients in many towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Palatine, Barrington, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Employers Offering "Comp" Time Instead of Overtime

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 11, 2014

illinois overtime employee lawyerMany employees are owed overtime by their employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) once they work more than 40 hours in a week. Illinois also has a separate wage and hour law that comes into effect at the same 40-hour mark. While many employers dutifully obey these laws and pay the qualifying employees time-and-a-half during overtime, sometimes, either intentionally or by mistake, employers subvert these laws. One of the most common ways that employers attempt to get around paying overtime is through the use of compensatory or "comp" time instead of overtime.

This practice involves employers allowing a worker to take paid hours off in the future based on the amount of overtime hours worked. Most commonly these hours off will be either equal to the amount of overtime, or an hour and a half off for each hour of overtime.

Who Is Entitled to Overtime?

The first step in determining whether an employer is violating wage and hour laws related to overtime is to find out if the law mandates overtime for the employee in question. The first place to look is in the FLSA, which governs overtime requirements on a federal level. The FLSA qualifies all hourly employees for overtime pay, unless they fall into a list of exemptions. The Department of Labor provides a full list of exempt employees. Some of the most commonly applicable exemptions are:

  • - Sales employees working on commission;
  • - Computer professionals making at least $23.67 an hour;
  • - Drivers, loaders, and mechanics employed by motor carriers;
  • - Salesmen, partsmen, and mechanics who work for automobile dealerships; and
  • - Executive, administrative, and professional employees who are paid on a salaried basis.

Illinois’ wage and hour law also contains a list of exemptions, though these largely overlap with the FLSA’s list. For an employee to be exempt from overtime requirements, their occupation would need to be exempted from both the FLSA and the Illinois overtime law.

Is Comp Time Legal?

If a private sector employee falls under the ambit of overtime laws, then paying them with compensatory time instead of an overtime rate violates overtime laws. The purpose of those laws is to provide employees a premium for working overtime, which comp time circumvents. Importantly, this rationale does not apply to all rearrangements of schedules. The overtime laws focus on a weekly time scale, meaning that working more than eight hours in a day does not qualify a person for overtime, and an employer is allowed to shift time within the week to keep an employee below the 40 hour threshold. It is only the banking of paid time off in lieu of an overtime premium that violates the law.

If you believe you have been the victim of an overtime violation like comp time, reach out to a Barrington employment lawyer today. Our team handles cases in many northwest suburbs, including Schaumburg, Rolling Meadows, and Palatine.

About the Author: Attorney Ken Apicella is a founding partner of DGAA focusing in the areas of personal injury, employment, insurance coverage disputes, and civil litigation. Ken earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 1999. He has been named a SuperLawyers Rising Star and a Forty Illinois Attorneys Under Forty to Watch. Ken has written and lectured for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education and regularly serves as a moderator at Northwest Suburban Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education seminars.

Retaliatory Discharge in Illinois: The Basics

Web Admin - Tuesday, November 05, 2013

Under the “at will” employment doctrine, employers are typically able to fire an employee for virtually any reason. There are some exceptions, however, including statutory rules which prevent employment discrimination against certain protected classes. Another exception is known as a “retaliatory discharge.”

What It Is

Essentially, the law, as outlined by the Illinois Supreme Court, allows an employee to recover damages if they show that they were fired from a job for engaging in legally protected conduct and that their termination violated public policy interests. A 1978 Supreme Court case, Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc. was the first in the state to define this tort.

Historically, there are two general types of situations where employees have won retaliatory discharge cases. The first is where an employee was fired for making a worker’s compensation claim.  To prevail in these situations, the burden is on the employee to affirmatively show that the termination was spurred by their seeking worker’s compensation.

In addition, employers can be liable for a retaliatory discharge when they fire an employee for reporting on improper conduct or refusing to participate in that conduct. For example, in one Illinois case, Palmateer v. International Harvester, an employee was fired after going to the police to share information about a fellow employee’s illegal actions. In another case decided by an Illinois appellate court, an employee won a claim after being fired for refusing to falsify pension plans--which itself violated federal law.

Retaliatory Discharge Damages

To pursue one of these cases, an employee must file a civil lawsuit specifically alleging that they were terminated in violation of these rules. But what sort of damages can the employee recover if they win?

Under Illinois case law, employees who win a retaliatory discharge case are generally able to recover lost wages from the date that the termination occurred until they find a new job. However, that does not mean that the employee can simply do nothing and collect a paycheck. Instead, courts have ruled that the employee has a duty to mitigate their damages by taking reasonable steps to find permanent work.

In addition, depending on the specifics of the case, a plaintiff may also seek punitive damages. Punitive damages are intended to punish the conduct of the employer (instead of merely compensating the harmed party). These damages are only a possibility when the defendant’s conduct is particularly egregious. 

Legal Help

If you have questions about a potential retaliatory discharge case, contact a Palatine employment lawyer today. Call 847-934-6000 to speak to a member of our team. We serve many Northwest Suburban areas including Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and other nearby communities.

Recent Posts


revenge porn Buffalo Grove injury lawyer ObamaCare underage DUI Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Des Plaines drug lawyer medical malpractice claims pedestrian accidents deed transfer Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer low-ball insurance settlement Arlington Heights personal injury attorney drugs changes to mortgage law Arlington Heights tax lawyer Palatine elder law attorney Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Barrington personal injury attorney Palatine civil litigation lawyer employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers bicycle accidents Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys GM ignition switches Palatine trusts lawyer pain and suffering breach of contract real estate contract Palatine employment lawyer Long Grove real estate attorney Illinois speeding lawyer Barrington boating accident attorney digital assets living trust benefits defective products Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers fatal car accidents civil litigation attorney construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer automated cars criminal law Des Plaines criminal attorney new real estate form filing a medical malpractice claim Schaumburg Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer owner responsibility digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Deer Park traffic lawyer traffic accidents IRA trust transfer Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys insurance claim dispute personal injury claims power of attorney Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Des Plaines collections attorney Schaumburg civil litigation attorney murder defense Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer preventing accidents Palatine punch death Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer murder charges Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney Crystal Lake accident attorney advance healthcare directive landlord drunk driving Arlington Heights insurance attorney fiduciary rule FMLA DGAA Illinois LLC creation probate product liability Do Not Resuscitate Palatine criminal defense lawyer Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney Chicago employment lawyer swimming pools Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Barrington personal injury lawyer estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Crystal Lake law firm privacy food poisoning probate claims Des Plaines tax law firm Illinois trucking safety traffic offenses Barrington estate planning attorney Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer life insurance claims insurance adjusters Mount Prospect real estate lawyer real estate attorneys Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer insurance agent negligence Attorney Ken Apicella Des Plaines injury law firm cause-of-death exclusions Transfer on Death Instrument Barrington Traffic Lawyer Illinois workplace lawyer insurance negligence Illinois personal injury lawyers Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Exclusions Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Inverness insurance attorney top life insurance claim denials Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Barrington drug crime attorney estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers preventable medical errors Inverness injury lawyer blood alcohol content brain injury car crash injuries attorney fees denial of life insurance Barrington injury attorney auto accidents Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Buffalo Grove law firm boating accidents insurance claim dispute attorney foreclosure Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Barrington employment attorney personal injury accidents tax attorney personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Palatine civil attorney mortgage Illinois tax attorney Illinois personal injury attorney Illinois traffic accident lawyer pet bites living trust vs will Palatine traffic lawyer wrongful termination Illinois employment lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyers life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim Chicago insurance law firm construction accidents Illinois blended families Palatine insurance lawyer problem employees fault based insurance Schaumburg car accident attorney Deer Park criminal attorney Illinois living will Arlington Heights traffic attorney Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer insurance claims icy parking lots Buffalo Grove traffic attorney institutional trustee comp time loopholes Illinois personal injury lawyer Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers trauma after an accident Illinois Sales Representative Act Illinois small business wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Schaumburg corporate attorney Schaumburg employment attorney employment contract dealing with problem employees expungement insurance dispute attorney Illinois pet lawyer Illinois criminal defense attorney subcontractor Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Class A misdemeanor Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer rollover car crashes Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer wrongful death Palatine workers compensation lawyer Schaumburg criminal law attorney ken apicella employee discrimination gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys internet car collision disability benefits estate planning pizza emoji Illinois corporate lawyer Illinois pedestrian accident attorney underinsured motorist Barrington employment law firm crossover accidents Arlington Heights injury attorney Illinois estate planning car crash CAM unpaid assessment insurance claim denial senior citizens manufacturing Inverness civil lawyer employment attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyer homestead rights first degree murder Crystal Lake car accident attorney Illinois business law atorneys Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Barrington litigation attorney unpaid overtime medication errors Palatine estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury attorney business litigation corporate law condo association rent to own real estate contracts Employment Discrimination Law Inverness elder law lawyer Liquor Control Act distracted driving accident victims personal injury right to work Rolling Meadows tax attorney Illinois attorney DUI defense pedestrian accident bike accident insurance agents commercial leases Illinois bicycle safety Long Grove estate planning Illinois trusts attorney murder POA elder abuse Inverness traffic law firm traffic violations Illinois real estate lawyer Palatine corporate attorney Schaumburg personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows business lawyer caretaker rights estate planning lawyer personal injury claim traffic laws Schaumburg life insurance attorney distracted driving accidents Arlington Heights accident attorney in terrorem provision probate fees TBI pregnant women Illinois business lawyer life insurance insurance claim insurance claim denials Des Plaines real estate lawyer Retaliatory Discharge Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney Inverness accident lawyer pedestrian-automobile accident wage theft Illinois employment law civil rights violation residential real estate DNR anesthesia errors Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission elder law cell phone accidents cell phone tower data Illinois wills and trusts denied insurance claims life insurance lawyer LLCs Barrington estate planning lawyer construction contracts slip and fall accidents Arlington Heights employment law attorneys forming a corporation in Illinois sexual harassment Schaumburg personal injury lawyers car crashes Schaumburg personal injury lawyer trusts PTSD Colin H. Gilbert Palatine Attorney Rolling Meadows meal breaks life insurance policy Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer real estate insufficient documentation denial of insurance claim Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Illinois insurance lawyer field sobriety test Illinois employee rights attorney. how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims Illinois red light cameras privacy laws real estate zoning car accident Schaumburg estate attorney Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer power of attorney for healthcare living wills Des Plaines pet law attorney Barrington life insurance lawyer Illinois insurance disputes Inverness probate lawyer Illinois employment law firm modern family estate planning Landlord Tenant Ordinance Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm Policy Cancellation Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Long Grove estate planning attorney paid sick leave rest breaks Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers cell phone Illinois estate planning law firm Arlington Heights lawyer Illinois workers compensation attorney slip and fall unauthorized overtime Deer Park traffic accident attorney no contest clauses employment law medical malpractice employee rights Barrington workers compensation attorney Illinois real estate workers compensation Chicago biking tips Palatine probate lawyer foreclosed rental property Schaumburg insurance lawyers Palatine life insurance lawyer defective products lawyer Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents Schaumburg employment law attorneys Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney wills civil litigation Barrington business law firm Des Plaines appealing an insurance claim severance agreements probate process employment law, Illinois employment laws Deer Park accident attorney spinal cord injuries premises liability federal regulations for LLCs Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney insurance disputes Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Long Grove estate planning attorneys clemency Illinois collections attorney employees truck collisions Arlington Heights Attorney Riverwoods estate planning lawyer traumatic brain injury healthcare claims personal injury law firm Illinois Human Rights Act accidental death benefits traffic violations defense pet law Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer car accident lawyer BUI Illinois traffic attorney digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Illinois employment law attorneys Home Sale Contingencies Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer driving insurance dispute trench injuries Palatine corporate law attorneys workers comp Rolling Meadows Attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer nursing home negligence Schaumburg criminal attorney Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers probate lawyer Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer trustee medical research IRELA workplace sexual harassment child safety boating DUI Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act FSLA Illinois traffic laws probate claims process Palatine employment attorney Detainer Actions wills and trusts Illinois driving without license Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer consent to a search traffic deaths bicycle dooring accidents income distribution deducation Illinois law Self-Directed IRA Accounts Illinois insurance claims lawyers Deer Park DUI lawyer Illinois DUI attorney controlled substance Barrington medical malpractice lawyers surgical mistakes estate plan Chicago lawyer trucking accidents ACA Thanksgiving Illinois injury lawyer Barrington attorney drug possession Chicago car accident lawyer unfunded trust Schaumburg real estate lawyer loss of consortium healthcare Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers real estate lawyer hiring employees Palatine injury attorney Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney drug crimes digital evidence Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys commercial leasing Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Palatine law firm Illinois insurance claim attorney Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers BAIID marijuana personal injury lawyer DUI penalities insurance claim delay health insurance dispute Illinois probate lawyer traffic crimes Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Illinois medical malpractice claim Deer Park personal injury lawyer Kenilworth estate planning attorney Crystal Lake employment lawyer investment property Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Fair Labor Standards Act installment contracts Chicago attorney Des Plaines accident attorney traumatic brain injuries Illinois rollover accident lawyers Crystal Lake business law attorneys fiduciary rule delay holiday statistics estate tax capital gains tax Deer Park employment law attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer Illinois will lawyer criminal record liability Schaumburg probate attorney South Barrington real estate lawyer Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Schaumburg Attorney trucking accident lawyers Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Forcible Entry bad faith insurance claims employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Illinois personal injury license suspension Illinois lawyer Chicago life insurance attorney Crystal Lake insurance lawyer insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys special needs trust Barrington employment law attorney small business eluding a police officer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney commercial real estate Illinois registered agent Inverness real estate lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney Illinois job attorney operating agreements Chicago trucking accident attorney Long Grove real estate lawyer Illinois employment attorneys School Visitation Rights Act Kenilworth estate planning lawyer federal crimes Arlington Heights TBI attorney natural gas BAC Chicago traffic lawyer Illinois workers compensation lawyer Fourth of July Illinois traffic ticket lawyer real estate attorney estate planning for college students Illinois defective products attorney traffic tickets DUI insurance denial appeals Illinois employment laws workers compensation benefits Des Plaines insurance attorney Barrington civil litigation attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer DUI attorney Illinois insurance attorney boating under the influence Illinois medical malpractice case Joliet general practice lawyers Chicago estate planning lawyer Schaumburg construction accident lawyer employment lawyer Schaumburg wrongful death attorney sole proprietorship Palatine drug lawyer Affordable Care Act Palatine construction attorney most common reasons for life insurance claim denials Illinois workplace discrimination attorney deadly crashes criminal Home Remodeling Repair Act IRA benefits overtime violations Illinois Trust Code Des Plaines civil attorney pay when paid contract products liability Crystal Lake injury attorney back injuries golf accidents college kids license jet ski accidents Chicago employment attorney coronavirus criminal defense South Barrington real estate attorney job lawyers llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association taxes Inverness corporate attorney texting and driving Illinois Probate Act of 1975 mass shooting dog bites condo insurance denials drug crimes lawyer real estate leasing Des Plaines real estate attorney living trust compensatory time vacation home Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Chicago corporate attorney independent contractor Illinois medical malpractice attorney financial advisors Chicago estate planning digital information Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney car accident lawyers Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Illinois Smoke Detector Act license reinstatement Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Schaumburg drug defense lawyer Colin Gilbert caregiver Super Mario Illinois estate planning attorney agent estate attorney Deer Park real estate law firm work unions Illinois traffic attorneys social media after death Palatine business attorney dynasty trusts underfunded trust Crystal Lake traffic attorney Palatine real estate lawyer Palatine personal injury lawyer Whistleblower Claims Illinois civil litigation lawyer license revocation Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer medical marijuana lapse in policy Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers irrevocable trust involuntary manslaughter Illinois boating accident lawyer material misrepresentation motorcycle accident spinal cord injury dram shop law natural gas explosion texting while driving hit and run accident Crystal Lake will lawyer Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Illinois employment law attorney Crystal Lake employment attorney medical malpractice compensation Family Medical Leave Act rumble strips Illinois mortgages Arlington Heights employment attorney Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Des Plaines DUI attorney Barrington real estate lawyer Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer speeding liens insurance attorney Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Schaumburg estate planning attorney sexual images marijuana crimes attorney landlord tenant law head on collisions Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer breathalyzer test overtime pay Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Chicago insurance claim attorneys rollover accidents Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney reckless homicide Buffalo Grove probate lawyer uninsured motorist home inspection lawyer guardianship attorney Des Plaines claims law firm beneficiary complications Palatine traffic accidents Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Schaumburg traffic lawyer Palatine employment law lawyer estate planning trusts Schaumburg elder law lawyer drunk driving statistics contracts personal injury attorney minimum wage Legal Info whistleblower protections jet ski Inverness real estate attorney insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys trust payments Illinois car accident attorney Barrington criminal lawyer Illinois wrongful termination lawyer real estate closing Crystal Lake tax lawyer Crystal Lake pet attorney Illinois elder law attorney suspended license estate planning attorney Arlington Heights car crash attorneys IRS car accidents Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Mt Prospect Attorney Illinois home inspection gift taxes Chicago will attorney Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Inverness DUI lawyer liability claims denied insurance claim drug crime vacation home fines employee misclassification Rolling Meadows employment attorney comparative negligence Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Mount Prospect elder law attorney Jay Andrew startup company Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers creditors motorcycle accident lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm hands free device Barrington criminal defense lawyer DMV