DGAA bLAWg

Driver’s License Suspension

Web Admin - Thursday, December 03, 2015

driver’s license suspension, Crystal Lake Criminal Defense AttorneyFor many people, the ability to drive is very important. It allows individuals to travel easily to important places, like work or school, as well as to places for recreation or other leisure activities. Unfortunately, the right to drive can be taken away. When an individual has his or her license suspended, he or she may be tempted to continue to drive anyway, which can lead to significant consequences. 

Reasons for Suspension 

The Secretary of State (SOS) can suspend a person’s driver’s license for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following: 

1. Three or more moving violations within a 12-month period;

2. Failure to appear in court for a traffic violation;

3. Ten or more unpaid parking violations;

4. Five or more unpaid automated traffic violations (being photographed for running a red light);

5. Failure to pay child support;

6. Failure to pay fines for five or more toll violations;

7. Causing an accident while driving without car insurance; or

8. Driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, an illegal substance, or prescription medication. 

The SOS notifies an individual of a pending license suspension by mail, sent to the last address on file at the SOS. As a result, it is important to update the SOS when a change of address occurs. 

Penalties for Driving 

An individual that chooses to drive while his or her license is suspended can be subjected to various penalties, including: 

1. The suspension period being extended for the same length as was originally imposed;

2. Possible license revocation;

3. Jail time;

4. Seizure of the car’s license plates; or

5. Immobilization of the person’s vehicle. 

Under Illinois law, driving on a suspended license is a Class A misdemeanor. The length of any jail sentence or amount of community service ordered depends on the reason why the license was suspended. For example, a person who drives after he or she had their license suspended for DUI can be sentenced to imprisonment for up to 10 consecutive days or 30 days of community service. 

Importantly, a second or subsequent violation becomes a Class 4 felony if the person is the proximate cause of an accident that results in personal injury or death to another person. A personal injury includes a Type A injury, which is defined as severe bleeding, distorted extremities, and any injuries that are require the person to be carried from the scene. A Class 4 felony is punishable by imprisonment of up to three years, with a minimum sentence of one year. 

It is important that you do not drive while your license is suspended—doing so can lead to serious penalties. Yet, this may be difficult, as our reliance on being able to drive our own vehicles is so strong. If you are facing charges of driving on a suspended license, please contact an experienced Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm provides help for individuals located in Crystal Lake, Schaumburg, Palatine, Des Plaines, Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, Arlington Heights, Inverness, and Deer Park.  

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Source:  

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K6-303


Fleeing or Eluding a Police Officer

Web Admin - Friday, November 06, 2015

eluding a police officer, Crystal Lake criminal defense attorneyUnder most circumstances, an individual readily complies when he or she sees a police officer signal for him or her to pull over and stop. However, in cases where a driver attempts to flee or elude an officer, there are potentially significant consequences. 

Fleeing or Eluding 

Under Illinois law, a driver of a vehicle commits a Class A misdemeanor if he or she intentionally fails or refuses to obey an officer’s visual or audible signal or direction to bring the vehicle to a stop. This violation includes if the driver increases the speed he or she is traveling, turns off his or her lights, or otherwise flees or attempts to elude the officer. 

A signal given by an officer can occur in a variety of ways. However, an officer must be in uniform and, if the officer is driving, he or she must show illuminated red or blue lights which indicate that the vehicle is a police vehicle when used along with an audible siren. 

A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by a jail sentence of up to one year, with a fine of up to $2,500. The Secretary of State will suspend an individual’s driver’s license upon receipt of the notice of a conviction. A suspension lasts for a period of up to six months for a first conviction and up to 12 months for a second conviction. If an individual has committed three or more violations of fleeing or eluding an officer, the offense is a Class 4 felony, and is punishable by not less than one year in jail, with a maximum sentence of up to three years. 

Aggravated Fleeing or Eluding 

A similar, yet more serious offense is aggravated fleeing or eluding an officer. This offense occurs if all of the requirements of fleeing or eluding are satisfied and, while that offense is committed, the driver: 

1. Commits two or more moving violations (such as failing to stop at a red light);

2. Exceeds the speed limit by 20 miles per hour or more;

3. Causes physical harm another person;

4. Causes property damage greater than $300; or

5. Conceals or alters the vehicle’s registration plate. 

Due to the nature of most fleeing or eluding attempts, one of the above actions can easily occur during the attempt to escape the police. For example, it is likely that a person fleeing will drive at a high rate of speed or ignore traffic signals and signs. If one of the above occurs, the penalties for the attempt at fleeing or eluding increase significantly. 

Aggravated fleeing or eluding is a Class 4 felony, with a second or subsequent offense becoming a Class 3 felony. Further, the Secretary of State will revoke the driver’s license of a convicted individual and the motor vehicle used in the fleeing or eluding is subject to a seizure and forfeiture. 

Help Defending Criminal Charges 

If you have been charged with the offenses of fleeing or eluding, you face potentially serious penalties. For more information about these charges and your defense rights, please contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our firm proudly represents individuals throughout the northwest suburbs, in communities such as Crystal Lake, Deer Park, Schaumburg, Inverness, Palatine, Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Buffalo Grove.


About the Author:
 Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Source:  
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K11-204


The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Underage DUI Penalties in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, September 02, 2014

underage drunk driving DUI, Illinois DUI lawyerThe State of Illinois takes all instances of DUIs seriously, but it punishes people under the legal drinking age even more severely. This is because, according to statistics compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 25 percent of fatal car crashes involving teens include at least one underage drunk driver

In order to deal with this issue, the state imposes the standard DUI penalties on underage drivers, and it also tacks on extra zero tolerance penalties. These zero tolerance penalties involve suspensions of driving privileges in circumstances beyond those that would ordinarily qualify as a DUI, and may even involve penalties accruing to the parents of the driver as well.

Standard DUI Penalties

Underage drivers under the influence of alcohol are still subject to standard DUI penalties, but these penalties differ from the DUI penalties for people over the age of 21 in two important respects. First, these penalties are harsher than ordinary DUI penalties. The penalties include a possible $2,500 fine and a license revocation of at least two years, along with up to a year in prison. A second offense comes with the same penalties except that the minimum license revocation increases to five years. Second, these penalties are easier for underage drinkers to trigger. Ordinarily, a DUI charge requires a person to have a blood alcohol content (BAC) of greater than .08. This is still true for underage drinkers, unless there is other evidence proving they were impaired. If such evidence exists, the required BAC drops to .05.

Zero Tolerance Penalties

In addition to the above penalties for an actual DUI charge, underage drinkers can face a host of driving-related penalties. For instance, even if an underage driver registers below a .05, they may still face penalties under zero tolerance laws. Zero tolerance penalties apply to underage drivers who register more than a .00 BAC without triggering full DUI penalties. These zero tolerance penalties include a three-month suspension of driving privileges for a first offense, and a one year suspension for a second offense. Additionally, the law doubles these penalties if the young driver refuses to consent to the necessary testing.

The law also imposes extra penalties on the parents of underage drunk drivers in certain circumstances. If death or great bodily harm results from the parents knowingly allowing underage drinking in their home, then prosecutors may charge the parents with a class 4 felony, which comes with a prison sentence ranging from one to three years and a fine of up to $25,000. Additionally, the parents may be liable for any damage that occurs because of underage drinkers leaving the premises.

If you or your child has recently been charged with a DUI or similar crime, seek help from an Illinois DUI attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers serves clients across the northwest Chicago suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Deer Park.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Palatine Punching Death Leads to Murder Charge

Web Admin - Wednesday, August 20, 2014

palatine criminal defense lawyerA recent death in Palatine, Illinois highlights the ease with which a person can find themselves charged with first degree murder. The incident in question relates to the punching death of a 26-year-old man on July 18th. According to police, another man confronted the victim out in front of a local bar. The assailant allegedly threw a single punch and knocked the victim to the ground. Upon falling, the victim struck his head on the sidewalk, and he was rushed to Lutheran General Hospital. The state initially charged the assailant with aggravated battery, but when the victim died, the charges were upgraded to first degree murder.

Understanding First Degree Murder

When people hear the charge of first degree murder they often focus on concepts like wantonness or premeditation, but in reality the requirements for first degree murder are much simpler. The Illinois criminal code states that a person commits first degree murder when they perform an act that causes a person’s death and they either intend to cause the person’s death or great bodily harm, or they know that their actions will cause the person’s death or great bodily harm, or they know that there is a high probability that their act will cause death or great bodily harm to another person. In this case, even the single punch thrown by the assailant could rise to the level of intent to cause great bodily harm.

However, simply having the intent to do great bodily harm does not necessarily, on its own, tell the full story. This is because the law also contains mitigating factors, circumstances that make the crime less serious because of their existence.

Possible Defenses

The law in Illinois codifies two specific circumstances that can reduce a first degree murder charge down to second degree murder. First, the charge can be reduced if the assailant, at the time of the killing, is “acting under a sudden and intense provocation” that was caused by the victim. Importantly, the provocation in such instances must be quite serious, and merely being insulted would not rise to the level of a mitigating factor. Instead, things like watching someone attack a loved one or being involved in a barroom brawl are often cited as possible scenarios that may count as provocation.

The other scenario that can result in a reduction to second degree murder is when a person commits first degree murder, but does so believing that they have a legal justification for doing so. For instance, if the person believes that they are acting in self-defense when they kill someone, but that belief is not reasonable, they still may have their first degree murder charge reduced to second degree murder.

If you or someone you love has been charged with a criminal offense, seek the help of an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our firm can analyze your case, and help ensure that you and your interests are fairly represented in court. We represent clients in towns across the northwest suburbs including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Palatine.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

agent capital gains tax DNR unauthorized overtime drunk driving Class A misdemeanor Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer fault based insurance internet Attorney Ken Apicella fatal car accidents license suspension probate lawyer Illinois employment attorneys Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Arlington Heights employment attorney Inverness real estate attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows business lawyer Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Palatine probate lawyer Illinois speeding lawyer work unions Schaumburg elder law lawyer landlord tenant law construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation commercial leases Arlington Heights tax lawyer condo association driving drugs Chicago lawyer natural gas unpaid overtime Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Illinois medical malpractice lawyers insurance disputes Illinois wills and trusts Illinois jet ski accident lawyer employment attorney Schaumburg drug defense lawyer power of attorney underage DUI PTSD Chicago car accident lawyer products liability Des Plaines pet law attorney Colin H. Gilbert DMV Schaumburg personal injury attorney BUI car accident lawyer Arlington Heights estate planning attorney probate claims process Palatine real estate lawyer Schaumburg criminal law attorney head on collisions Barrington employment attorney Employment Discrimination Law Schaumburg traffic violations BAIID workplace sexual harassment tax attorney personal injury law firm social media after death Palatine civil litigation lawyer Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney involuntary manslaughter Inverness probate lawyer IRS Rolling Meadows criminal attorney gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Chicago attorney corporate law Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute consent to a search power of attorney for healthcare Crystal Lake traffic attorney bicycle dooring accidents whistleblower protections business litigation Arlington Heights car crash attorneys life insurance Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Schaumburg estate planning lawyer premises liability product liability personal injury claim Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Crystal Lake pet attorney Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer Illinois personal injury attorney real estate leasing Whistleblower Claims traffic accidents Mt Prospect Attorney living trust drug crimes Illinois traffic laws trusts workers compensation benefits Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Barrington workers compensation attorney nursing home negligence Affordable Care Act car crash Illinois attorney speeding Long Grove real estate attorney slip and fall accidents Illinois medical malpractice attorney Illinois insurance attorney texting while driving sole proprietorship Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Chicago estate planning Rolling Meadows accident lawyer Illinois wills and trusts attorneys breathalyzer test Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Illinois lawyer new real estate form Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers insurance claims Crystal Lake traffic lawyer in terrorem provision pet bites underinsured motorist employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys commercial leasing employment law Schaumburg probate attorney Palatine drug lawyer IRELA Buffalo Grove corporate attorney medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Des Plaines personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers DUI penalities Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Palatine corporate attorney Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney boating under the influence golf accidents traffic offenses Inverness traffic law firm Palatine criminal defense lawyer slip and fall personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Chicago will attorney Palatine elder law attorney Policy Cancellation Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers healthcare claims Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Illinois workplace lawyer Barrington real estate lawyer caregiver insurance denial appeals Illinois construction accident attorney Illinois workers compensation attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney trucking accident lawyers child safety Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act traffic deaths Self-Directed IRA Accounts manufacturing Illinois corporate lawyer Illinois DUI attorney uninsured motorist Barrington injury attorney medical research institutional trustee Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer Do Not Resuscitate Illinois employment law attorneys civil litigation attorney overtime violations Crystal Lake employment lawyer murder defense Barrington estate planning attorney car accident Illinois insurance dispute lawyers surgical mistakes Barrington employment law attorney Fourth of July pedestrian accidents expungement Chicago insurance law firm insurance claim Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm distracted driving accidents rest breaks Des Plaines injury law firm traumatic brain injuries llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association accidental death benefits Crystal Lake accident attorney Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents anesthesia errors Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Long Grove real estate lawyer license reinstatement Rolling Meadows employment attorney crossover accidents Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Schaumburg estate planning attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer elder law estate planning for college students digital evidence rent to own real estate contracts Mount Prospect elder law attorney Chicago employment lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers Barrington estate planning lawyer first degree murder Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Illinois job attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney living wills special needs trust Illinois medical malpractice claim CAM digital assets truck collisions insurance attorney operating agreements life insurance claims Super Mario criminal defense bad faith insurance claims Palatine Attorney FSLA Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer life insurance lawyer small business Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers employment lawyer Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys POA pregnant women home inspection lawyer job lawyers Palatine insurance lawyer minimum wage Des Plaines criminal attorney appealing an insurance claim Illinois employee rights attorney. Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Barrington criminal lawyer murder charges attorney fees modern family estate planning food poisoning Schaumburg wrongful death attorney icy parking lots traffic tickets income distribution deducation boating accidents wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Legal Info Thanksgiving dog bites Schaumburg criminal attorney boating DUI Detainer Actions Illinois workplace discrimination attorney automated cars Retaliatory Discharge employees bike accident Des Plaines DUI attorney Illinois law brain injury installment contracts Palatine employment attorney swimming pools employment law, Illinois employment laws Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Illinois bicycle safety Illinois insurance claim attorney Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers forming a corporation in Illinois wrongful termination Crystal Lake personal injury attorney personal injury claims Crystal Lake employment attorney rollover car crashes unfunded trust pizza emoji Transfer on Death Instrument Inverness DUI lawyer employee discrimination independent contractor Illinois car accident attorney wills and trusts Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer estate planning Buffalo Grove injury lawyer pedestrian-automobile accident Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney comp time Inverness personal injury attorney DUI defense Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney marijuana crimes attorney Crystal Lake injury attorney Chicago biking tips compensatory time Inverness civil lawyer hands free device Rolling Meadows probate lawyer insurance claim delay Illinois insurance disputes trench injuries DUI Illinois workers compensation lawyer insurance claim denials Riverwoods estate planning lawyer construction accidents ACA Illinois personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Des Plaines tax law firm Exclusions Chicago employment attorney car collision personal injury attorney civil rights violation Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney owner responsibility Palatine employment lawyer Illinois Sales Representative Act Colin Gilbert Crystal Lake will lawyer jet ski accidents TBI Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Kenilworth estate planning attorney elder abuse ken apicella motorcycle accident traumatic brain injury Arlington Heights real estate lawyer IRA trust transfer real estate attorney pet law federal regulations for LLCs investment property Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer drunk driving statistics Barrington business law firm Illinois estate planning attorney Inverness elder law lawyer Illinois injury lawyer Palatine injury attorney traffic violations defense Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Long Grove estate planning attorneys insurance claim dispute attorney Illinois mortgages liability back injuries Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer reckless homicide Schaumburg insurance lawyers startup company eluding a police officer Palatine punch death LLCs Illinois estate planning Deer Park accident attorney Illinois small business Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer insurance adjusters severance agreements Illinois tax attorney drug crime FMLA clemency Barrington personal injury attorney life insurance policy spinal cord injury real estate attorneys spinal cord injuries federal crimes Long Grove estate planning Liquor Control Act Deer Park employment law attorney Illinois home inspection Barrington Traffic Lawyer Palatine personal injury lawyer Illinois employment law loss of consortium Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Illinois red light cameras Schaumburg real estate lawyer Chicago corporate attorney estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer insurance agents real estate Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Chicago traffic lawyer medical malpractice claims unpaid assessment Illinois boating accident lawyer fiduciary rule delay vacation home fines Illinois pedestrian accident attorney IRA benefits cell phone tower data guardianship attorney Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm senior citizens Joliet general practice lawyers Arlington Heights traffic attorney controlled substance Landlord Tenant Ordinance Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer living trust vs will natural gas explosion privacy filing a medical malpractice claim dynasty trusts Schaumburg car accident attorney meal breaks Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Barrington criminal defense lawyer medical malpractice preventing accidents car crash injuries Illinois pet lawyer texting and driving denied insurance claims Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer liability claims ObamaCare traffic crimes BAC low-ball insurance settlement financial advisors distracted driving accident victims sexual images Crystal Lake law firm Illinois employment law attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney Illinois medical malpractice case estate planning attorney employment contract vacation home Illinois traffic accident lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer denial of life insurance Illinois LLC creation Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer commercial real estate irrevocable trust caretaker rights motorcycle accident lawyer Illinois elder law attorney Chicago estate planning lawyer Inverness accident lawyer personal injury insurance agent negligence landlord health insurance dispute workers comp deed transfer Inverness injury lawyer revenge porn Long Grove estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer medication errors Arlington Heights injury attorney Forcible Entry Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Palatine workers compensation lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney car crashes Des Plaines real estate lawyer foreclosure no contest clauses rumble strips estate planning lawyer Illinois insurance lawyer Inverness insurance attorney insurance negligence Illinois loopholes Illinois driving without license deadly crashes homestead rights estate plan Barrington civil litigation attorney Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Illinois will lawyer Deer Park personal injury lawyer Barrington attorney Illinois Smoke Detector Act pedestrian accident South Barrington real estate attorney sexual harassment real estate contract Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney preventable medical errors Illinois collections attorney Palatine law firm insurance claim denial Illinois business lawyer Schaumburg employment law attorneys Inverness real estate lawyer insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Illinois estate planning law firm Palatine employment law lawyer Illinois probate lawyer murder dram shop law Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Deer Park traffic accident attorney rollover accidents probate process cell phone criminal record creditors Arlington Heights insurance attorney Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer medical marijuana DUI attorney trustee Illinois Human Rights Act Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Illinois insurance claims lawyers Palatine civil attorney Schaumburg employment attorney wills Palatine traffic accidents Des Plaines Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, license revocation Arlington Heights lawyer Illinois criminal defense attorney Des Plaines drug lawyer defective products lawyer wrongful death Arlington Heights criminal lawyer liens Rolling Meadows Illinois trusts attorney Palatine corporate law attorneys paid sick leave Home Remodeling Repair Act Illinois employment laws bicycle accidents disability benefits Schaumburg Attorney Des Plaines accident attorney drug crimes lawyer Illinois living will privacy laws Illinois registered agent insurance claim dispute Arlington Heights TBI attorney healthcare medical malpractice compensation estate attorney dealing with problem employees probate claims GM ignition switches Des Plaines collections attorney Buffalo Grove real estate attorney personal injury lawyer Illinois personal injury Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney trust payments Illinois civil litigation lawyer college kids estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers hit and run accident wage theft civil litigation DGAA foreclosed rental property personal injury accidents Rolling Meadows Attorney Inverness corporate attorney Home Sale Contingencies auto accidents Buffalo Grove law firm underfunded trust Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows tax attorney Illinois wrongful termination lawyer traffic laws Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Illinois traffic ticket lawyer taxes overtime pay Illinois business law atorneys Palatine estate planning lawyer Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer cell phone accidents digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, real estate zoning fiduciary rule trucking accidents Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights accident attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer mass shooting digital information pain and suffering marijuana Chicago insurance claim attorneys suspended license Barrington litigation attorney denied insurance claim Crystal Lake insurance lawyer condo Crystal Lake car accident attorney Illinois real estate lawyer field sobriety test Barrington personal injury lawyer Illinois traffic attorneys Barrington employment law firm insurance dispute attorney Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission drug possession criminal gift taxes insurance dispute employee rights probate fees Des Plaines claims law firm Deer Park real estate law firm residential real estate employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, changes to mortgage law license Family Medical Leave Act Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer criminal law Crystal Lake business law attorneys estate tax living trust benefits School Visitation Rights Act Illinois defective products attorney right to work Jay Andrew hiring employees employee misclassification blended families Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers blood alcohol content real estate lawyer Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer car accidents Deer Park traffic lawyer Crystal Lake tax lawyer Fair Labor Standards Act South Barrington real estate lawyer jet ski Des Plaines real estate attorney trauma after an accident Illinois employment lawyer insurance denials advance healthcare directive Arlington Heights Attorney mortgage problem employees Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Des Plaines insurance attorney Palatine traffic lawyer Barrington boating accident attorney workers compensation defective products car accident lawyers probate insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Illinois employment law firm Deer Park DUI lawyer holiday statistics Palatine trusts lawyer Des Plaines civil attorney real estate closing Illinois rollover accident lawyers Illinois real estate pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Barrington drug crime attorney breach of contract Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act estate planning trusts Schaumburg estate attorney digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Palatine business attorney Palatine construction attorney Illinois trucking safety Inverness estate planning lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney Illinois traffic attorney

Archive