DGAA bLAWg

Driver’s License Suspension

Web Admin - Thursday, December 03, 2015

driver’s license suspension, Crystal Lake Criminal Defense AttorneyFor many people, the ability to drive is very important. It allows individuals to travel easily to important places, like work or school, as well as to places for recreation or other leisure activities. Unfortunately, the right to drive can be taken away. When an individual has his or her license suspended, he or she may be tempted to continue to drive anyway, which can lead to significant consequences. 

Reasons for Suspension 

The Secretary of State (SOS) can suspend a person’s driver’s license for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following: 

1. Three or more moving violations within a 12-month period;

2. Failure to appear in court for a traffic violation;

3. Ten or more unpaid parking violations;

4. Five or more unpaid automated traffic violations (being photographed for running a red light);

5. Failure to pay child support;

6. Failure to pay fines for five or more toll violations;

7. Causing an accident while driving without car insurance; or

8. Driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, an illegal substance, or prescription medication. 

The SOS notifies an individual of a pending license suspension by mail, sent to the last address on file at the SOS. As a result, it is important to update the SOS when a change of address occurs. 

Penalties for Driving 

An individual that chooses to drive while his or her license is suspended can be subjected to various penalties, including: 

1. The suspension period being extended for the same length as was originally imposed;

2. Possible license revocation;

3. Jail time;

4. Seizure of the car’s license plates; or

5. Immobilization of the person’s vehicle. 

Under Illinois law, driving on a suspended license is a Class A misdemeanor. The length of any jail sentence or amount of community service ordered depends on the reason why the license was suspended. For example, a person who drives after he or she had their license suspended for DUI can be sentenced to imprisonment for up to 10 consecutive days or 30 days of community service. 

Importantly, a second or subsequent violation becomes a Class 4 felony if the person is the proximate cause of an accident that results in personal injury or death to another person. A personal injury includes a Type A injury, which is defined as severe bleeding, distorted extremities, and any injuries that are require the person to be carried from the scene. A Class 4 felony is punishable by imprisonment of up to three years, with a minimum sentence of one year. 

It is important that you do not drive while your license is suspended—doing so can lead to serious penalties. Yet, this may be difficult, as our reliance on being able to drive our own vehicles is so strong. If you are facing charges of driving on a suspended license, please contact an experienced Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm provides help for individuals located in Crystal Lake, Schaumburg, Palatine, Des Plaines, Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, Arlington Heights, Inverness, and Deer Park.  

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Source:  

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K6-303


Fleeing or Eluding a Police Officer

Web Admin - Friday, November 06, 2015

eluding a police officer, Crystal Lake criminal defense attorneyUnder most circumstances, an individual readily complies when he or she sees a police officer signal for him or her to pull over and stop. However, in cases where a driver attempts to flee or elude an officer, there are potentially significant consequences. 

Fleeing or Eluding 

Under Illinois law, a driver of a vehicle commits a Class A misdemeanor if he or she intentionally fails or refuses to obey an officer’s visual or audible signal or direction to bring the vehicle to a stop. This violation includes if the driver increases the speed he or she is traveling, turns off his or her lights, or otherwise flees or attempts to elude the officer. 

A signal given by an officer can occur in a variety of ways. However, an officer must be in uniform and, if the officer is driving, he or she must show illuminated red or blue lights which indicate that the vehicle is a police vehicle when used along with an audible siren. 

A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by a jail sentence of up to one year, with a fine of up to $2,500. The Secretary of State will suspend an individual’s driver’s license upon receipt of the notice of a conviction. A suspension lasts for a period of up to six months for a first conviction and up to 12 months for a second conviction. If an individual has committed three or more violations of fleeing or eluding an officer, the offense is a Class 4 felony, and is punishable by not less than one year in jail, with a maximum sentence of up to three years. 

Aggravated Fleeing or Eluding 

A similar, yet more serious offense is aggravated fleeing or eluding an officer. This offense occurs if all of the requirements of fleeing or eluding are satisfied and, while that offense is committed, the driver: 

1. Commits two or more moving violations (such as failing to stop at a red light);

2. Exceeds the speed limit by 20 miles per hour or more;

3. Causes physical harm another person;

4. Causes property damage greater than $300; or

5. Conceals or alters the vehicle’s registration plate. 

Due to the nature of most fleeing or eluding attempts, one of the above actions can easily occur during the attempt to escape the police. For example, it is likely that a person fleeing will drive at a high rate of speed or ignore traffic signals and signs. If one of the above occurs, the penalties for the attempt at fleeing or eluding increase significantly. 

Aggravated fleeing or eluding is a Class 4 felony, with a second or subsequent offense becoming a Class 3 felony. Further, the Secretary of State will revoke the driver’s license of a convicted individual and the motor vehicle used in the fleeing or eluding is subject to a seizure and forfeiture. 

Help Defending Criminal Charges 

If you have been charged with the offenses of fleeing or eluding, you face potentially serious penalties. For more information about these charges and your defense rights, please contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our firm proudly represents individuals throughout the northwest suburbs, in communities such as Crystal Lake, Deer Park, Schaumburg, Inverness, Palatine, Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Buffalo Grove.


About the Author:
 Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Source:  
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K11-204


The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Underage DUI Penalties in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, September 02, 2014

underage drunk driving DUI, Illinois DUI lawyerThe State of Illinois takes all instances of DUIs seriously, but it punishes people under the legal drinking age even more severely. This is because, according to statistics compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 25 percent of fatal car crashes involving teens include at least one underage drunk driver

In order to deal with this issue, the state imposes the standard DUI penalties on underage drivers, and it also tacks on extra zero tolerance penalties. These zero tolerance penalties involve suspensions of driving privileges in circumstances beyond those that would ordinarily qualify as a DUI, and may even involve penalties accruing to the parents of the driver as well.

Standard DUI Penalties

Underage drivers under the influence of alcohol are still subject to standard DUI penalties, but these penalties differ from the DUI penalties for people over the age of 21 in two important respects. First, these penalties are harsher than ordinary DUI penalties. The penalties include a possible $2,500 fine and a license revocation of at least two years, along with up to a year in prison. A second offense comes with the same penalties except that the minimum license revocation increases to five years. Second, these penalties are easier for underage drinkers to trigger. Ordinarily, a DUI charge requires a person to have a blood alcohol content (BAC) of greater than .08. This is still true for underage drinkers, unless there is other evidence proving they were impaired. If such evidence exists, the required BAC drops to .05.

Zero Tolerance Penalties

In addition to the above penalties for an actual DUI charge, underage drinkers can face a host of driving-related penalties. For instance, even if an underage driver registers below a .05, they may still face penalties under zero tolerance laws. Zero tolerance penalties apply to underage drivers who register more than a .00 BAC without triggering full DUI penalties. These zero tolerance penalties include a three-month suspension of driving privileges for a first offense, and a one year suspension for a second offense. Additionally, the law doubles these penalties if the young driver refuses to consent to the necessary testing.

The law also imposes extra penalties on the parents of underage drunk drivers in certain circumstances. If death or great bodily harm results from the parents knowingly allowing underage drinking in their home, then prosecutors may charge the parents with a class 4 felony, which comes with a prison sentence ranging from one to three years and a fine of up to $25,000. Additionally, the parents may be liable for any damage that occurs because of underage drinkers leaving the premises.

If you or your child has recently been charged with a DUI or similar crime, seek help from an Illinois DUI attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers serves clients across the northwest Chicago suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Deer Park.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Palatine Punching Death Leads to Murder Charge

Web Admin - Wednesday, August 20, 2014

palatine criminal defense lawyerA recent death in Palatine, Illinois highlights the ease with which a person can find themselves charged with first degree murder. The incident in question relates to the punching death of a 26-year-old man on July 18th. According to police, another man confronted the victim out in front of a local bar. The assailant allegedly threw a single punch and knocked the victim to the ground. Upon falling, the victim struck his head on the sidewalk, and he was rushed to Lutheran General Hospital. The state initially charged the assailant with aggravated battery, but when the victim died, the charges were upgraded to first degree murder.

Understanding First Degree Murder

When people hear the charge of first degree murder they often focus on concepts like wantonness or premeditation, but in reality the requirements for first degree murder are much simpler. The Illinois criminal code states that a person commits first degree murder when they perform an act that causes a person’s death and they either intend to cause the person’s death or great bodily harm, or they know that their actions will cause the person’s death or great bodily harm, or they know that there is a high probability that their act will cause death or great bodily harm to another person. In this case, even the single punch thrown by the assailant could rise to the level of intent to cause great bodily harm.

However, simply having the intent to do great bodily harm does not necessarily, on its own, tell the full story. This is because the law also contains mitigating factors, circumstances that make the crime less serious because of their existence.

Possible Defenses

The law in Illinois codifies two specific circumstances that can reduce a first degree murder charge down to second degree murder. First, the charge can be reduced if the assailant, at the time of the killing, is “acting under a sudden and intense provocation” that was caused by the victim. Importantly, the provocation in such instances must be quite serious, and merely being insulted would not rise to the level of a mitigating factor. Instead, things like watching someone attack a loved one or being involved in a barroom brawl are often cited as possible scenarios that may count as provocation.

The other scenario that can result in a reduction to second degree murder is when a person commits first degree murder, but does so believing that they have a legal justification for doing so. For instance, if the person believes that they are acting in self-defense when they kill someone, but that belief is not reasonable, they still may have their first degree murder charge reduced to second degree murder.

If you or someone you love has been charged with a criminal offense, seek the help of an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our firm can analyze your case, and help ensure that you and your interests are fairly represented in court. We represent clients in towns across the northwest suburbs including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Palatine.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

underinsured motorist Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Illinois insurance attorney criminal defense Illinois personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer investment property Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake pet attorney no contest clauses personal injury law firm mass shooting Inverness insurance attorney comparative negligence Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Crystal Lake employment law attorney Mount Prospect elder law attorney Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer foreclosure employment law low-ball insurance settlement federal crimes IRA benefits privacy capital gains tax Illinois employment lawyer drunk driving insurance claims Arlington Heights criminal lawyer tax attorney Illinois pet lawyer Illinois employment laws Schaumburg traffic lawyer real estate attorney Des Plaines real estate attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyers comp time Illinois collections attorney Illinois probate lawyer Chicago will attorney Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer rollover accidents living trust vs will commercial leases llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association murder real estate accidental death benefits Attorney Ken Apicella personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney special needs trust Schaumburg elder law lawyer foreclosed rental property Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer DNR living trust unpaid assessment Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm employees Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers Illinois trusts attorney right to work residential real estate Arlington Heights injury attorney Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Chicago biking tips filing a medical malpractice claim food poisoning Illinois law Schaumburg personal injury lawyer ObamaCare federal regulations for LLCs Crystal Lake business law attorneys Arlington Heights traffic attorney probate claims elder abuse real estate closing Fourth of July Des Plaines DUI attorney Crystal Lake accident attorney Illinois Smoke Detector Act IRA trust transfer Illinois Trust Code involuntary manslaughter construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation products liability rumble strips license suspension wage theft Inverness elder law lawyer boating under the influence Crystal Lake car accident attorney overtime violations employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys blood alcohol content gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Chicago attorney Colin Gilbert Landlord Tenant Ordinance defective products lawyer traffic accidents Inverness estate planning lawyer Barrington employment law attorney Thanksgiving Family Medical Leave Act forming a corporation in Illinois School Visitation Rights Act Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Buffalo Grove real estate attorney Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer liens Illinois LLC creation Forcible Entry Schaumburg personal injury attorney Barrington civil litigation attorney pedestrian-automobile accident murder defense Barrington boating accident attorney meal breaks real estate zoning Palatine drug lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Rolling Meadows accident lawyer cell phone accidents internet natural gas explosion digital assets health insurance dispute workplace sexual harassment Illinois insurance disputes Illinois personal injury lawyer Rolling Meadows employment attorney personal injury attorney Palatine probate lawyer Illinois employment law attorney Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Rolling Meadows tax attorney condo hands free device Barrington litigation attorney workers compensation benefits Self-Directed IRA Accounts dealing with problem employees Illinois personal injury Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Palatine traffic lawyer boating DUI Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Long Grove estate planning attorneys minimum wage estate planning attorney Illinois living will pain and suffering coronavirus bicycle accidents criminal record Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney living trust benefits trucking accidents Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney Illinois Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Legal Info South Barrington real estate lawyer Deer Park accident attorney Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer subcontractor Barrington injury attorney Arlington Heights TBI attorney mortgage construction contracts Schaumburg drug defense lawyer golf accidents pay when paid contract life insurance nursing home negligence Illinois attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Crystal Lake law firm insurance claim dispute attorney fiduciary rule delay life insurance lawyer Illinois defective products attorney Illinois speeding lawyer medical malpractice claims Illinois personal injury lawyers Palatine construction attorney wrongful death preventing accidents Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer sexual harassment workers compensation distracted driving accidents spinal cord injury preventable medical errors contracts small business estate tax Home Sale Contingencies dram shop law speeding Crystal Lake injury attorney Barrington workers compensation attorney attorney fees Barrington employment law firm healthcare claims Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Detainer Actions denied insurance claims digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, personal injury accidents digital evidence guardianship attorney Chicago insurance claim attorneys Illinois mortgages Long Grove estate planning GM ignition switches holiday statistics car collision insurance claim dispute Arlington Heights Attorney Des Plaines drug lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer financial advisors Schaumburg car accident attorney Barrington criminal lawyer Illinois job attorney Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer field sobriety test Transfer on Death Instrument rollover car crashes trauma after an accident Illinois boating accident lawyer DUI defense Illinois medical malpractice case swimming pools consent to a search BAIID car accident denial of life insurance Crystal Lake insurance lawyer rent to own real estate contracts breach of contract Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers Illinois red light cameras trench injuries Illinois traffic laws civil litigation Illinois insurance claims lawyers Class A misdemeanor defective products Kenilworth estate planning attorney probate fees jet ski LLCs liability claims traffic laws Arlington Heights estate planning attorney DMV Illinois insurance lawyer Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Palatine punch death landlord tenant law criminal law bike accident Schaumburg estate planning attorney digital information breathalyzer test rest breaks estate plan premises liability Long Grove real estate lawyer deed transfer Chicago employment attorney Inverness real estate attorney Jay Andrew caregiver changes to mortgage law eluding a police officer Barrington business law firm commercial real estate Illinois employment law controlled substance Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Deer Park criminal attorney anesthesia errors insurance claim denial Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Palatine personal injury lawyer Schaumburg corporate attorney insurance dispute wills Palatine criminal defense lawyer fault based insurance motorcycle accident lawyer deadly crashes Crystal Lake will lawyer Do Not Resuscitate fiduciary rule car crash Illinois medical malpractice attorney Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Rolling Meadows Attorney Barrington Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg criminal law attorney Illinois estate planning law firm motorcycle accident taxes personal injury claim Illinois employment law attorneys irrevocable trust employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, Des Plaines insurance attorney dog bites Rolling Meadows business lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney back injuries Super Mario Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer icy parking lots car accidents college kids Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Palatine workers compensation lawyer Illinois workers compensation attorney blended families auto accidents Chicago trucking accident attorney Illinois tax attorney employment attorney life insurance claims Chicago corporate attorney Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers civil rights violation Illinois driving without license TBI Illinois injury lawyer personal injury insurance attorney ACA estate planning trusts texting and driving drug possession first degree murder insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys paid sick leave traumatic brain injuries Palatine Attorney Schaumburg personal injury lawyers car accident lawyers Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Des Plaines Palatine business attorney civil litigation attorney vacation home fines Buffalo Grove employment lawyer Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Illinois workers compensation lawyer Schaumburg probate attorney modern family estate planning Illinois estate planning Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Rolling Meadows traffic law firm real estate leasing Arlington Heights real estate lawyer problem employees Chicago estate planning Schaumburg employment law attorneys Des Plaines collections attorney compensatory time Crystal Lake employment lawyer Schaumburg insurance lawyers corporate law marijuana distracted driving accident victims clemency drugs Schaumburg Attorney Mt Prospect Attorney Illinois real estate lawyer liability Illinois criminal defense attorney pet bites Illinois DUI attorney pedestrian accident advance healthcare directive trustee car crashes Inverness real estate lawyer Palatine elder law attorney wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Illinois Sales Representative Act traffic offenses power of attorney Palatine corporate law attorneys Long Grove estate planning attorney installment contracts Employment Discrimination Law Barrington estate planning lawyer real estate attorneys Retaliatory Discharge Inverness accident lawyer Des Plaines personal injury attorney insurance disputes life insurance policy landlord creditors jet ski accidents DUI medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Schaumburg estate attorney Chicago lawyer drunk driving statistics reckless homicide employment law, Illinois employment laws DGAA Des Plaines pet law attorney Illinois workplace discrimination attorney suspended license pizza emoji estate planning for college students Chicago estate planning lawyer owner responsibility BAC Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer medication errors ken apicella DUI attorney Illinois Human Rights Act Illinois wills and trusts attorneys Illinois Probate Act of 1975 personal injury claims Deer Park traffic accident attorney Inverness civil lawyer Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission traffic tickets unpaid overtime Arlington Heights tax lawyer insurance denial appeals healthcare Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer medical marijuana insurance negligence surgical mistakes traffic crimes Palatine traffic accidents Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer Des Plaines criminal attorney fatal car accidents estate planning car crash injuries probate lawyer insurance adjusters Illinois workplace lawyer Illinois will lawyer Schaumburg wrongful death attorney product liability insurance agents medical malpractice slip and fall Arlington Heights employment law attorneys IRS homestead rights Illinois insurance dispute lawyers Barrington criminal defense lawyer FSLA Crystal Lake employment attorney home inspection lawyer Illinois lawyer insurance dispute attorney bicycle dooring accidents privacy laws DUI penalities sexual images natural gas insurance claim murder charges Rolling Meadows Illinois bicycle safety Whistleblower Claims drug crimes lawyer Illinois insurance claim attorney driving estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Policy Cancellation Long Grove real estate attorney employee misclassification employment contract Palatine real estate lawyer trusts Inverness traffic law firm income distribution deducation digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers Schaumburg employment attorney Illinois employment law firm sole proprietorship Illinois business law atorneys Illinois wills and trusts Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument car accident lawyer dynasty trusts manufacturing CAM Chicago employment lawyer marijuana crimes attorney Illinois rollover accident lawyers power of attorney for healthcare agent Deer Park personal injury lawyer probate claims process Arlington Heights insurance attorney institutional trustee FMLA Barrington drug crime attorney Illinois corporate lawyer probate Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Palatine law firm Illinois traffic accident lawyer POA Inverness probate lawyer Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, new real estate form condo association Schaumburg real estate lawyer Palatine employment law lawyer brain injury loss of consortium Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Crystal Lake tax lawyer Illinois traffic attorney wills and trusts cell phone senior citizens severance agreements insurance agent negligence Buffalo Grove corporate attorney Rolling Meadows probate lawyer Arlington Heights accident attorney Palatine civil attorney loopholes IRELA truck collisions head on collisions pedestrian accidents Des Plaines tax law firm Affordable Care Act construction accidents Palatine injury attorney social media after death Illinois employment attorneys Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers workers comp Des Plaines real estate lawyer commercial leasing Schaumburg criminal attorney medical research crossover accidents criminal Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney cell phone tower data Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Des Plaines claims law firm Schaumburg Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Exclusions drug crimes Deer Park employment law attorney insurance denials elder law Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer startup company Illinois car accident attorney Chicago insurance law firm PTSD personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys real estate lawyer Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer in terrorem provision Illinois registered agent Kenilworth estate planning attorneys Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys unauthorized overtime slip and fall accidents Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney license reinstatement Chicago traffic lawyer revenge porn Barrington employment attorney denied insurance claim Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents traffic violations defense whistleblower protections South Barrington real estate attorney Illinois real estate disability benefits Des Plaines accident attorney Des Plaines civil attorney Buffalo Grove law firm underage DUI Palatine civil litigation lawyer Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer employment lawyer employee rights living wills Kenilworth estate planning lawyer Colin H. Gilbert Rolling Meadows employment law attorney pregnant women Chicago car accident lawyer Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney work unions Palatine corporate attorney Buffalo Grove probate lawyer texting while driving BUI caretaker rights Des Plaines injury law firm Joliet general practice lawyers Illinois business lawyer Crystal Lake traffic attorney hit and run accident child safety Illinois elder law attorney Home Remodeling Repair Act Barrington personal injury lawyer Inverness injury lawyer trust payments traffic violations business litigation vacation home probate process real estate contract overtime pay estate planning lawyer drug crime employee discrimination Fair Labor Standards Act Illinois medical malpractice claim uninsured motorist Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer independent contractor spinal cord injuries Illinois traffic attorneys license wrongful termination Barrington personal injury attorney Illinois trucking safety Arlington Heights car crash attorneys underfunded trust unfunded trust Palatine employment lawyer Illinois employee rights attorney. Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Deer Park DUI lawyer insurance claim delay hiring employees Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer gift taxes job lawyers Inverness corporate attorney Illinois small business pet law license revocation expungement Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Arlington Heights employment attorney Illinois estate planning attorney Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Palatine estate planning lawyer Palatine insurance lawyer Liquor Control Act Barrington attorney operating agreements appealing an insurance claim estate attorney Illinois civil litigation lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic attorney Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Deer Park traffic lawyer traffic deaths Arlington Heights lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Palatine employment attorney traumatic brain injury Buffalo Grove traffic attorney Barrington real estate lawyer trucking accident lawyers Schaumburg construction accident lawyer automated cars Inverness DUI lawyer Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Barrington estate planning attorney Schaumburg injury lawyer insurance claim denials medical malpractice compensation Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Illinois home inspection Deer Park real estate law firm Palatine trusts lawyer boating accidents bad faith insurance claims

Archive