DGAA bLAWg

Clearing a Criminal Record in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 10, 2015

criminal records in Illinois, Arlington Heights criminal defense attorneyPeople who think about the consequences of being caught committing a crime often focus on the penalties that the government imposes after convicting someone, things like prison sentences or fines. Yet, another major consequence is the criminal record that can follow a person through life. Records of arrests, supervisions, or convictions can make it difficult to get a job, a business license, or even an apartment. Fortunately, Illinois law provides a variety of ways for people to clear their criminal records, including expungement, sealing, and other options. However, each of these methods have different effects and different people qualify for them.

Expungements

The most effective method of clearing a person's criminal record is by expunging it. However, it is also the hardest process for which a person can qualify. A person's criminal record is stored in multiple places, such as in the courthouse and at the arresting authority. An expungement instructs these places to physically destroy the copies of the person's criminal record, and to forward clean records to the FBI. This will prevent any background checks from showing the offenses. There are however some limited exceptions to this destruction. For instance, if a person receives supervision for criminal sexual assault, then law enforcement agencies can still access that record for five years after the expungement.

In order to qualify for an expungement, a person must meet several criteria. First, the person can never have been convicted of a criminal offense, the violation of a municipal ordinance, or a serious traffic offense. This means that expungements can only be used to clear things like arrests and supervisions from a record, not convictions. Additionally, depending on the way the case ends, the petitioner may need to wait before filing an expungement. For example, if a person's case is “stricken off with leave to reinstate,” meaning that the prosecution dropped the case but has the option to bring it again, then they must wait three to four months before filing.

Sealing

Sealing a criminal record is a less drastic option for cleaning someone's history. Sealing is different from expungement in that law enforcement agencies can still see the criminal record. However, sealing still hides the record from most employers. Sealing is also easier to qualify for.

Unlike expungement, people can have their records sealed if they were convicted of a crime. However, not all convictions qualify for sealing. A person may only have their record sealed if they were convicted of a misdemeanor. Additionally, there is a waiting period of four years after the conviction before the record may be sealed.

People who do not qualify for sealing may also have other options, such as executive clemency or Certificates of Good Conduct. If you have questions about any of these options, contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our office serves clients in many different northwest suburbs, such as Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Barrington. Call Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, at 847-934-6000 today.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Illinois' New Revenge Porn Law

Web Admin - Friday, January 30, 2015

Illinois revenge porn law, Crystal Lake criminal defense lawyerOne of Former Governor Quinn's last acts during his time in office was to sign a new bill into law criminalizing the act of disseminating private nude photos of someone, commonly referred to as revenge porn. Until recently, revenge porn has been something of a grey area in the legal world. There were certain laws that might have been violated by the act of posting these sorts of images online, such as stalking or harassment, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even copyright law. Yet, these laws were often not well-suited to the situation. This new law, which goes into effect on June 1st, changes that, providing a clear criminal offense for posting revenge porn.

How the Law Works

Illinois' new revenge porn law makes it a class 4 felony to disseminate private sexual images of a person. In order to violate the law, the person's act must fulfill a variety of criteria.

  • - The person must purposefully disseminate an image of a person;
  • The person in the picture must be nude or engaged in some sort of sex act;
  • The person in the photo must be identifiable either from the photo or from other information accompanying the photo;        
  • - The circumstances surrounding the photo must have been such that a reasonable person would have known it was meant to be private; and
  • - The person in the photo must not have consented to its posting.

If a person posts an image that meets these criteria, then they can be sentenced to up to three years in prison along with a possible $25,000 fine.

Many commentators have remarked that this law is a particularly aggressive revenge porn law, citing two main aspects of the law's definition of revenge porn. First, many revenge porn laws require a person to post the image in an effort to harass or humiliate the person in the picture. Illinois' law does not have that same requirement. Second, many revenge porn laws are limited to the initial poster of the picture. Illinois' law covers anyone who posts the picture knowing it was supposed to be private.

The Law's Controversy

The law has met with some pushback, particularly from groups concerned about the free speech implications of the law. American law values freedom of expression highly, and safeguards it above almost any other right. The U.S. Constitution often protects speech from government intervention, especially in cases like this where the restriction on the speech is based on the speech's content. However, since the law has yet to go into effect, no one has challenged it on these grounds.

Criminal law is constantly changing to keep up with offenses related to new technologies. If you have been charged with a crime like this, contact a Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm assists accused clients in many different northwest suburban towns, such as Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Protecting Your Rights During a DUI Stop

Web Admin - Tuesday, June 24, 2014

palatine illinois dui lawyerThe Fourth of July is fast approaching, and like many major holidays it is one of the busiest days of the year for police conducting DUI traffic stops. This heavy police presence makes sense since the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety analyzed federal crash report data and discovered that the Fourth of July is often the deadliest traffic day of the year. In fact, the report reveals a nearly 40 percent increase in traffic deaths during the Fourth of July over the daily average. Given the seriousness with which police view this holiday, it is important for people to be aware of their rights during a DUI stop. People have two main rights that are pertinent to traffic stops: the right to remain silent and the right not to consent to a search.

The Right to Remain Silent

A person’s right to remain silent allows them to refuse to answer police questions during a traffic stop. This means that when the officer asks if the driver has been drinking or where the driver is coming from, the driver is not under any obligation to answer. However, invoking this right involves practical issues. Refusing to cooperate with the officer is technically allowed, but may make the traffic stop more difficult. Consequently, a driver’s being polite and courteous is key, when exercising these rights.

This right extends to refusing field sobriety tests as well. Police will often request that people perform some sort of physical challenge or coordination test to determine if they are sober. While refusing these tests will likely result in a longer traffic stop, it makes it more difficult for the state to pursue a DUI conviction.

Importantly, the right to remain silent is not the same as the right to lie. While the driver does not need to answer the officer’s questions, the information they do choose to provide must be truthful. Further, the right to remain silent also has an exception. The law requires drivers to produce their driver’s license, a copy of their registration, and proof of insurance upon an officer’s request.

The Right Not to Consent to a Search

In addition to the right to remain silent, drivers also have the right to refuse to give the officer permission to search their vehicle. This is not the same as a right not to have the vehicle searched. The officer may still search the car if they have probable cause to suspect something illegal, but evidence from unconsented searches is harder for the state to use at trial.

This right not to consent to a search also affects whether a person must submit to a Breathalyzer test. People do have the right to refuse such a test, however, Illinois has an “implied consent” law, which means such a refusal could result in a driver’s license suspension. Still, that may be preferable to a DUI conviction.

If you were stopped for a DUI this holiday, seek counsel from an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers defends clients in many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

The Case of Bear v. Goldilocks

Web Admin - Thursday, February 27, 2014

illinois criminal civil lawyerWhile people often see the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears as nothing more than a children’s story, it can also act as a simple overview of the legal system. After all, Goldilocks commits a variety of different offenses, both civil and criminal, throughout the story. 

The difference between a civil case and a criminal case is that a civil case involves a dispute between two private parties, the Bears and Goldilocks, while the criminal case involves the state pursuing Goldilocks for her illegal actions. Of course, many of Goldilocks’ actions can give rise to both civil liability and criminal charges.

The Civil Case: Bear v. Goldilocks

The Bears have three claims for which they may be able to sue Goldilocks: trespassing on their land, conversion of the porridge, and conversion of the chair. The Bears can easily show that Goldilocks trespassed on their land, but they will likely not receive any money for doing so, since her act of trespassing did not appear to cause any actual damage on its own. 

As for the claims of conversion, the Bears must show three things: that they owned the porridge and chair, that Goldilocks took some act inconsistent with that ownership, and that their property was damaged by Goldilocks’ acts. Since Goldilocks ate the porridge, and then sat in and broke the chair, the Bears can show that she converted those items and recover their value from Goldilocks.

The Criminal Case: The People v. Goldilocks

The state could also bring criminal charges against Goldilocks for all three of those same actions. These charges would be criminal trespass to land, petty theft of the porridge, and criminal damage to property for breaking the chair. However, the state would not have as easy a case as the Bears did suing for those same actions.

Trespassing is a crime in Illinois punishable by up to a $500 fine and six months in jail, but in order to be guilty of trespassing, a person must enter the land after being warned not to, or they must stay on the land after being told to leave. Unless the Bears had posted a sign warning trespassers, it would only be a civil offense. On the other hand, if Goldilocks had entered the house with a plan to commit a crime, she would be guilty of burglary, a class 2 felony punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

The petty theft of the porridge is an easier case. She clearly steals the porridge by eating it, and in Illinois the seriousness of the theft is determined by the value of the item. Since the porridge was probably worth less than $500, it would be petty theft, a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2500 fine and one year in prison.

The state could also press charges against her for criminal damage to property for her breaking the chair, but this would likely fail. In Illinois, a person must knowingly damage the property to be guilty of the criminal offense. Because Goldilocks did not know she would break the chair if she sat in it, that charge would probably fail.

If you have recently found yourself involved with criminal charges or civil litigation, contact an attorney today. A Rolling Meadows criminal defense or civil litigation attorney can put their knowledge and legal experience to work for you. Our team serves clients across the northwest suburbs, in areas such as Schaumburg, Palatine, Barrington, and Inverness.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, real estate law, and corporate law. He is involved in his local Illinois community as an active member of the DuPage County Bar Association, Northwest Suburban Bar Association, and the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce. In 2012, Colin was nominated for 2012 Business Leader of the Year by the Chamber.


Recent Posts


Tags

IRELA Des Plaines claims law firm Inverness real estate attorney breach of contract Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney agent rest breaks Rolling Meadows traffic law firm Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer pain and suffering Crystal Lake employment attorney fiduciary rule Crystal Lake employment law attorney Schaumburg employment attorney Barrington estate planning lawyer Arlington Heights real estate lawyer Colin H. Gilbert Des Plaines real estate attorney Schaumburg criminal attorney Des Plaines accident attorney Home Remodeling Repair Act Palatine corporate attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys Liquor Control Act Family Medical Leave Act insurance claim denials products liability Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Home Sale Contingencies Arlington Heights lawyer Illinois jet ski accident lawyer medical malpractice Illinois insurance attorney Crystal Lake injury attorney defective products lawyer Des Plaines drug lawyer Illinois boating accident lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Mt Prospect Attorney Illinois personal injury attorney owner responsibility Illinois small business loss of consortium Des Plaines pet law attorney Palatine employment attorney Do Not Resuscitate spinal cord injuries Palatine insurance lawyer Chicago insurance claim attorneys drug crimes lawyer probate low-ball insurance settlement filing a medical malpractice claim liability claims suspended license Schaumburg criminal law attorney employment attorney car collision Palatine drug lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney subcontractor condo association Schaumburg elder law lawyer Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Schaumburg estate planning attorney murder employee discrimination Illinois insurance claim attorney Inverness estate planning lawyer Illinois corporate lawyer Illinois injury lawyer life insurance policy Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act Illinois insurance lawyer BUI Policy Cancellation Inverness civil lawyer Inverness accident lawyer trauma after an accident Illinois employment law attorneys Illinois personal injury lawyer college kids rollover car crashes civil litigation attorney overtime violations preventing accidents underfunded trust medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Palatine punch death problem employees Illinois attorney Des Plaines personal injury lawyer Palatine Attorney Illinois real estate liability criminal insurance disputes social media after death DNR civil litigation Illinois estate planning marijuana landlord tenant law Palatine business attorney Illinois estate planning law firm vacation home fines life insurance Inverness elder law lawyer insurance agents insurance denials wrongful termination icy parking lots pedestrian accidents healthcare Des Plaines DUI attorney loopholes holiday statistics Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney POA commercial leases Barrington injury attorney Illinois bicycle safety probate fees cause-of-death exclusions drug crimes employment law Mount Prospect elder law attorney insurance claims manufacturing sexual harassment driving construction accidents Illinois LLC creation Rolling Meadows Attorney gift taxes FMLA medical marijuana DGAA Illinois Human Rights Act Inverness corporate attorney car crash injuries Illinois trucking safety Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer Barrington employment law attorney living wills commercial real estate employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, employment law, Illinois employment laws Schaumburg Attorney Illinois Trust Code underinsured motorist Palatine trusts lawyer guardianship attorney Buffalo Grove employment lawyer capital gains tax Chicago estate planning lawyer digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, liens IRA benefits bike accident construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation deadly crashes trench injuries Arlington Heights tax lawyer Illinois pedestrian accident attorney no contest clauses Exclusions Chicago employment lawyer Palatine criminal defense lawyer insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys comp time personal injury law firm Illinois employment lawyer Illinois employment attorneys Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney ken apicella hiring employees dealing with problem employees dram shop law insurance agent negligence School Visitation Rights Act dog bites Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Crystal Lake business law attorneys Inverness real estate lawyer corporate law traffic violations Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Chicago traffic lawyer Des Plaines collections attorney FSLA Arlington Heights employment attorney Illinois probate lawyer paid sick leave Kenilworth estate planning attorneys slip and fall Deer Park accident attorney Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Deer Park traffic lawyer forming a corporation in Illinois Deer Park real estate law firm meal breaks insurance adjusters Illinois business law atorneys Illinois rollover accident lawyers spinal cord injury Palatine workers compensation lawyer drugs Jay Andrew texting and driving Rolling Meadows tax attorney gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys Deer Park traffic accident attorney Deer Park DUI lawyer involuntary manslaughter Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer Arlington Heights insurance attorney speeding personal injury claim Illinois mortgages Schaumburg construction accident lawyer Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Schaumburg traffic lawyer Barrington attorney wrongful death Palatine civil attorney Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Des Plaines criminal attorney Illinois defective products attorney jet ski accidents how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims criminal record federal regulations for LLCs Palatine construction attorney dynasty trusts Palatine employment law lawyer slip and fall accidents Schaumburg car accident attorney employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys Illinois traffic attorney estate planning for college students Illinois employee rights attorney. cell phone accidents clemency cell phone Long Grove real estate attorney fiduciary rule delay Fair Labor Standards Act Schaumburg probate attorney whistleblower protections Illinois DUI attorney Arlington Heights injury attorney Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Landlord Tenant Ordinance Illinois Smoke Detector Act Crystal Lake personal injury attorney Detainer Actions Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents life insurance lawyer jet ski foreclosure mass shooting pedestrian accident Arlington Heights car accident lawyer auto accidents digital evidence Barrington personal injury lawyer swimming pools Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney Illinois medical malpractice attorney insurance dispute PTSD insurance claim denial estate tax unpaid assessment Fourth of July Illinois collections attorney business litigation traumatic brain injuries Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Deer Park criminal attorney Illinois red light cameras license suspension Palatine injury attorney Barrington drug crime attorney Illinois will lawyer deed transfer Inverness traffic law firm criminal law Inverness injury lawyer head on collisions construction contracts Schaumburg wrongful death attorney natural gas explosion child safety Illinois Sales Representative Act insurance negligence Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Illinois personal injury Palatine life insurance lawyer Illinois llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association foreclosed rental property Illinois wrongful termination lawyer Crystal Lake employment lawyer personal injury accidents special needs trust ACA Crystal Lake pet attorney fatal car accidents Barrington employment law firm natural gas Barrington personal injury attorney Illinois law employee rights hands free device internet Illinois insurance claims lawyers IRS anesthesia errors insufficient documentation rumble strips vacation home Illinois workers compensation attorney Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer Crystal Lake tax lawyer startup company distracted driving accident victims investment property TBI Barrington business law firm Palatine employment lawyer LLCs pizza emoji wills Illinois estate planning attorney denied insurance claims license revocation Schaumburg personal injury lawyer traffic deaths coronavirus Des Plaines right to work Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers boating under the influence Rolling Meadows insurance attorney Deer Park workers compensation lawyer operating agreements Palatine probate lawyer Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer Barrington criminal defense lawyer murder charges Inverness insurance attorney employees digital assets Illinois medical malpractice case Kenilworth estate planning lawyer breathalyzer test Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer medical research estate planning appealing an insurance claim estate planning attorney work unions pedestrian-automobile accident Forcible Entry Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer caretaker rights Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers underage DUI privacy Joliet general practice lawyers Long Grove estate planning attorney Illinois employment law traffic laws Illinois personal injury lawyers surgical mistakes Schaumburg life insurance attorney expungement Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers Chicago life insurance attorney Illinois wills and trusts Illinois civil litigation lawyer golf accidents BAC distracted driving accidents digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Illinois real estate lawyer denied insurance claim Illinois workers compensation lawyer income distribution deducation Barrington employment attorney trust payments living trust vs will Rolling Meadows accident lawyer pregnant women Arlington Heights estate planning attorney Barrington medical malpractice lawyers taxes Illinois criminal defense attorney Illinois employment law attorney digital information Barrington workers compensation attorney Buffalo Grove probate lawyer Schaumburg personal injury lawyers Buffalo Grove real estate attorney modern family estate planning denial of insurance claim Illinois workplace lawyer Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Palatine corporate law attorneys Illinois lawyer brain injury car accidents rent to own real estate contracts blended families Chicago employment attorney Illinois employment law firm Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer Illinois insurance disputes civil rights violation DUI penalities elder abuse traffic tickets nursing home negligence new real estate form food poisoning commercial leasing Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm drunk driving statistics Thanksgiving Buffalo Grove injury lawyer Rolling Meadows business lawyer job lawyers trucking accident lawyers Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer Arlington Heights traffic attorney estate plan Barrington real estate lawyer rollover accidents sexual images traffic crimes real estate closing most common reasons for life insurance claim denials real estate leasing institutional trustee Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Illinois medical malpractice claim changes to mortgage law Illinois car accident attorney Palatine estate planning lawyer Crystal Lake insurance lawyer Class A misdemeanor workers compensation insurance claim delay Rolling Meadows traffic attorney texting while driving pay when paid contract sole proprietorship Attorney Ken Apicella revenge porn Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer marijuana crimes attorney irrevocable trust CAM license trusts federal crimes life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim caregiver car accident Des Plaines personal injury attorney Illinois job attorney Whistleblower Claims residential real estate Chicago lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg employment law attorneys homestead rights product liability power of attorney for healthcare Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer Employment Discrimination Law Illinois traffic accident lawyer power of attorney Des Plaines real estate lawyer eluding a police officer Inverness DUI lawyer bicycle accidents Illinois elder law attorney Barrington criminal lawyer criminal defense Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Illinois home inspection South Barrington real estate attorney Des Plaines injury law firm fault based insurance beneficiary complications top life insurance claim denials Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Barrington Traffic Lawyer Buffalo Grove corporate attorney unauthorized overtime Deer Park personal injury lawyer Buffalo Grove traffic attorney preventable medical errors estate planning trusts Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney mortgage Colin Gilbert Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Long Grove estate planning attorneys field sobriety test living trust Barrington estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Illinois insurance dispute lawyers probate claims consent to a search drug possession Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Arlington Heights trucking lawyer Deer Park employment law attorney controlled substance creditors Crystal Lake traffic lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Schaumburg estate planning lawyer installment contracts Self-Directed IRA Accounts workers comp Illinois tax attorney drug crime Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Des Plaines civil attorney Illinois registered agent Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorney Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney South Barrington real estate lawyer medication errors Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney Chicago will attorney Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Arlington Heights car crash attorneys motorcycle accident lawyer Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney car accident lawyer living trust benefits Transfer on Death Instrument Palatine traffic accidents Crystal Lake car accident attorney Chicago biking tips wage theft workers compensation benefits insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys Crystal Lake accident attorney independent contractor probate lawyer personal injury attorney Barrington boating accident attorney real estate zoning Kenilworth estate planning attorney disability benefits Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument employment lawyer accidental death benefits estate attorney Palatine real estate lawyer trucking accidents Illinois employment laws probate process Inverness personal injury attorney premises liability real estate contract medical malpractice claims Illinois workplace discrimination attorney small business Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer blood alcohol content attorney fees bicycle dooring accidents Super Mario trustee Buffalo Grove law firm car crashes real estate attorney Rolling Meadows employment attorney life insurance claims in terrorem provision Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer Des Plaines insurance attorney truck collisions uninsured motorist Arlington Heights Attorney overtime pay DMV bad faith insurance claims employee misclassification BAIID Schaumburg real estate lawyer Des Plaines tax law firm automated cars traffic accidents Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney pet bites advance healthcare directive Illinois trusts attorney Arlington Heights TBI attorney Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys Rolling Meadows real estate attorney Palatine civil litigation lawyer Schaumburg injury lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney landlord Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer elder law condo Palatine personal injury lawyer Crystal Lake car accident lawyer employment contract Illinois living will medical malpractice compensation insurance denial appeals Crystal Lake law firm Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer Illinois traffic attorneys boating accidents first degree murder motorcycle accident Crystal Lake traffic attorney hit and run accident Barrington litigation attorney Illinois traffic laws Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers pet law home inspection lawyer Affordable Care Act Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney real estate attorneys defective products severance agreements murder defense traffic violations defense financial advisors Long Grove real estate lawyer DUI defense DUI attorney denial of life insurance tax attorney Chicago corporate attorney reckless homicide Riverwoods estate planning lawyer minimum wage Illinois business lawyer unpaid overtime Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Legal Info compensatory time senior citizens personal injury claims real estate Palatine traffic lawyer Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Palatine law firm healthcare claims Palatine elder law attorney Schaumburg health insurance dispute Illinois wills and trusts attorneys lapse in policy back injuries insurance claim GM ignition switches car accident lawyers car crash privacy laws Chicago estate planning cell phone tower data Barrington civil litigation attorney Chicago car accident lawyer material misrepresentation personal injury Illinois speeding lawyer ObamaCare probate claims process Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Retaliatory Discharge traumatic brain injury Schaumburg personal injury attorney license reinstatement Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act Illinois driving without license Illinois pet lawyer estate planning lawyer boating DUI crossover accidents unfunded trust Crystal Lake will lawyer Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney workplace sexual harassment drunk driving Chicago insurance law firm DUI Inverness probate lawyer Schaumburg estate attorney Schaumburg drug defense lawyer personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Long Grove estate planning IRA trust transfer Arlington Heights accident attorney Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace Schaumburg insurance lawyers insurance claim dispute contracts Rolling Meadows probate lawyer traffic offenses Barrington life insurance lawyer insurance claim dispute attorney Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer comparative negligence Illinois Probate Act of 1975 Chicago attorney Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer wills and trusts real estate lawyer insurance attorney

Archive