DGAA bLAWg

Driver’s License Suspension

Web Admin - Thursday, December 03, 2015

driver’s license suspension, Crystal Lake Criminal Defense AttorneyFor many people, the ability to drive is very important. It allows individuals to travel easily to important places, like work or school, as well as to places for recreation or other leisure activities. Unfortunately, the right to drive can be taken away. When an individual has his or her license suspended, he or she may be tempted to continue to drive anyway, which can lead to significant consequences. 

Reasons for Suspension 

The Secretary of State (SOS) can suspend a person’s driver’s license for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following: 

1. Three or more moving violations within a 12-month period;

2. Failure to appear in court for a traffic violation;

3. Ten or more unpaid parking violations;

4. Five or more unpaid automated traffic violations (being photographed for running a red light);

5. Failure to pay child support;

6. Failure to pay fines for five or more toll violations;

7. Causing an accident while driving without car insurance; or

8. Driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, an illegal substance, or prescription medication. 

The SOS notifies an individual of a pending license suspension by mail, sent to the last address on file at the SOS. As a result, it is important to update the SOS when a change of address occurs. 

Penalties for Driving 

An individual that chooses to drive while his or her license is suspended can be subjected to various penalties, including: 

1. The suspension period being extended for the same length as was originally imposed;

2. Possible license revocation;

3. Jail time;

4. Seizure of the car’s license plates; or

5. Immobilization of the person’s vehicle. 

Under Illinois law, driving on a suspended license is a Class A misdemeanor. The length of any jail sentence or amount of community service ordered depends on the reason why the license was suspended. For example, a person who drives after he or she had their license suspended for DUI can be sentenced to imprisonment for up to 10 consecutive days or 30 days of community service. 

Importantly, a second or subsequent violation becomes a Class 4 felony if the person is the proximate cause of an accident that results in personal injury or death to another person. A personal injury includes a Type A injury, which is defined as severe bleeding, distorted extremities, and any injuries that are require the person to be carried from the scene. A Class 4 felony is punishable by imprisonment of up to three years, with a minimum sentence of one year. 

It is important that you do not drive while your license is suspended—doing so can lead to serious penalties. Yet, this may be difficult, as our reliance on being able to drive our own vehicles is so strong. If you are facing charges of driving on a suspended license, please contact an experienced Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney today. Our firm provides help for individuals located in Crystal Lake, Schaumburg, Palatine, Des Plaines, Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, Arlington Heights, Inverness, and Deer Park.  

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Source:  

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K6-303


Fleeing or Eluding a Police Officer

Web Admin - Friday, November 06, 2015

eluding a police officer, Crystal Lake criminal defense attorneyUnder most circumstances, an individual readily complies when he or she sees a police officer signal for him or her to pull over and stop. However, in cases where a driver attempts to flee or elude an officer, there are potentially significant consequences. 

Fleeing or Eluding 

Under Illinois law, a driver of a vehicle commits a Class A misdemeanor if he or she intentionally fails or refuses to obey an officer’s visual or audible signal or direction to bring the vehicle to a stop. This violation includes if the driver increases the speed he or she is traveling, turns off his or her lights, or otherwise flees or attempts to elude the officer. 

A signal given by an officer can occur in a variety of ways. However, an officer must be in uniform and, if the officer is driving, he or she must show illuminated red or blue lights which indicate that the vehicle is a police vehicle when used along with an audible siren. 

A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by a jail sentence of up to one year, with a fine of up to $2,500. The Secretary of State will suspend an individual’s driver’s license upon receipt of the notice of a conviction. A suspension lasts for a period of up to six months for a first conviction and up to 12 months for a second conviction. If an individual has committed three or more violations of fleeing or eluding an officer, the offense is a Class 4 felony, and is punishable by not less than one year in jail, with a maximum sentence of up to three years. 

Aggravated Fleeing or Eluding 

A similar, yet more serious offense is aggravated fleeing or eluding an officer. This offense occurs if all of the requirements of fleeing or eluding are satisfied and, while that offense is committed, the driver: 

1. Commits two or more moving violations (such as failing to stop at a red light);

2. Exceeds the speed limit by 20 miles per hour or more;

3. Causes physical harm another person;

4. Causes property damage greater than $300; or

5. Conceals or alters the vehicle’s registration plate. 

Due to the nature of most fleeing or eluding attempts, one of the above actions can easily occur during the attempt to escape the police. For example, it is likely that a person fleeing will drive at a high rate of speed or ignore traffic signals and signs. If one of the above occurs, the penalties for the attempt at fleeing or eluding increase significantly. 

Aggravated fleeing or eluding is a Class 4 felony, with a second or subsequent offense becoming a Class 3 felony. Further, the Secretary of State will revoke the driver’s license of a convicted individual and the motor vehicle used in the fleeing or eluding is subject to a seizure and forfeiture. 

Help Defending Criminal Charges 

If you have been charged with the offenses of fleeing or eluding, you face potentially serious penalties. For more information about these charges and your defense rights, please contact an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our firm proudly represents individuals throughout the northwest suburbs, in communities such as Crystal Lake, Deer Park, Schaumburg, Inverness, Palatine, Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, Barrington, Rolling Meadows, and Buffalo Grove.


About the Author:
 Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Source:  
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K11-204


The Status of Medical Marijuana in Illinois

Web Admin - Thursday, January 15, 2015

medical marijuana in Illinois, Arlington Heights drug defense lawyerOne of the most controversial issues currently facing politics is the legalization of marijuana. Some states have gone so far as to completely legalize it, allowing recreational use of the drug. Other states, along with the federal government, have left it totally illegal. Illinois has chosen the middle ground of allowing the use of marijuana to treat certain medical conditions. Illinois' medical marijuana law was signed in 2013, and it creates a framework for how to regulate the use of marijuana. However, there have recently been delays in the implementation of that framework, meaning that even though medical marijuana is technically legal, it is still inaccessible to Illinois residents.

General Rules

The Illinois medical marijuana law sets up both a legal framework for patients who possess marijuana, as well as for growers and distributors. Patients may apply for a medical marijuana card if they have one of almost 40 qualifying illnesses, including Parkinson's, cancer, and glaucoma. In order to get a medical marijuana card, people must also be residents of Illinois who are over the age of 18 and who do not have a criminal record.

As far as a growth and distribution framework, the law allows for 22 businesses to receive licenses to actually grow marijuana. One of these businesses will be located in each state police district. The law also authorizes a set of 60 licenses for distributors who will purchase the marijuana from the growers and sell it throughout the state. Additionally, the law creates a new 16 member board for the addition of new qualifying illnesses to the list of diseases that would allow someone to receive medical marijuana.

Recent Delays

Despite the fact that the law went into effect at the beginning of 2014, it has been plagued with implementation delays. According to a report by the Chicago Tribune, state agencies spent almost a full year just developing the regulations to manage this program. So far, only 650 patients have been given their medical marijuana cards, and the numbers on the business side are even less encouraging.

Many people were hoping that Governor Quinn would award the licenses for the growers and distributors before he left office. However, that did not happen. That means that it will be up to Governor Rauner to make the decision about future licensing. Governor Quinn did make some appointments to the board that will decide about adding new illnesses before he left office, but he also left some spaces open for Governor Rauner to make more appointments.

Illinois's medical marijuana law creates a complex legal framework, and running afoul if it can result in criminal drug charges. If you have recently been charged with a drug crime, contact an Illinois criminal defense attorney. Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC represents the accused in towns across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Arlington Heights.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Thanksgiving Day Massacre: If Turkeys Had Legal Rights

Web Admin - Friday, November 21, 2014
turkey Thanksgiving criminal charges, Schaumburg personal injury lawyer

Thanksgiving is just around the corner now, so it seems like a good time to engage in an educational hypothetical: “what if turkeys had legal rights?” Suppose Chris Carver is just about to start preparing Tom Turkey for Thanksgiving dinner, when Governor Rauner, taking his cue from the annual presidential turkey pardon, decrees that all turkeys are protected and have the same rights as people. The police break down Chris's door, taking him away in handcuffs and saving Tom. This leads to two questions: “what, undoubtedly delicious, crimes could Chris be charged with?” and “what civil claims could Tom bring against him?"

Criminal Charges

There are a variety of crimes that Chris may be guilty of. The two major ones are kidnapping and attempted murder. Kidnapping is defined under Illinois law as “secretly confining someone against their will.” Chris was clearly confining Tom. Assuming it was done secretly, Chris may actually be guilty of aggravated kidnapping, a more serious version of the crime, because he had a carving knife, which would be a deadly weapon for purposes of the law. Aggravated kidnapping is a Class X felony in Illinois, which carries a sentence of between six and 30 years in prison.

However, Chris was doing more than just confining the turkey; he was preparing to cook him, which would be first-degree murder in Illinois. The different degrees of murder in Illinois are based on what the offender was attempting to do. Chris's qualifies for first-degree, the most serious, because he was intentionally trying to kill Tom. The fact that Chris did not succeed in killing Tom Turkey does not matter because he took a “substantial step” towards the murder when he kidnapped Tom. This means that the state could still charge him with attempted first-degree murder, also a Class X felony.

Civil Claims

While the criminal charges would take care of punishing Chris for his crimes, they do not provide Tom with any restitution for his ordeal. Fortunately, Tom can also sue Chris in civil court for several different claims. For instance, Tom can sue Chris for false imprisonment, the civil version of kidnapping, because he held Tom against his will. Tom could also sue Chris for assaulting him, since Chris intentionally acted in a way that put Tom in fear of an immediate harmful contact. Assuming Tom succeeds on these claims he can recover a variety of damages including payment of any medical bills, any wages he lost from his job during his confinement and recover, and compensation for the emotional pain and suffering of almost becoming Thanksgiving dinner.

If you believe you have been a victim of harms like Tom's, or you want to learn more about your criminal rights if you have been charged, contact the Schaumburg personal injury and criminal attorneys at Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC today. We assist clients in Rolling Meadows, Buffalo Grove, Barrington, and throughout the Chicago suburbs. Call 847-934-6000 for a free consultation.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Underage DUI Penalties in Illinois

Web Admin - Tuesday, September 02, 2014

underage drunk driving DUI, Illinois DUI lawyerThe State of Illinois takes all instances of DUIs seriously, but it punishes people under the legal drinking age even more severely. This is because, according to statistics compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 25 percent of fatal car crashes involving teens include at least one underage drunk driver

In order to deal with this issue, the state imposes the standard DUI penalties on underage drivers, and it also tacks on extra zero tolerance penalties. These zero tolerance penalties involve suspensions of driving privileges in circumstances beyond those that would ordinarily qualify as a DUI, and may even involve penalties accruing to the parents of the driver as well.

Standard DUI Penalties

Underage drivers under the influence of alcohol are still subject to standard DUI penalties, but these penalties differ from the DUI penalties for people over the age of 21 in two important respects. First, these penalties are harsher than ordinary DUI penalties. The penalties include a possible $2,500 fine and a license revocation of at least two years, along with up to a year in prison. A second offense comes with the same penalties except that the minimum license revocation increases to five years. Second, these penalties are easier for underage drinkers to trigger. Ordinarily, a DUI charge requires a person to have a blood alcohol content (BAC) of greater than .08. This is still true for underage drinkers, unless there is other evidence proving they were impaired. If such evidence exists, the required BAC drops to .05.

Zero Tolerance Penalties

In addition to the above penalties for an actual DUI charge, underage drinkers can face a host of driving-related penalties. For instance, even if an underage driver registers below a .05, they may still face penalties under zero tolerance laws. Zero tolerance penalties apply to underage drivers who register more than a .00 BAC without triggering full DUI penalties. These zero tolerance penalties include a three-month suspension of driving privileges for a first offense, and a one year suspension for a second offense. Additionally, the law doubles these penalties if the young driver refuses to consent to the necessary testing.

The law also imposes extra penalties on the parents of underage drunk drivers in certain circumstances. If death or great bodily harm results from the parents knowingly allowing underage drinking in their home, then prosecutors may charge the parents with a class 4 felony, which comes with a prison sentence ranging from one to three years and a fine of up to $25,000. Additionally, the parents may be liable for any damage that occurs because of underage drinkers leaving the premises.

If you or your child has recently been charged with a DUI or similar crime, seek help from an Illinois DUI attorney. Our skilled team of lawyers serves clients across the northwest Chicago suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Deer Park.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Palatine Punching Death Leads to Murder Charge

Web Admin - Wednesday, August 20, 2014

palatine criminal defense lawyerA recent death in Palatine, Illinois highlights the ease with which a person can find themselves charged with first degree murder. The incident in question relates to the punching death of a 26-year-old man on July 18th. According to police, another man confronted the victim out in front of a local bar. The assailant allegedly threw a single punch and knocked the victim to the ground. Upon falling, the victim struck his head on the sidewalk, and he was rushed to Lutheran General Hospital. The state initially charged the assailant with aggravated battery, but when the victim died, the charges were upgraded to first degree murder.

Understanding First Degree Murder

When people hear the charge of first degree murder they often focus on concepts like wantonness or premeditation, but in reality the requirements for first degree murder are much simpler. The Illinois criminal code states that a person commits first degree murder when they perform an act that causes a person’s death and they either intend to cause the person’s death or great bodily harm, or they know that their actions will cause the person’s death or great bodily harm, or they know that there is a high probability that their act will cause death or great bodily harm to another person. In this case, even the single punch thrown by the assailant could rise to the level of intent to cause great bodily harm.

However, simply having the intent to do great bodily harm does not necessarily, on its own, tell the full story. This is because the law also contains mitigating factors, circumstances that make the crime less serious because of their existence.

Possible Defenses

The law in Illinois codifies two specific circumstances that can reduce a first degree murder charge down to second degree murder. First, the charge can be reduced if the assailant, at the time of the killing, is “acting under a sudden and intense provocation” that was caused by the victim. Importantly, the provocation in such instances must be quite serious, and merely being insulted would not rise to the level of a mitigating factor. Instead, things like watching someone attack a loved one or being involved in a barroom brawl are often cited as possible scenarios that may count as provocation.

The other scenario that can result in a reduction to second degree murder is when a person commits first degree murder, but does so believing that they have a legal justification for doing so. For instance, if the person believes that they are acting in self-defense when they kill someone, but that belief is not reasonable, they still may have their first degree murder charge reduced to second degree murder.

If you or someone you love has been charged with a criminal offense, seek the help of an experienced Illinois criminal defense attorney today. Our firm can analyze your case, and help ensure that you and your interests are fairly represented in court. We represent clients in towns across the northwest suburbs including in Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, and Palatine.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

How Lawyers Use Digital Evidence in Court

Web Admin - Tuesday, July 15, 2014

criminal defense digital evidenceThe advent of computer technology has reshaped the way that people communicate with each other, as well as how they treat information. This has created an interesting ripple effect in courts, which now have to deal with lawyers seeking to use digital evidence in court, which includes things like incriminating emails, computer files, and Facebook posts. 

The use of this sort of evidence comes with a variety of hurdles that an attorney must clear. The attorney must prove that the evidence is authentic and untampered with, as well as show that the records are acceptable as testimony. Prosecutors in a criminal case have a higher standard to meet, needing to show that their obtaining the evidence did not violate the defendant's privacy rights.

Hurdles to Using Digital Evidence

Lawyers face three hurdles in using digital evidence: authentication, hearsay, and privacy. Authentication refers to the need to demonstrate that the digital evidence is genuine and that no one fabricated or tampered with it. This is more difficult to show with things like emails than with physical letters because people can easily edit or alter the email's text to change the substance of the message. However, many courts still set a fairly low standard of authenticity for allowing the lawyers to present evidence to the jury; they leave the final determination of genuineness to the jury itself.

The next exception to the use of digital evidence is the rule forbidding “hearsay” testimony, which digital evidence often qualifies as. Hearsay is a statement made outside of a courtroom that the lawyer is attempting to use to prove the truth of whatever the statement is about. For instance, if a defendant is on trial for murder and one witness testifies that another witness told them they had seen the defendant commit the murder, that testimony would be hearsay since the testifying witness is just reciting an out-of-court statement.

Finally, in criminal cases, the prosecution must also show that the police obtained the evidence without violating a person's 4th Amendment rights. In many cases this means that the police must have received a warrant to perform the search, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, in the civil case of Largent v. Reed, the court determined that people do not have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in regards to the things they post to Facebook, which would mean that a warrant would not be required to look through a person's Facebook profile.

How People Can Protect Themselves

Protecting online and digital information is a difficult prospect. Often, awareness of the public nature of things like Facebook posts, internet searches, and emails can help people stay alert to the fact that such things may be available as evidence in court. This can help modify people's behavior, and make them more careful about the sort of information that they make digitally available. Beyond that, there are some programs that can encrypt private data, but these can often be decrypted throughout the discovery process.

If you are concerned about the use of digital evidence against you in a trial, contact a Barrington criminal defense attorney today. Our firm represents clients across many northwest suburban towns like Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Department of Justice Expands Clemency Opportunities

Web Admin - Thursday, May 01, 2014

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released changes to the rules that govern which offenders are eligible for clemency. The changes are targeted at federal drug offenders who may have received particularly harsh sentences based on mandatory minimum sentences or other sentencing procedures that are now deemed unfair. The changes affect the 216,000 inmates currently in federal prisons, though preliminary estimates suggest that only approximately 2,000 inmates would be eligible for clemency under the new rules.

What Is Clemency?

Clemency is a power granted to the President under the Constitution that allows him to affect the sentences of federal inmates. Ordinarily, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a branch of the DOJ, examines the applications initially, and makes a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General then passes their own recommendation on to the President who makes the final decision.

Clemency comes in two forms, a pardon or a commutation of a sentence. A pardon represents the President’s forgiveness of the offender for the crime, and often signifies reform or good behavior. This type of clemency will also remove many civil disabilities that come along with a conviction, such as loss of the right to vote or hold state office. Conversely, a commutation is a lesser type of clemency, which can reduce or eliminate a person’s sentence, but will not remove civil disabilities. Importantly, neither type of clemency reverses a conviction or in any way implies that the pardoned offender is innocent.

The New Rules

The new rules released by the DOJ do not replace the old clemency standards, but instead expand on them. They are mainly targeted at drug offenders, but could apply to any inmate with a conviction for any low-level nonviolent offense. The six criteria that the DOJ will examine are:

  • - The inmate must be serving a federal sentence that would be substantially lower if the inmate were convicted of that same offense today;
  • - The inmate must be a “non-violent, low-level” offender with no strong connections to serious criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels;
  • - The individual must have served at least 10 years of their term in prison;
  • - The inmate must not have a large history of criminal activity;
  • - The inmate must have had good behavior while incarcerated; and
  • - The inmate must not have a history of violence either prior to their incarceration or during it.

While meeting these criteria does not necessarily qualify an inmate for clemency, the DOJ has stated that they would “prioritize” clemency applications from people in these categories since they believe that they may be “especially meritorious.”

If you believe that you or a loved one could qualify under these new, expanded clemency standards, seek advice from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney. Our team has experience handling cases from across the northwest suburbs, including in Rolling Meadows, Palatine, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.

Murder in the Mushroom Kingdom: Is Mario a Knight in Shining Armor or a Dangerous Fugitive?

Web Admin - Tuesday, March 25, 2014

illinois criminal defense lawyer mario murderSuper Mario Bros. is one of the best-selling video games of all time, and its story presents an interesting issue of criminal law. In the game, Bowser invades the Mushroom Kingdom, turns all of its inhabitants into inanimate objects, and kidnaps the princess in order to prevent her from undoing the spell. Then, Mario sets off on his quest to free the princess and the kingdom. At the end of the game Mario confronts Bowser, pushing him into a pit of lava to free the princess. This raises the question of whether Mario’s killing of Bowser was a crime or whether it was done out of necessity or self-defense.

The Crimes

After killing Bowser, Mario would likely be charged with some form of homicide. Illinois law breaks homicide down into four categories: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, reckless homicide, and involuntary manslaughter. Of these types of killing, Bowser’s would probably fall into either first or second-degree murder. First-degree murder occurs when a person kills someone either with the intent to kill them or do them serious bodily harm, or when a person kills someone by taking some action that they know will kill or seriously injure the person. Second-degree murder is the same, except that the killing is mitigated by the fact that the killer is either acting under extreme emotional provocation or that the killer has an unreasonable but sincere belief that they have a legal justification for the killing, such as self-defense.

In Mario’s case, it seems most likely that he would be charged with second-degree murder since Bowser had just turned everyone he knew into inanimate objects, which would definitely fall into the serious provocation version of second-degree murder. Furthermore, Mario probably has a strong legal defense to the killing, which he no doubt sincerely believed.

The Defenses

Mario could raise two defenses in his case that would probably allow him to escape with a not guilty verdict: self-defense and necessity. Both of these are covered by the justifiable use of force section of the Illinois Criminal Code. For the purposes of self-defense, a person is allowed to use deadly force only if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent “imminent death or great bodily harm” to themselves or another person. Since Bowser had kidnapped the princess and stolen her kingdom that would probably be grounds for reasonable belief that he was going to kill or seriously harm her.

Mario could also use a defense of necessity for the murder, and it would probably succeed. The concept of necessity allows a person to do something that would be criminal if the harm that arises from it is less that the harm that they prevent with the act. Since Mario’s killing Bowser freed the kingdom, and there were no members of law enforcement left, a court would likely find what he did to be necessary.

If, like Mario, you have recently been the subject of criminal charges, seek help from a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois today. We represent accused citizens in the northwest suburban area, including in Rolling Meadows, Arlington Heights, and Schaumburg.

About the Author: Founding partner of Drost, Gilbert, Andrew & Apicella, LLC, Colin Gilbert, received his J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of law in 2005. Colin argues cases across many practice areas including criminal defense, collections, civil litigation, real estate law, and corporate law. Colin is an active member of the Board of Governors of the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the Illinois Creditors Bar Association. He is currently Vice President of the Arlington Heights Chamber of Commerce, and is a Commissioner for the Village of Arlington Heights. Colin has a 10.0 Attorney rating on Avvo, and was named one of the 2014 “Top 40 Under 40” Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the National Trial Lawyers Association.


Recent Posts


Tags

Illinois personal injury personal injury claims personal injury lawyer insurance dispute boating DUI deed transfer Rolling Meadows criminal lawyer Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyers Kenilworth estate planning attorneys estate attorney gift taxes Illinois law School Visitation Rights Act severance agreements employee rights Schaumburg wrongful death attorney spinal cord injuries Illinois bicycle safety Arlington Heights real estate lawyer wage theft Des Plaines personal injury lawyer digital assets, digital fiduciary, estate planning, digital content, Long Grove estate planning lawyers institutional trustee commercial real estate home inspection lawyer capital gains tax traffic tickets traffic offenses Illinois pet lawyer medical malpractice claims Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers, insurance dispute Barrington attorney Rolling Meadows corporate lawyer Deer Park workers compensation lawyer Crystal Lake tax lawyer Schaumburg personal injury attorney brain injury hands free device drugs Crystal Lake employment attorney fiduciary rule cell phone accidents living wills Illinois insurance claims lawyers Chicago biking tips Deer Park personal injury lawyer civil rights violation Schaumburg employment attorney Des Plaines DUI attorney privacy civil litigation Palatine trusts lawyer Rolling Meadows employment law attorneys insufficient documentation Crystal Lake traffic lawyer senior citizens employment contract, employment law, employment at-will, Deer Park employment law attorneys, contract, wrongful termination distracted driving accident victims unfunded trust boating under the influence South Barrington real estate attorney Illinois employment law attorneys Palatine corporate attorney Des Plaines personal injury attorney premises liability Crystal Lake medical malpractice attorneys owner responsibility workplace sexual harassment digital information Illinois workplace lawyer wrongful death clemency Rolling Meadows probate lawyer car accident financial advisors Policy Cancellation Illinois employee rights attorney. no contest clauses Whistleblower Claims homestead rights Buffalo Grove injury lawyer vacation home operating agreements Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorneys drug possession Schaumburg drug defense lawyer dram shop law Crystal Lake pet attorney Illinois defective products attorney Chicago life insurance attorney Inverness injury lawyer Illinois lawyer Illinois workers compensation lawyer Rolling Meadows life insurance claim denial attorney privacy laws Rolling Meadows business lawyer insurance claim dispute Schaumburg personal injury lawyers liability claims real estate attorney insurance adjusters Rolling Meadows traffic attorney compensatory time trench injuries Kenilworth estate planning attorney Schaumburg construction accident lawyer wills Chicago estate planning condo Barrington estate planning attorney Barrington workers compensation attorney Des Plaines pet law attorney cause-of-death exclusions real estate lawyer Illinois Transfer on Death Instrument Crystal lake insurance dispute attorney Buffalo Grove life insurance attorney BAIID head on collisions Thanksgiving digital evidence loopholes Schaumburg elder law lawyer Palatine drug lawyer Palatine employment law lawyer small business liens Kenilworth estate planning lawyer revenge porn Illinois business lawyer probate fees underfunded trust power of attorney for healthcare problem employees probate drunk driving statistics life insurance claim denial, denial of life insurance claim Illinois employment attorneys Illinois Illinois Probate Act of 1975 unpaid overtime top life insurance claim denials Illinois personal injury lawyer digital assets Des Plaines personal injury lawyers Illinois civil litigation lawyer Illinois medical malpractice attorney workers comp medical research modern family estate planning liability distracted driving accidents real estate leasing Illinois medical malpractice case Illinois estate planning law firm Illinois traffic accident lawyer Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyer Des Plaines real estate attorney Illinois real estate dealing with problem employees DUI defense Illinois employment laws comp time bicycle accidents Schaumburg medication errors Des Plaines real estate lawyer Rolling Meadows medical malpractice lawyers Des Plaines drug lawyer right to work Fourth of July insurance claim denial pedestrian injuries, pedestrian fatality Palatine civil litigation lawyer Des Plaines Traffic Lawyer Schaumburg probate attorney Palatine workers compensation lawyer denial of insurance claim trust payments commercial leasing insurance agents Illinois elder law attorney insurance claim dispute attorney Arlington Heights employment attorney IRELA Palatine life insurance lawyer Illinois DUI attorney life insurance lawyer overtime pay estate planning Chicago will attorney Home Remodeling Repair Act Chicago corporate attorney Schaumburg corporate attorney Schaumburg traffic lawyer Crystal Lake injury attorney Do Not Resuscitate Inverness accident lawyer Family Medical Leave Act coronavirus insurance attorney Illinois living will agent Des Plaines collections attorney uninsured motorist Palatine employment attorney real estate closing Palatine injury attorney Barrington personal injury lawyer life insurance claims Illinois speeding lawyer Illinois Human Rights Act Illinois insurance attorney residential real estate life insurance Arlington Heights TBI attorney Arlington Heights wills and trusts attorney Illinois insurance lawyer Inverness real estate attorney employment law, meal breaks, rest breaks, hotel employees, Des Plaines employment law attorneys condo association Palatine business attorney car crashes business litigation trusts pedestrian accident Barrington litigation attorney Rolling Meadows tax attorney power of attorney Palatine traffic accidents Rolling Meadows Attorney Rolling Meadows accident lawyer college kids Deer Park motorcycle accident lawyer insurance dispute attorney Rolling Meadows Traffic Lawyer caretaker rights Chicago lawyer insurance disputes, Illinois insurance disputes, Illinois insurance dispute attorneys, denied insurance claims, Arlington Heights insurance dispute attorneys cell phone DMV wrongful termination, employment law, whistleblower protections, Illinois employment laws, discrimination in the workplace expungement social media after death employees manufacturing elder law Des Plaines criminal attorney Rolling Meadows Illinois red light cameras surgical mistakes traffic violations motorcycle accident Rolling Meadows employment law attorney Crystal Lake bike accident lawyer products liability Chicago car accident lawyer Buffalo Grove personal injury lawyer gift tax exemption, estate planning, estate planning strategies, Illinois estate planning, South Barrington estate planning attorneys murder charges Colin H. Gilbert rest breaks Illinois criminal defense attorney Illinois Sales Representative Act POA independent contractor IRA trust transfer rollover car crashes ken apicella defective products lawyer eluding a police officer probate lawyer landlord Colin Gilbert Des Plaines motorcycle accident attorney new real estate form traumatic brain injuries Palatine civil attorney Chicago attorney Crystal Lake business law attorneys taxes living trust estate tax Jay Andrew Illinois probate lawyer unpaid assessment drug crimes lawyer Palatine traffic lawyer ObamaCare Arlington Heights car crash attorneys Rolling Meadows estate planning attorney rent to own real estate contracts Palatine law firm Class A misdemeanor Arlington Heights Attorney criminal defense Arlington Heights injury attorney Illinois business law atorneys Crystal Lake traffic attorney tax attorney swimming pools IRS Palatine criminal defense lawyer Arlington Heights tax lawyer estate planning attorney Rolling Meadows real estate attorney personal injury Schaumburg estate planning lawyer Long Grove estate planning employment contract murder defense BUI Barrington injury attorney Schaumburg life insurance attorney medical malpractice compensation insurance dispute, insurance dispute lawyers, insurance claim denial, insurance claim delays, Rolling Meadows insurance dispute attorneys Buffalo Grove insurance claim dispute lawyers traffic crimes blended families underage DUI bike accident Illinois car accident attorney ACA involuntary manslaughter boating accidents Illinois Smoke Detector Act Buffalo Grove car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows drug defense attorney guardianship attorney investment property real estate zoning Buffalo Grove employment lawyer mass shooting Buffalo Grove medical malpractice lawyers personal injury, auto accident injuries, delayed injuries, serious injuries, Des Plaines personal injury attorneys Rolling Meadows employment attorney Illinois corporate lawyer blood alcohol content Illinois trucking safety fiduciary rule delay Illinois medical malpractice claim Barrington estate planning lawyer employee misclassification digital media accounts, estate planning, Arlington Heights estate planning attorney, Illinois Trust Code preventing accidents estate planning, digital assets, Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, Illinois digital assets, Illinois estate planning, Palatine elder law attorney hiring employees marijuana crimes attorney Mount Prospect real estate lawyer Crystal Lake personal injury lawyer bicycle dooring accidents advance healthcare directive llinois Real Estate Lawyers Association spinal cord injury DUI Retaliatory Discharge commercial leases Crystal Lake estate planning lawyer DGAA trauma after an accident Rolling Meadows insurance attorney sole proprietorship employee discrimination slip and fall Illinois employment law firm Illinois workers compensation attorney car accidents Illinois injury lawyer Barrington personal injury attorney Illinois motorcycle accident lawyer Illinois traffic attorney TBI license revocation rollover accidents Barrington business law firm Landlord Tenant Ordinance work unions living trust vs will Illinois pedestrian accident attorney Self-Directed IRA Accounts Illinois personal injury attorney license suspension Crystal Lake employment lawyer nursing home negligence creditors unauthorized overtime car crash Palatine probate lawyer pregnant women GM ignition switches holiday statistics workers compensation Barrington Illinois estate planning lawyer food poisoning Deer Park traffic accident attorney sexual harassment Des Plaines tax law firm FSLA Illinois jet ski accident lawyer Illinois construction accident attorney Schaumburg criminal law attorney Illinois insurance claim dispute lawyer personal injury law firm DUI penalities estate plan Des Plaines Illinois registered agent Deer Park medical malpractice attorney Chicago traffic lawyer car crash injuries Buffalo Grove personal injury attorney Joliet general practice lawyers criminal law Illinois estate planning attorney drunk driving Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission federal regulations for LLCs Crystal Lake civil litigation lawyer license probate claims workers compensation benefits breach of contract Palatine punch death criminal subcontractor Illinois wills and trusts Attorney Ken Apicella Rolling Meadows boating crash lawyer health insurance dispute Arlington Heights personal injury attorney Rolling Meadows litigation lawyer Affordable Care Act wills and trusts Rolling Meadows personal injury lawyers Long Grove real estate attorney Schaumburg Attorney real estate attorneys medical malpractice, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, medical mistake, Deer Creek medical malpractice lawyers Crystal Lake will lawyer preventable medical errors vacation home fines Fair Labor Standards Act traumatic brain injury traffic laws Buffalo Grove traffic attorney back injuries insurance claim jet ski accidents corporate law Deer Park real estate law firm Barrington criminal defense lawyer Illinois personal injury lawyers Illinois traffic ticket lawyer Schaumburg estate attorney pedestrian-automobile accident Chicago estate planning lawyer employment law fault based insurance insurance claims drug crimes Des Plaines drug crimes lawyer license reinstatement Illinois collections attorney Arlington Heights trucking lawyer suspended license Inverness elder law lawyer Inverness real estate lawyer pet bites motorcycle accident lawyer employment lawyer Palatine Attorney federal crimes Crystal Lake car accident lawyer Rolling Meadows car accident lawyers Schaumburg medical malpractice lawyer Long Grove wills and trusts attorneys Schaumburg personal injury lawyer Arlington Heights estate planning attorney disability benefits Buffalo Grove traffic lawyers Illinois real estate lawyer texting while driving anesthesia errors insurance claim denials job lawyers Illinois wrongful termination lawyer loss of consortium traffic accidents startup company defective products Illinois employment law car collision Crystal Lake criminal defense attorney Illinois workplace discrimination attorney lapse in policy Illinois tax attorney Arlington Heights employment law attorneys Arlington Heights personal injury lawyer crossover accidents jet ski Des Plaines insurance attorney Barrington employment law attorney landlord tenant law contracts Illinois driving without license medical marijuana Palatine employment lawyer accidental death benefits Inverness civil lawyer construction accidents, personal injury, wrongful death, Arlington Heights personal injury attorneys, workers' compensation speeding Riverwoods estate planning lawyer Inverness personal injury attorney Illinois attorney Deer Park employment law attorney Exclusions texting and driving insurance denials irrevocable trust DNR pizza emoji Rolling Meadows insurance dispute lawyers Chicago employment attorney hit and run accident Palatine real estate lawyer changes to mortgage law product liability Barrington medical malpractice lawyers Barrington civil litigation attorney Crystal Lake law firm Chicago employment lawyer Long Grove real estate lawyer Chicago trucking accident attorney car accident lawyers appealing an insurance claim medical malpractice Crystal Lake insurance lawyer rumble strips Buffalo Grove real estate attorney CAM PTSD foreclosure healthcare claims filing a medical malpractice claim Inverness corporate attorney Illinois employment lawyer Inverness estate planning lawyer Barrington drug crime attorney Illinois traffic laws Long Grove estate planning attorneys Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act breathalyzer test Illinois insurance claim attorney Employment Discrimination Law Rolling Meadows DUI lawyer auto accidents cell phone tower data icy parking lots employment attorney Inverness insurance attorney Buffalo Grove criminal defense lawyer Palatine personal injury lawyer Illinois small business Illinois traffic attorneys material misrepresentation Buffalo Grove corporate attorney reckless homicide personal injury accidents dog bites field sobriety test Crystal Lake medical malpractice lawyer minimum wage dynasty trusts Rolling Meadows criminal attorney Arlington Heights criminal lawyer Illinois mortgages Mt Prospect Attorney Arlington Heights traffic attorney pay when paid contract Illinois insurance dispute lawyers pedestrian accidents probate claims process Illinois insurance disputes life insurance policy Deer Park criminal attorney Schaumburg employment law attorneys marijuana probate process Illinois boating accident lawyer personal injury claim estate planning, death tax, succession plans, business estate plans, Barrington estate planning lawyers Barrington real estate lawyer foreclosed rental property golf accidents Illinois medical malpractice lawyers Detainer Actions Illinois estate planning forming a corporation in Illinois estate planning trusts FMLA traffic violations defense insurance negligence Schaumburg civil litigation attorney Arlington Heights insurance attorney Illinois trusts attorney Arlington Heights car accident lawyer Palatine estate planning lawyer denied insurance claims Illinois rollover accident lawyers Schaumburg injury lawyer income distribution deducation LLCs slip and fall accidents Illinois LLC creation beneficiary complications Chicago insurance claim attorneys insurance disputes Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act criminal record Forcible Entry drug crime driving insurance denial appeals first degree murder Transfer on Death Instrument Super Mario Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyers Barrington life insurance lawyer Arlington Heights medical malpractice lawyer internet construction contracts Crystal Lake medical malpractice law firm special needs trust how to avoid common denials of life insurance claims Chicago will attorney, social media platforms, Illinois estate planning lawyer, Schaumburg estate planning attorney natural gas sexual images Palatine corporate law attorneys in terrorem provision South Barrington real estate lawyer Mount Prospect wills and trusts lawyers paid sick leave insurance agent negligence Illinois job attorney attorney fees Arlington Heights wills and trusts lawyer estate planning lawyer Des Plaines medical malpractice attorney Des Plaines claims law firm most common reasons for life insurance claim denials Home Sale Contingencies Barrington boating accident attorney Arlington Heights accident attorney meal breaks Des Plaines accident attorney truck collisions Arlington Heights lawyer trucking accidents mortgage Crystal Lake personal injury attorney overtime violations whistleblower protections Chicago insurance law firm bad faith insurance claims Crystal Lake employment law attorney Inverness DUI lawyer deadly crashes murder pet law Rolling Meadows insurance lawyer elder abuse Mount Prospect elder law attorney Barrington Traffic Lawyer Palatine construction attorney denial of life insurance denied insurance claim healthcare Palatine insurance lawyer Schaumburg car accident attorney Crystal Lake car accident attorney Rolling Meadows marijuana attorney traffic deaths real estate Inverness traffic law firm consent to a search Deer Park traffic lawyer Deer Park DUI lawyer Barrington employment law firm employment law, Illinois employment laws Arlington Heights pedestrian accidents pain and suffering living trust benefits Arlington Heights Traffic Lawyer Long Grove estate planning attorney caregiver Crystal Lake accident attorney Legal Info Liquor Control Act BAC trustee Des Plaines injury law firm low-ball insurance settlement Schaumburg insurance lawyers Crystal Lake pedestrian accident lawyer child safety Des Plaines civil attorney Illinois home inspection personal injury attorney Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Deer Park accident attorney DUI attorney automated cars Inverness probate lawyer comparative negligence civil litigation attorney Illinois employment law attorney Buffalo Grove probate lawyer car accident lawyer natural gas explosion Barrington criminal lawyer Rolling Meadows traffic law firm controlled substance IRA benefits Buffalo Grove law firm Schaumburg real estate lawyer installment contracts construction accidents fatal car accidents Illinois will lawyer underinsured motorist trucking accident lawyers estate planning for college students Illinois wills and trusts attorneys insurance claim delay Barrington employment attorney real estate contract Schaumburg criminal attorney Rolling Meadows personal injury attorney

Archive